TupleShuffleExpr could not express the full range of tuple conversions that
were accepted by the constraint solver; in particular, while it could re-order
elements or introduce and eliminate labels, it could not convert the tuple
element types to their supertypes.
This was the source of the annoying "cannot express tuple conversion"
diagnostic.
Replace TupleShuffleExpr with DestructureTupleExpr, which evaluates a
source expression of tuple type and binds its elements to OpaqueValueExprs.
The DestructureTupleExpr's result expression can then produce an arbitrary
value written in terms of these OpaqueValueExprs, as long as each
OpaqueValueExpr is used exactly once.
This is sufficient to express conversions such as (Int, Float) => (Int?, Any),
as well as the various cases that were already supported, such as
(x: Int, y: Float) => (y: Float, x: Int).
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2672, rdar://problem/12340004
Introducing the SIMD operators back into the standard library regresses
one test (SR-139 goes exponential against without the designated types
for operatores feature). Split that part of the test out.
When the compiler fails to find an overload with suitable parameter or return types, it often attaches a note listing the available overloads so that users can find the one they meant to use. The overloads are currently ordered in a way that depends on the order they were declared, so swift-evolve would sometimes cause tests involving these diagnostics to fail.
This change emits the list in a textually-sorted order instead. The names were already being sorted as they were inserted into a std::set, so this shouldn’t significantly slow down the diagnostic.
This makes diagnostics more verbose and accurate, because
it's possible to distinguish how many parameters there are
based on the message itself.
Also there are multiple diagnostic messages in a format of
`<descriptive-kind> <decl-name> ...` that get printed as
e.g. `subscript 'subscript'` if empty labels are omitted.
An earlier patch fixed the case where some tuple elements
were lvalue types. However this only looked into tuples
nested one level deep, when a more correct fix checks the
lvalue recursive property of the type.
Implements part of SE-0110. Single argument in closures will not be accepted if
there exists explicit type with a number of arguments that's not 1.
```swift
let f: (Int, Int) -> Void = { x in } // this is now an error
```
Note there's a second part of SE-0110 which could be considered additive,
which says one must add an extra pair of parens to specify a single arugment
type that is a tuple:
```swift
let g ((Int, Int)) -> Void = { y in } // y should have type (Int, Int)
```
This patch does not implement that part.
We previously produced the error message:
rdar25271859.swift:14:11: error: value of tuple type '(Float, Int)' has no member '0'
a.map { $0.0 }
^~ ~
We now produce:
rdar25271859.swift:15:5: error: generic parameter 'U' could not be inferred
.andThen { dataResult in
^
which is at least is correct, if not yet helpful.
This flips the switch to have @noescape be the default semantics for
function types in argument positions, for everything except property
setters. Property setters are naturally escaping, so they keep their
escaping-by-default behavior.
Adds contentual printing, and updates the test cases.
There is some further (non-source-breaking) work to be done for
SE-0103:
- We need the withoutActuallyEscaping function
- Improve diagnostics and QoI to at least @noescape's standards
- Deprecate / drop @noescape, right now we allow it
- Update internal code completion printing to be contextual
- Add more tests to explore tricky corner cases
- Small regressions in fixits in attr/attr_availability.swift
and provide a fix-it to move it to the new location as referenced
in SE-0081.
Fix up a few stray places in the standard library that is still using
the old syntax.
Update any ./test files that aren't expecting the new warning/fix-it
in -verify mode.
While investigating what I thought was a new crash due to this new
diagnostic, I discovered two sources of quite a few compiler crashers
related to unterminated generic parameter lists, where the right
angle bracket source location was getting unconditionally set to
the current token, even though it wasn't actually a '>'.
- All parts of the compiler now use ‘P1 & P2’ syntax
- The demangler and AST printer wrap the composition in parens if it is
in a metatype lookup
- IRGen mangles compositions differently
- “protocol<>” is now “swift.Any”
- “protocol<_TP1P,_TP1Q>” is now “_TP1P&_TP1Q”
- Tests cases are updated and added to test the new syntax and mangling
This commit defines the ‘Any’ keyword, implements parsing for composing
types with an infix ‘&’, and provides a fixit to convert ‘protocol<>’
- Updated tests & stdlib for new composition syntax
- Provide errors when compositions used in inheritance.
Any is treated as a contextual keyword. The name ‘Any’
is used emit the empty composition type. We have to
stop user declaring top level types spelled ‘Any’ too.
There are a couple of features that are not yet implemented, because they require additions to the Builtin module. Specifically, this implementation does not have:
- formRemainder(dividingBy:)
- formSquareRoot()
- addProduct(_:,_:)
Also missing are the generic initializers and comparisons whose implementation depends on having new Integer protocols.
The last remaining feature of SE-0067 is that while the basic operators +,-,*,/, etc are moved onto the FloatingPoint protocol, they are still required on the concrete types in order to disambiguate overloads. Fixing this seems to require either modifying the overload resolution rules or removing these operators from some other protocols. Or it might just require that someone smarter than me looks at the problem.
Passes all the existing tests (with the included changes). I'm working on additional tests for the new features.
This crash was a bug in computeTupleShuffle handling conversions to
a parameter list with a varargs argument in the middle of the list.
In this case, it is coming from the parameter list for Swift.print.
When inferring a contextual type for the input expression to an assignment,
use getRValueType() to strip lvalues from tuple types in recursive positions,
this allows us to produce a sensible diagnostic of:
error: binary operator '%' cannot be applied to two 'T' operands
instead of:
error: cannot assign value of type 'T' to type '@lvalue _'
because we don't have a weird lvalue type in the way.
argument. For now we start with some of the most simple cases: single argument
calls. This dramatically improves the QoI for error messages in argument lists,
typically turning a error+note combo into a single specific error message.
Some minor improvements coming (and also generalizing this to n-ary calls), but it
is nice that all the infrastructure is starting to come together...
Swift SVN r30905
get the same wording, fixing <rdar://problem/21964599> Different diagnostics for the same issue
While I'm in the area, remove some dead code.
Swift SVN r30713
