We should use parser to figure out the end position of object literal expression instead
of scanning through token stream, which crashes sourcekitd when the syntax is invalid.
Fixing: rdar://48390913
This change permits UnresolvedDotExpr to have both a name and a base that are implicit, but a valid DotLoc, and to treat that DotLoc as the node’s location. It then changes the generation of string interpolation code so that `$stringInterpolation.appendInterpolation` references have a DotLoc corresponding to the backslash in the string literal.
This makes it possible for `ExprContextAnalyzer` in IDE to correctly detect when you are code-completing in a string interpolation and treat it as an `appendInterpolation` call.
Now that we manipulate the argument list to correct strange interpolations in Sema, we can parse interpolations directly as argument lists, simplifying the parser.
By itself, this refactoring causes a code completion regression; a subsequent commit will fix that.
Previously 'isSystemModule()' returns true only if the module is:
- Standard library
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
Now:
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`; or
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
- Swift module found in either of these directories:
- Runtime library directoris (including stdlib)
- Frameworks in `-Fsystem` directories
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/System/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
rdar://problem/50516314
When performing keypath dynamic member lookup, avoid substituting the
base type in override detection and completion, as the base type of the
lookup is not the base type of the member. For now, we just avoid the
substitution entirely to fix potential crashes; in a future commit we
will change to using the subscript return type and substituting with the
base type of the subscript instead of the base type of the lookup.
rdar://50449788
Looks into the root type of the keypath to find additional members. This
does not currently map the type of the completion to the subscript's
return type.
rdar://49029126
Ensure the various entity walkers handle the implicit subscript
reference correctly (usually by ignoring it) and fall through to the
underlying declarations.
rdar://49028895
Escapingness is a property of the type of a value, not a property of a function
parameter. Having it as a separate parameter flag just meant one more piece of
state that could get out of sync and cause weird problems.
Instead, always look at the noescape bit in a function type as the canonical
source of truth.
This does mean that '@escaping' is now printed in a few diagnostics where it was
not printed before; we can investigate these as separate issues, but it is
correct to print it there because the function types in question are, in fact,
escaping.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-10256>, <rdar://problem/49522774>.
