...well, at least a little more than before. This /still/ isn't as
strong as the switch that used to be here because a subtype of an
existing Decl or Type won't show up, but that's probably still worth
the maintainability (and backtrace) tradeoff.
That is, if a struct's generic requirements can't be deserialized,
drop the struct. This is the same logic that's already in play for
enums and (as of the previous commit) classes, so it should be pretty
well tested by now. (Hence the sole test I'm adding here, snuck into
superclass.swift because it's a superclass /constraint/ being tested.)
I don't know of any outstanding issues caused by this, but it was
weird to have it for enums and classes but not structs, so here we
are.
...instead of crashing. Also drop the class if its generic
requirements depend on a type that can't be loaded (instead of
crashing).
rdar://problem/50125674
These can be recreated if needed in a client library. To do this, I've
added a new ConformanceLookupKind::NonInherited, which can also be
used elsewhere in the project where we're already filtering out
inherited conformances some other way.
Note that this doesn't drop inherited conformances from the entire
serialized interface, just from the list that a class explicitly
declares. They still get referenced sometimes.
rdar://problem/50541451 and possibly others
Similar to 517f5d6b6a, the "shadowed" terminology didn't end up
describing the most common use of the feature; there is pretty much no
intended case where a Swift module shadows a Clang module without also
re-exporting it. Switch to "underlying", which was already in use in a
few places, and which better parallels "overlay".
No intended functionality change.
To distinguish between classes which have the same name (but are in different contexts).
Fixes a miscompile if classes with the same name are used from a different module.
SR-10634
rdar://problem/50538534
Previously 'isSystemModule()' returns true only if the module is:
- Standard library
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
Now:
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`; or
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
- Swift module found in either of these directories:
- Runtime library directoris (including stdlib)
- Frameworks in `-Fsystem` directories
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/System/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
rdar://problem/50516314
Computing the requirement signature created the generic params as
a side effect. Making getRequirementSignature lazy means that users
of the generic params must make sure they are created before use.
This commit adds a new type DynamicLookupInfo that provides information
about how a dynamic member lookup found a particular Decl. This is
needed to correctly handle KeyPath dynamic member lookups, but for now
just plumb it through everywhere.
Serialize the relationship between a property that has an attached delegate
and its backing variable, so deserialization can reestablish that link.
Fixes rdar://problem/50447022.
Dependency tracking for cached compiled modules (compiled from
swiftinterfaces) can lead to a high percentage of the module being
SDK-relative paths when -track-system-dependencies is on. Cut down on
this by storing directory names in a separate record that gets
referenced from each file dependency. (Since a lot of per-file
dependencies are header files in a common directory, this is a win.)
We can do something more clever in the future, but this is a
reasonable start for, say, the overlays.
rdar://problem/50449802
Fix a trio of issues involving mangling for opaque result types:
* Symbolic references to opaque type descriptors are not substitutions
* Mangle protocol extension contexts correctly
* Mangle generic arguments for opaque result types of generic functions
The (de-)serialization of generic parameter lists for opaque type
declarations is important for the last bullet, to ensure that the
mangling of generic arguments of opaque result types works across
module boundaries.
Fixes the rest of rdar://problem/50038754.
form SerializedModuleLoader into its own ModuleLoader class. (NFC-ish)
This gives better control over the order in which the various module
load mechanisms are applied.
When printing a swiftinterface, represent opaque result types using an attribute that refers to
the mangled name of the defining decl for the opaque type. To turn this back into a reference
to the right decl's implicit OpaqueTypeDecl, use type reconstruction. Since type reconstruction
doesn't normally concern itself with non-type decls, set up a lookup table in SourceFiles and
ModuleFiles to let us handle the mapping from mangled name to opaque type decl in type
reconstruction.
(Since we're invoking type reconstruction during type checking, when the module hasn't yet been
fully validated, we need to plumb a LazyResolver into the ASTBuilder in an unsightly way. Maybe
there's a better way to do this... Longer term, at least, this surface design gives space for
doing things more the right way--a more request-ified decl validator ought to be able to naturally
lazily service this request without the LazyResolver reference, and if type reconstruction in
the future learns how to reconstruct non-type decls, then the lookup tables can go away.)
