AnyFunctionType::Param carries around information about decomposed
parameters now. Information about default arguments must be computed
separately with swift::computeDefaultMap.
Track outcomes of `conformsToProtocol` calls in `simplifyConformanceConstraints`
to be able to validate conformances when solution is formed to avoid returning
solutions with nominal types with invalid conformances to protocols.
Instead of having three different scores for - string, array, inout,
let's unify them under a single value-to-pointer score and use
it in appropriate places when simplifying restricted constraints.
There are possible situations when we find solutions with String
and String -> UnsafePointer conversions at the same time for
expressions with default string literals. In order to disambiguite
such situations let's prefer solutions without String -> UnsafePointer
conversions if possible.
Restrict skipping of the generic overloads only to the situations
when non-generic solution doesn't have any restrictions/fixes, because
there is a possibility that generic overload could produce a better
solution.
Resolves: rdar://problem/32204609.
Add additional checking for complexity of the shrinking candidate
given the number of the expressions solved so far and total number
of disjunctions present. This allows us to bail quicker in complex
expression cases which, at the very least, produces an error instead
of being "stuck" in solver for a long time.
Resolves: rdar://problem/32034560
More updates to read and write types from a side table in the constraint
solver and only write back into expressions when we've finished type
checking an expression.
We still write directly into expressions, and will continue to do so
until all of the code has been updated.
When this score kind was added, the marker for the last score kind was
not updated. As a result, increasing the score for SK_KeyPathSubscript
was not actually having an effect.
Add tests that include a type with subscripts that also take the key
paths as their argument with an identical argument label ("keyPath").
These tests show that we're actually falling back on the keypath
application in many cases despite the score kind specific to keypath
application. I'll open a couple new JIRAs to investigate this
behavior.
The update to SK_LastScoreKind results in fixing a crash in these tests
that happens as a result of an assumption in CSRanking.cpp that if we're
comparing two solutions we end up with decls for overloads to compare,
which isn't the case here due to the keypath application.
Consolidate some of the attributes and operations common to disjunction choice
in new `DisjunctionChoice` class, which simplifies implementation of the
`ConstraintSystem::solveSimplified` method related to overload selection.
The old TVO_MustBeMaterializable is now equivalent to
!TVO_CanBindToLValue && !TVO_CanBindToInOut.
I tried to update all usages of createTypeVariable() to
pass TVO_CanBindToInOut unless they explicitly passed
TVO_MustBeMaterializable before.
However, in reality TVO_CanBindToInOut is the rare case;
we can remove this flag gradually over time to fix
crashes and diagnostics.
If a lazy var has no declared type, we have to type check the
initializer to get a type before we can build the getter.
Then, the initializer is type checked as part of the getter
again.
Use the new SkipApplyingSolution flag when type checking for
the first time. We still end up doing redundant work, but by
not applying the solution we avoid feeding invalid AST nodes
back into the constraint solver.
This fixes some bad diagnostics and crashes.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2616> and
<rdar://problem/28313602>.
The openType() function did two things:
- Replace unbound generic types like 'G' with fresh type variables
applied to bound generic types, like 'G<$T0>'.
- Replace generic parameters with type variables from the replacement
map.
The two behaviors were mutually exclusive and never used from the
same call site, so split them up into two independent functions.
Also, eliminate ConstraintSystem::openBindingType() since it was only
used in one place and could be expressed in terms of existing functions.
If we had an unbound generic type whose parent was a bound
generic type, and the outer type's generic signature
placed generic constraints on outer parameters, we would
create type variables that weren't ever bound to anything.
Previously, this would never come up, but it will once
preCheckExpression() is folding more MemberRefExprs down
to TypeExprs.
We use simplifyConstraint() to activate other constraints, and then
examine those constraints to find related disjunctions. In examining
those active constraints, we were simplifying them in case they
failed (which would allow us to bail out earlier). In doing so, we could
potentially generate new disjunctions when we simplify an unresolved
value member constraint. If we do that, we end up collecting these new
disjunctions as part of the set of related disjunctions, but that's
problematic because as part of exiting the solver scope to roll back
changes we delete these disjunctions from the system.
