Cleans up AST printing somewhat as well as providing slightly better
type-to-declaration mappings for annotated AST printing and indexing.
Swift SVN r32420
where we type check the destination first, then apply its type to the source.
This allows us to get diagnostics for assignments that are as good as PBD
initializers and other cases.
Swift SVN r31404
and diagnoseGeneralConversionFailure(). The previous approach of trying
to dig into anchors would often lead to complaining about types at
different levels in the same diagnostic, and the complexity of the former
code isn't needed now that other changes have landed.
Swift SVN r31036
"unavoidable failure" path, along with Failure::DoesNotHaveNonMutatingMember and
just doing some basic disambiguation in CSDiags.
This provides some benefits:
- Allows us to plug in much more specific diagnostics for the existing "only has
mutating members" diagnostic, including producing notes for why the base expr
isn't mutable (see e.g. test/Sema/immutability.swift diffs).
- Corrects issues where we'd drop full decl name info for selector references.
- Wordsmiths diagnostics to not complain about "values of type Foo.Type" instead
complaining about "type Foo"
- Where before we would diagnose all failures with "has no member named", we now
distinguish between when there is no member, and when you can't use it. When you
can't use it, you get a vauge "cannot use it" diagnostic, but...
- This provides an infrastructure for diagnosing other kinds of problems (e.g.
trying to use a private member or a static member from an instance).
- Improves a number of cases where failed type member constraints would produce uglier
diagnostics than a different constraint failure would.
- Resolves a number of rdars, e.g. (and probably others):
<rdar://problem/20294245> QoI: Error message mentions value rather than key for subscript
Swift SVN r30715
get the same wording, fixing <rdar://problem/21964599> Different diagnostics for the same issue
While I'm in the area, remove some dead code.
Swift SVN r30713
which we have a contextual type that was the failure reason. These are a bit
longer but also more explicit than the previous diagnostics.
Swift SVN r30669
- Improve handling of if_expr in a couple of ways: teach constraint simplification
about IfThen/IfElse and teach CSDiags about the case when the cond expr doesn't match
BooleanType. This is rarely necessary, but CSDiags is all about cornercases, and this
does fix a problem in a testcase.
- Be a bit more specific about the constraint failure kind (e.g. say subtype) and when
we have a protocol conformance failure, emit a specific diagnostic about it, instead of
just saying that the types aren't convertible.
Swift SVN r30650
- Have DiagnosticEngine produce "aka" annotations for sugared types.
- Fix the "optional type '@lvalue C?' cannot be used as a boolean; test for '!= nil' instead"
diagnostic to stop printing @lvalue noise.
This addresses:
<rdar://problem/19036351> QoI: Print minimally-desugared 'aka' types like Clang does
Swift SVN r30587
we can start taking advantage of ambiguously typed subexpressions in CSDiags. We
start by validating the callee function of ApplyExprs, which substantially improves
our abilities to generate precise diagnostics about malformed calls.
This is the minimal introduction of this concept to CSDiags, a lot of refactoring
is yet to come, however, this is enough to resolve:
<rdar://problem/21080030> Bad diagnostic for invalid method call in boolean expression
<rdar://problem/21784170> Incongruous `unexpected trailing closure` error in `init` function which is cast and called without trailing closure.
one of the testcases from:
<rdar://problem/20789423> Unclear diagnostic for multi-statement closure with no return type
and a bunch of other places where we got weird "unexpected trailing closure"
diagnostics that made no sense. As usual, it is two steps forward and one step back,
as this exposed some other weird latent issues like:
<rdar://problem/21900971> QoI: Bogus conversion error in generics case
Swift SVN r30429
It's safe to do this as long as the protocol has already been fully type-checked,
and we can guarantee that if the protocol lives in another module.
The next commit shows why this is useful: "extension dispatch_queue_t" is much
nicer than "extension OS_dispatch_queue".
Swift SVN r30099
facilities used by operators etc. This required a bunch of changes to make
the diagnostics changes strictly an improvement:
- Teach the new path about calls to TypeExprs.
- Teach evaluateCloseness some simple things about varargs.
- Make the generic diagnosis logic produce a better error when there is
exactly one match.
Overall, the resultant diagnostics are a step forward: we now produce candidate
set notes more uniformly, and the messages about some existing ones are
more specific. This is just another stepping stone towards progress though.
Swift SVN r30057
path associated with them, and to dig the expression the constraint refers to out
of the locator. Also teach simplifyLocator how to simplify closureexpr results out.
This eliminates a class of completely bogus diagnostics where the types reported
don't make any sense, resolving a class of radars like 19821875, where we now
produce excellent diagnostics.
That said, we still pick constraints to report that are unfortunate in some cases,
such as the example in expr/closure/closures.swift.
Swift SVN r29757
We were dropping *all* constraints on the Self type when forming
constraints from a protocol member, which included the extra
constraints provided by constrained extensions. Only drop the actual
protocol in which the member occurs (or the protocol extended by the
containing extension).
