Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erik Eckstein
86fb74a34e DI: support assign_by_delegate instruction 2019-04-23 11:32:28 -07:00
Jordan Rose
425c190086 Restore initializing entry points for @objc convenience initializers (#21815)
This undoes some of Joe's work in 8665342 to add a guarantee: if an
@objc convenience initializer only calls other @objc initializers that
eventually call a designated initializer, it won't result in an extra
allocation. While Objective-C /allows/ returning a different object
from an initializer than the allocation you were given, doing so
doesn't play well with some very hairy implementation details of
compiled nib files (or NSCoding archives with cyclic references in
general).

This guarantee only applies to
(1) calling `self.init`
(2) where the delegated-to initializer is @objc
because convenience initializers must do dynamic dispatch when they
delegate, and Swift only stores allocating entry points for
initializers in a class's vtable. To dynamically find an initializing
entry point, ObjC dispatch must be used instead.

(It's worth noting that this patch does NOT check that the calling
initializer is a convenience initializer when deciding whether to use
ObjC dispatch for `self.init`. If we ever add peer delegation to
designated initializers, which is totally a valid feature, that should
use static dispatch and therefore should not go through objc_msgSend.)

This change doesn't /always/ result in fewer allocations; if the
delegated-to initializer ends up returning a different object after
all, the original allocation was wasted. Objective-C has the same
problem (one of the reasons why factory methods exist for things like
NSNumber and NSArray).

We do still get most of the benefits of Joe's original change. In
particular, vtables only ever contain allocating initializer entry
points, never the initializing ones, and never /both/ (which was a
thing that could happen with 'required' before).

rdar://problem/46823518
2019-01-14 13:06:50 -08:00
Michael Gottesman
9620bedf7a [di] Rename: DIMemoryUseCollector{Ownership,}.{cpp,h}
This was done early on during the split of predictable mem opts from DI. This
has been done for a long time, so eliminate the "Ownership" basename suffix.
2018-12-30 16:11:56 -08:00
Michael Gottesman
db30959a9d [pred-memopt] Replace remaining occurances of prefix DI with PMO prefix.
I am going to DI and predictable mem opts have been split for a long time and
their subroutines aren't going to be joined in the future... so replace the DI
prefixes in pred-mem-opts impl with PMO and rename DIMemoryUseCollector =>
PMOUseCollector.

Been sitting on this for a long time... just happy to get it in.
2018-05-22 12:52:43 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
269f8e8d56 [pred-memopts] Rather than asserting on recursive initialization, just return false and bail.
Until the beginning of the ownership transition, DI and predictable mem opts
used the same memory use collector. I split them partially since I need to turn
on ownership for predictable mem opts at one time, but also b/c there was a huge
amount of special code that would only trigger if it was used by DI or used by
predictable mem opts. After I did the copy some of the asserts that were needed
for DI remained in the predictable mem opts code. When pred-memopts was only run
in the mandatory pipeline keeping these assertions were ok, but pred-memopts was
recently added to the perf pipeline meaning that it may see code that breaks
these DI invariants (and thus hit this assertion).

We should remove this limitation on predictable-memopts but that would require
some scheduled time to read the code (more than I have to fix this bug = p). So
instead I changed the code to just bail in these cases.

rdar://40032102
2018-05-11 09:50:32 -07:00
David Zarzycki
8c0c55539f [SIL] NFC: Rename misleading getSwiftRValueType() to getASTType()
Reference storage types are not RValues. Also, use more SILType helper
methods to avoid line wrap.
2018-05-04 08:14:38 -04:00
John McCall
ab3f77baf2 Make SILInstruction no longer a subclass of ValueBase and
introduce a common superclass, SILNode.

This is in preparation for allowing instructions to have multiple
results.  It is also a somewhat more elegant representation for
instructions that have zero results.  Instructions that are known
to have exactly one result inherit from a class, SingleValueInstruction,
that subclasses both ValueBase and SILInstruction.  Some care must be
taken when working with SILNode pointers and testing for equality;
please see the comment on SILNode for more information.

