Two paths missed setting up overlays:
- `CompletionInstance` when checking files from dependencies
- `SwiftASTManager` when reading in files that it would later replace
all inputs with
(1) would cause the AST context not to be re-used, even though nothing
had changed. (2) caused all non-completion functionality to fail for any
symbols within files only specified by the overlay.
Resolves rdar://85508213.
Previously the code completion methods just returned an `ArrayRef` that pointed into the result sink that contained the results but no effort was made to actually keep that that result sink alive, e.g. when transforming results in `transformAndForwardResults`.
Instead, return the `CodeCompletionResultSink` from the code compleiton methods now and adopt that sink from the inner results created in `transformAndForwardResults`.
Essentially, just wire up cancellation tokens and cancellation flags for `CompletionInstance` and make sure to return `CancellableResult::cancelled()` when cancellation is detected.
rdar://83391488
All users of `CompletionInstance::performOperation` have been migrated to dedicated methods. `performOperation` with its callback that needs to invoke the second pass is now an implementation detail of `CompletionInstance`.
The invocation of the code completion second pass should be implementation detail of `CompletionInstance`. Create a method on `CompletionInstance` that correctly invokes the second pass and just reutnrs the type context info results to the caller.
We had some situations left that neither returned an error, nor called the callback with results in `performOperation`. Return an error in these and adjust the tests to correctly match the error.
This refactors a bunch of code-completion methods around `performOperation` to return their results via a callback only instead of the current mixed approach of indicating failure via a return value, returning an error string as an inout parameter and success results via a callback. The new guarantee should be that the callback is always called exactly once on control flow graph.
Other than a support for passing the (currently unused) cancelled state through the different instance, there should be no functionality change.
Rather than replacing the code completion file
on the `CompilerInstance` whenever we do a cached
top-level completion, let's set a new main module
instead.
This allows us to properly update the
`LoadedModules` map, and allows the retrieval of
the code completion file to be turned into a
request.
Check if dependencies are modified since the last checking.
Dependencies:
- Other source files in the current module
- Dependent files collected by the dependency tracker
When:
- If the last dependency check was over N (defaults to 5) seconds ago
Invalidate if:
- The dependency file is missing
- The modification time of the dependecy is greater than the last check
- If the modification time is zero, compare the content using the file
system from the previous completion and the current completion
rdar://problem/62336432
if fast-completion is enabled. So they have higher chance to use the cached
completion instance.
If it's disabled, don't block, use an ephemeral instance so we can peform
multiple completions simultaneously.
To controls the lifetime of CompilerInstance within CompletionIntance.
- Prevent from using the same CompilerInstance from multiple completion
requests
- Separate the stacktrace between "fast" and "normal" completions
- Further code consolidation between various completion-like requests
- Introduce ide::CompletionInstance to manage CompilerInstance
- `CompletionInstance` vends the cached CompilerInstance when:
-- The compiler arguments (i.e. CompilerInvocation) has has not changed
-- The primary file is the same
-- The completion happens inside function bodies in both previous and
current completion
-- The interface hash of the primary file has not changed
- Otherwise, it vends a fresh CompilerInstance and cache it for the next
completion
rdar://problem/20787086