Fixes rdar://problem/21401180 and the 8 dupes I've found so far.
Swift SVN r29708
- Diagnose instead of crashing when doing this:
extension Array : MyProto where T : Equatable {}
- Fix crash when Self appeared in where clause
- Finally, improve the diagnostic for this:
extension Array<Foo> {}
Fixes <rdar://problem/21349794>.
Swift SVN r29379
This permits, e.g., extending Array for all Hashable T's. However, it
does not permit extending Array for T == String. Part of
rdar://problem/21142043.
Swift SVN r29107
We're not sure when or if we want 'final' on protocol extension
members, so accept it but don't complain one way or another. We zap
this early on so that we don't end up printing it in generated
interfaces. Fixes rdar://problem/21112901.
Swift SVN r29040
Based on Dave’s hack, this allows one to define a “default implementation” as, e.g.,
protocol P {
func foo()
}
extension P {
final func foo() { … }
}
Swift SVN r28949
This information keeps declarations in differently-constrained
protocol extensions separate. Fixes rdar://problem/21060743 and
enables the (N+1)st iteration of the default implementations hack.
Swift SVN r28887
This allows us to overload properties and subscripts with the same
signature in differently-constrained protocol extensions. Previously,
such overloads would be considered to be erroneous redeclarations.
Swift SVN r28610
Now that we don't have generic parameter lists at arbitrary positions
within the extended type of an extension declaration, simplify the
representation of the extended type down to a TypeLoc along with a
(compiler-synthesized) generic parameter list.
On the parsing side, just parse a type for the extended type, rather
than having a special grammar. We still reject anything that is not a
nominal type (of course), but it's simpler just to call it a type.
As a drive-by, fix the crasher when extending a type with module
qualification, rdar://problem/20900870.
Swift SVN r28469
We no longer allow extensions to provide generic parameters, and the
ability to parse the syntax
extension Array<String> { ... }
is causing confusion. Fixes rdar://problem/20873336.
Swift SVN r28468
var/let bindings to _ when they are never used, and use some values that
are only written. This is a testsuite cleanup, NFC. More to come.
Swift SVN r28406
When performing unqualified lookup within a type context (or method
thereof) that is a protocol or a protocol extension, use the Self
archetype of the protocol or extension so we look in types implied by
the requirements as well. Part of rdar://problem/20509152, fixing the
example provided in rdar://problem/20694545.
Swift SVN r28363
Members of protocols found via unqualified name lookup are mapped to
their corresponding witnesses, as we do for qualified name
lookup. This is the bulk of the compiler changes for
rdar://problem/20509152. Performing this mapping for unqualified name
lookup of types will follow.
Swift SVN r28333
Within the where clause of a constrained (protocol) extension, allow
us to find associated types of that protocol and anything it inherits
via unqualified lookup, e.g.,
extension SequenceType where Generator.Element : Equatable { }
rather than
extension SequenceType where Self.Generator.Element : Equatable { }
Implements rdar://problem/20722467.
Swift SVN r28208
If a generic parameter is not referred to from a function signature, it can never be inferred and thus such a function can never be invoked.
We now produce the following error:
generic parameter 'T' is not used in function signature
func f8<T> (x: Int) {}
This commit takes Jordan't comments on r28181 into account:
- it produces a shorter error message
- it does not change the compiler_crashers_fixed test and add a new expected error instead
Swift SVN r28194
If a generic parameter is not referred to from a function signature, it can never be inferred and thus such a function can never be invoked.
We now produce the following error:
There is no way to infer the generic parameter 'T' if it is not used in function signature
func f8<T> (x: Int) {}
^
Swift SVN r28181
AnyObject won't always be a protocol, and it may be de-protocol'ified
well before we get the ability to extend an arbitrary type (if that
ever happens), so ban this for now.
Swift SVN r28120
The culprit happened to be a type representation cloner for tuple type
representations that didn't actually clone anything. Introduce an
AST-level verifier that makes sure we catch any archetypes that slip
into interface types earlier in the future.
Fixes rdar://problem/18796397 and the three dupes I've found so far.
Swift SVN r28080
We might be looking at a protocol requirement, which conforms to a
protocol but has a null conformance. Also, don't bother looking at
completeness: it doesn't matter. Fixes rdar://problem/20608438.
Swift SVN r27860
in Xcode 6.4 I changed the compiler to start treating properties as rvalues in
initializers when they have an initializer since they cannot be overwritten
in the initializer. This has the unfortunate effect of typing derived member_refs
as rvalues as well, which causes SILGen to load the entire 'self' value instead of
just the member, triggering invalid DI errors in cases like this.
Fix this by always treating properties on self as lvalues in initializers. Invalid
reassignments are already diagnosed by DI anyway, and the QoI of the error is better
from DI than from Sema (as shown by the testsuite change).
Swift SVN r27721
The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