A number of SIL passes needed to be updated in order to handle this
new distinction between SIL values and SIL instructions.

Note that the SIL parser is now stricter about not trying to assign
a result value from an instruction (like 'return' or 'strong_retain')
that does not produce any.
2017-09-25 02:06:26 -04:00
Michael Gottesman
676d13846a [pred-memopt] More debriding of DI only stuff from DIMemoryUseCollector.
rdar://31521023
2017-09-13 21:07:19 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
dd17536922 [pred-memopts] Debride all dead MarkUninitialized related code from DIMemoryUseCollector.
rdar://31521023
2017-09-13 17:29:37 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
6adcc2969e [semantic-sil] Change DefiniteInitialization to use the DIMemoryUseCollectorOwnership header instead of the normal DIMemoryUseCollector.
This is necessary since other passes rely on DIMemoryUseCollector.h and I want
to update each one of them individually to minimize disruption.

rdar://31521023
2017-04-13 16:41:53 -07:00
Erik Eckstein
f8034ac7bf PredictableMemOpt: be more conservative about address_to_pointer
Handling address_to_pointer as a plain inout missed some mutations and lead to miscompiles.
We now treat address_to_pointer as escaping address.

Fixes SR-3554
2017-01-10 09:25:51 -08:00
practicalswift
6d1ae2a39c [gardening] 2016 → 2017 2017-01-06 16:41:22 +01:00
Slava Pestov
786d87b9bb DI: Operate on substituted field types
When adding a designated initializer to a nominal type in another
module, we would call getType() on deserialized VarDecls, which
is not allowed.

Instead, it is more correct to use SILTypes throughout and call
SILType::getFieldType() to get a substituted field type.

Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3545>.
2017-01-04 21:30:21 -08:00
Hugh Bellamy
63db0041d4 Fix warnings and error building swift/SILOptimizer on Windows with MSVC (#5956) 2016-12-02 13:06:08 -08:00
practicalswift
797b80765f [gardening] Use the correct base URL (https://swift.org) in references to the Swift website
Remove all references to the old non-TLS enabled base URL (http://swift.org)
2016-11-20 17:36:03 +01:00
Erik Eckstein
8110b1ebc8 [SIL] Let alloc_box return a single value.
And use project_box to get to the address value.
SILGen now generates a project_box for each alloc_box.
And IRGen re-uses the address value from the alloc_box if the operand of project_box is an alloc_box.
This lets the generated code be the same as before.

Other than that most changes of this (quite large) commit are straightforward.
2016-01-19 08:59:24 -08:00
Erik Eckstein
6ff2f09796 [SIL] Let alloc_stack return a single value.
Having a separate address and container value returned from alloc_stack is not really needed in SIL.
Even if they differ we have both addresses available during IRGen, because a dealloc_stack is always dominated by the corresponding alloc_stack in the same function.

Although this commit quite large, most changes are trivial. The largest non-trivial change is in IRGenSIL.

This commit is a NFC regarding the generated code. Even the generated SIL is the same (except removed #0, #1 and @local_storage).
2016-01-06 17:35:27 -08:00
Zach Panzarino
e3a4147ac9 Update copyright date 2015-12-31 23:28:40 +00:00
practicalswift
85e2e6eb9a Fix a vs. an 2015-12-26 14:40:16 +01:00
Andrew Trick
739b0e9c56 Reorganize SILOptimizer directories for better discoverability.
(libraries now)

It has been generally agreed that we need to do this reorg, and now
seems like the perfect time. Some major pass reorganization is in the
works.

This does not have to be the final word on the matter. The consensus
among those working on the code is that it's much better than what we
had and a better starting point for future bike shedding.

Note that the previous organization was designed to allow separate
analysis and optimization libraries. It turns out this is an
artificial distinction and not an important goal.
2015-12-11 15:14:23 -08:00