Instead of actually simplifying the active constraints, just collect the
disjunctions and move the active constraints back to the inactive list.
With this change we can build the stdlib.
This is still disabled by default, and as with the previous
implementation does not pass all tests if enabled.
Rather than looking for applicable function constraints and then looking
at the bind overload disjunctions associated with those, instead
directly collect all bind overload disjunctions and revise the enabled
elements of those disjunctions by attempting to bind them simultaneously
with the elements of other disjunctions that are linked to this one
through applicable function constraints.
Don't pass in the opened type; instead have the caller call
simplifyType() if needed. Also, make computeSubstitutions()
bail out if there's no generic signature, which allowed
unifying several generic vs non-generic code paths.
Hopefully there is enough short circuiting in there now that
we're not doing any extra work in the non-generic case.
There are a handful of things, but the primary ones are that we really
don't want to track depth of recursion so much as whether we are
processing at the "top level" of constraints we're looking at or not so
that we can determine whether we can disable elements from a
disjunction.
Related, there are places where we can bail out earlier if we know
that *any* neighboring constraint passes.
Also updating the way we gather neighboring constraints to be
independent of the function that simplifies them. The original code was
wrong in that in bailed as soon as one of the simplifications
failed (which meant we might not gather all of them).
This is an initial implementation of the constraint propagation pass,
disabled by default at the moment as it does not currently pass all
tests.
I have other changes that I'll hold off on for now because they are
incomplete. Without those changes, this pass doesn't really achieve
much, so this is really just a checkpoint on some progress and not
something really worth trying out at this point.
This is disabled by default but enabled under the frontend option
-propagate-constraints.
The idea here is to have a pass that enforces local consistency in our
constraint system, in order to reduce the domains of constraint
variables, speeding up the solving of the constraint system.
The initial focus will be on reducing the size of the disjunctions for
function overloads with the hope that it substantially improves the
performance of type checking many expressions.
We previously penalized bindings to Any, and that resulted in
inappropriately rejecting solutions where we bind a decl that is
explicitly typed Any. That penalty was removed in
170dc8acd7, but that has led to a variety
of source compatibility issues.
So now, we'll reintroduce a penalty for Any-typed things, but instead of
penalizing bindings (which happen both because of explicitly-typed
values in the source, and implicitly due to attempting various types for
a particular type variable), penalize casts, which are always present in
some form in the source.
Thanks go to John for the suggestion.
Fixes
SR-3817 (aka rdar://problem/30311052)
SR-3786 (aka rdar://problem/30268529)
rdar://problem/29907555
Without this, CSGen/CSSimplify and CSApply may have differing
opinions about whether e.g. a let property is settable, which
can lead to invalid ASTs.
Arguably, a better fix would be to remove the dependency on the
exact nested DC. For example, we could treat lets as settable
in all contexts and then just complain later about invalid
attempts to set them. Or we could change CSApply to directly
use the information it already has about how an l-value is used,
rather than trying to figure out whether it *might* be getting set.
But somehow, tracking a new piece of information through the
entire constraint system seems to be the more minimal change.
Fixes rdar://29810997.
ConstraintSystem::simplifyType() replaced types with their fixed types
from the global map.
Solution::simplifyType() replaced types with their fixed types from the
current bindings.
There were some minor differences between the two, and some dead code.
Rather than waiting until we've used a huge amount of memory, attempt to
make the choice to bail out based on the number of type bindings /
disjunction choices we visit.
I expect this will generally fail faster than the Swift 3 metric, but
will still only fail when we've got clearly exponential type checking
behvior.
Since we have multiple sources of exponential behavior today, I don't
want to make the bounds too tight. Once we fix some/most of that
behavior we can look at further tightening up the metric.
