Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dmitri Hrybenko
2bccb13463 stdlib: add an extension point for SequenceType.contains()
This makes the protocol extension as fast as static dispatch for
Set.contains().

Swift SVN r27396
2015-04-17 02:09:59 +00:00
Dmitri Hrybenko
0d6374bb58 stdlib/HashedCollections: skip computing the hash for lookups in empty
collections

Swift SVN r27395
2015-04-17 01:56:19 +00:00
Dave Abrahams
ac3f047496 [stdlib] Renaming fallout from Mirror API review
toString(x)      => String(x)
toDebugString(x) => String(reflecting: x)
Printable        => CustomStringConvertible
DebugPrintable   => CustomDebugStringConvertible

Also updated comments to clarify these protocols

Swift SVN r27090
2015-04-07 20:32:26 +00:00
Chris Lattner
7b13a367a7 clean up some uses of typed patterns in nested contexts. The only reason anyone was using
them was because of the obsolete AnyObject warning.


Swift SVN r26159
2015-03-15 18:26:24 +00:00
Chris Lattner
20f8f09ea8 Land: <rdar://problem/19382905> improve 'if let' to support refutable patterns and untie it from optionals
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.

Where before you might have written:
  if let x = foo() {

you now need to write:
  if let x? = foo() {
    
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.

To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?.  It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.

For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error.  This means that you'll get:

t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
       ^
        ?

I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time.  I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.

In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).




Swift SVN r26150
2015-03-15 07:06:22 +00:00
Graham Batty
388f0dd5de Check if existing capacity is enough even on non-objc.
Fixes rdar://problem/20089729

Swift SVN r26109
2015-03-13 20:14:20 +00:00
Dmitri Hrybenko
350248dae5 Reorganize the directory structure under 'stdlib'
The standard library has grown significantly, and we need a new
directory structure that clearly reflects the role of the APIs, and
allows future growth.

See stdlib/{public,internal,private}/README.txt for more information.

Swift SVN r25876
2015-03-09 05:26:05 +00:00