The old message, "deinitializer does not have a parameter clause," was
confusing because it would be issued for a deinit that clearly *had* a
parameter clause. Also, one out of three messages called deinitializers
"'deinitializer' functions." Since "deinitializer" does not appear in
the program text, it doesn't make sense to quote it, either.
Swift SVN r21468
When a non-final class satisfies a method requirement that returns
Self, it must do so with a method that also returns (dynamic)
Self. This ensures conformance will be inheritable, closing off an
awful type-safety hole <rdar://problem/16880016>. Other
non-contravariant uses of Self in the signatures of requirements cause
the protocol to be unusable by non-final classes.
I had to leave a tiny little gaping hole for the ~> operator, whose
removal is covered by <rdar://problem/17828741>. We can possibly put
this on firm footing with clever handling of generic witnesses, but
it's not important right now.
Swift SVN r20626
modifiers and with the func implementations of the operators. This resolves the rest of:
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
Swift SVN r19931
eliminating the @'s from them when used on func's. This is progress towards
<rdar://problem/17527000> change operator declarations from "operator prefix" to "prefix operator" & make operator a keyword
This also consolidates rejection of custom operator definitions into one
place and makes it consistent, and adds postfix "?" to the list of rejected
operators.
This also changes the demangler to demangle weak/inout/postfix and related things
without the @.
Swift SVN r19929
This only tackles the protocol case (<rdar://problem/17510790>); it
does not yet generalize to an arbitrary "class" requirement on either
existentials or generics.
Swift SVN r19896
Mechanically add "Type" to the end of any protocol names that don't end
in "Type," "ible," or "able." Also, drop "Type" from the end of any
associated type names, except for those of the *LiteralConvertible
protocols.
There are obvious improvements to make in some of these names, which can
be handled with separate commits.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17165920> Protocols `Integer` etc should get
uglier names.
Swift SVN r19883
- Change the parser to accept "objc" without an @ sign as a contextual
keyword, including the dance to handle the general parenthesized case.
- Update all comments to refer to "objc" instead of "@objc".
- Update all diagnostics accordingly.
- Update all tests that fail due to the diagnostics change.
- Switch the stdlib to use the new syntax.
This does not switch all tests to use the new syntax, nor does it warn about
the old syntax yet. That will be forthcoming. Also, this needs a bit of
refactoring, which will be coming up.
Swift SVN r19555
Better to describe how the protocol can be used than how it can't. Also include a mention of Self type requirements as a source of non-existentiability.
Swift SVN r19207
These types are often useless and confusing to users who expect to be able to use Sequence or Generator as types in their own right like in C# or Java. While we're here, relax the rules for self-conformance to admit methods returning 'Self'. Covariant return types should not actually prevent a protocol type from conforming to itself, and the stdlib makes particular use of protocols with 'init' requirements which implicitly return Self.
Swift SVN r18989
There's a lot more work to do here, but start to categorize tests
along the lines of what a specification might look like, with
directories (chapters) for basic concepts, declarations, expressions,
statements, etc.
Swift SVN r9958
