At DaveA's suggestion, I took a mostly mechanical approach to this:
pointers and numeric types start using += 1, and indexes use
i = i.successor(). The index model is likely to be revised in
Swift 3 anyway, so micro-optimizing this code syntactically isn't
super important.
There is some performance concern of this patch, since some
in-place succesor operations are more efficient than
i = i.successor(). The one that seems particularly at issue is the
instance in the implementation of partition(), which I changed to
use i._successorInPlace(). If other instances lead to a perf issue,
they can be changed to use that as well.
Revert "For unsafeReferenceCast rely on static verifier checks."
This reverts commit r32796.
This reverts commit r32795.
They very likely broke a buildbot.
Swift SVN r32813
unsafeBitCast should only be used when we actually need to lie to the type system (as opposed to just having an unchecked downcast).
Theses are the places where unsafeReferenceCast makes sense:
(In general it makes sense whenever the source & dest are class or class existential types)
- ArrayBuffer.getElement.
The deferred downcast case cannot be benchmarked. It is never on the critical path.
The ObjC array case cannot conceivably matter either, however, it is touched by
DollarChain, JSONHelperDeserialize, and StrSplitter.
These benchmarks do not regress at -O.
- arrayForceCast
No regressions at -O based on microbenchmarks.
None of these remaining cases affect PerfTestSuite at -O:
- General ObjC bridging
- Set/Dictionary bridging
- String bridging
- AutoreleasingUnsafeMutablePointer
These are confirmed speedups but I did not investigate the cause:
|.Chars...................|.32.1%.|
|.Sim2DArray..............|.15.4%.|
|.Calculator..............|.13.0%.|
|.RecursiveOwnedParameter.|..7.9%.|
Swift SVN r32796
ArraySlice indices now map directly onto the collection it is slicing
and maintains that mapping even after mutations.
Before:
var a = Array(0..<10)
var s = a[5..<10]
s.indices // 0..<5
s[0] = 111
s // [111, 6, 7, 8, 9]
s.removeFirst()
s.indices // 1..<5
After:
var a = Array(0..<10)
var s = a[5..<10]
s.indices // 5..<10
s[5] = 99
s // [99, 6, 7, 8, 9]
s.removeFirst()
s.indices // 6..<10
- Refactor some of the internals of the buffer types to make it easier
to read and understand.
- Add Array, ArraySlice, and ContiguousArray to the test suite at the
RangeReplaceable test entry points, subjecting them to the same tests
as all of our collections.
- Update existing test expectations for the indexing changes.
rdar://problem/21866825
Swift SVN r30840
Change all uses of "do { ... } while <cond>" to use "repeat" instead.
Rename DoWhileStmt to RepeatWhileStmt. Add diagnostic suggesting change
of 'do' to 'repeat' if a condition is found afterwards.
<rdar://problem/20336424> rename do/while loops to repeat/while & introduce "repeat <count> {}" loops
Swift SVN r27650
The standard library has grown significantly, and we need a new
directory structure that clearly reflects the role of the APIs, and
allows future growth.
See stdlib/{public,internal,private}/README.txt for more information.
Swift SVN r25876
