@objc methods, initializers, deinitializers, properties, and
subscripts all produce Objective-C methods. Diagnose cases where two
such entities (which may be of different kinds) produce the same
Objective-C method in the same class.
As a special exception, one can have an Objective-C method in an
extension that conflicts with an Objective-C method in the original
class definition, so long as the original class definition is from a
different model. This reflects the reality in Objective-C that the
category definition wins over the original definition, and is used in
at least one overlay (SpriteKit).
This is the first part of rdar://problem/18391046; the second part
involves checking that overrides are sane.
Swift SVN r23147
reserve ? itself as a special token that cannot be defined (protecting ternary, postfix ?,
etc) but add some defensive code to prevent people from defining those operators.
<rdar://problem/17923322> allow ? as a general operator character
Swift SVN r21051
Perform redeclaration checking of global and type-member declarations
at the time of declaration, using a notion of the signature of a
declaration to determine when one declaration is a redeclaration of
another. See ValueDecl::getOverloadSignature() and
conflicting(OverloadSignature, OverloadSignature) for the specific
rules we implement. In a nutshell:
- For functions, the signature includes:
+ The full name (which includes argument names)
+ The interface type
+ Whether the function is a class/static or instance method
+ For an operator, whether it is prefix or postfix
- For a subscript, the signature is the interface type
- For everything else, the signature is just the name
This tightens the rules in a number of ways, which is reflected in the
test case churn:
- We now properly perform redeclaration checking for generics
- We now propertly handle API argument names for functions
- We now ban overloading between two variables of the same name but
different type
- We now ban overloading between a variable/property and a function
- We now ban overloading for initializers
The two test cases of actual interest are:
test/decl/overload.swift: A bunch of new test cases for our checking
test/Constraints/members.swift: I commented out a useful test for
now, because it relies on overloading between a property and a
function. We can reconsistute this test with a couple of modules.
This commit fixes at least a half dozen radars under the umbrella
<rdar://problem/11212777>. I still need to check them individually to
close them out.
Swift SVN r16691
We have to work with selectors quite often, so provide an efficient
representation for them. Switch ObjCAttr over to this representation,
which has the nice property that it efficiently represents implicit
@objc attributes with names and allows us to overwrite the Objective-C
name without losing all source information. Addresses
<rdar://problem/16478678>, and sets us up for dealing with selectors
better.
Swift SVN r16327
Swift will use the basename + argument names formulation for
names. Update the DeclName interfaces, printing, and __FUNCTION__ to
use the method syntax.
We'll still need to rework the "x.foo:bar:wibble:" syntax; that will
come (significantly) later.
Swift SVN r15763
Resolve selector references using compound name lookup, pushing DeclNames a bit deeper through the type-checker and diagnostics as necessary.
Swift SVN r14791
Make the name lookup interfaces all take DeclNames instead of identifiers, and update the lookup caches of the various file units to index their members by both compound name and simple name. Serialized modules are keyed by identifiers, so as a transitional hack, do simple name lookup then filter the results by compound name.
Swift SVN r14768
the result of the string_literal instruction.
This fixes:
<rdar://problem/15883849> Diagnostic CCP should be able to fold operations on string_literal lengths
I will follow up with cleanups this enables.
Swift SVN r13361
Introduces very basic support for diagnosing ambiguous expressions,
where the source of the ambiguity is a reference to an overloaded
name. Simple example:
t.swift:4:1: error: ambiguous use of 'f0'
f0(1, 2)
^
t.swift:1:6: note: found this candidate
func f0(i : Int, d : Double) {}
^
t.swift:2:6: note: found this candidate
func f0(d : Double, i : Int) {}
^
There's a lot of work needed to make this cleaner, but perhaps it will
ease the pain of developing the library <rdar://problem/14277889>.
Swift SVN r6195
Remove '@' from the operator character set, but add the math, symbol, punctuation, arrow, and line- and box-drawing characters. Also allow operators to contain (but not start with) combining characters--this should be safe, because identifiers can't start with combining characters either, and we don't allow them anywhere else.
Swift SVN r5019
Sever the last load-bearing link between SILFunction and SILConstant by naming SILFunctions with their mangled symbol names. Move the core of the mangler up to SIL, and teach SILGen how to use it to mangle a SILConstant.
Swift SVN r4964
This has the side-effect that you can't explicitly refer to an operator* with "swift.*", etc., but per discussion with Doug, that's probably okay.
Swift SVN r1443
setting all fields on construction. Use this opportunity to save a
pointer of storage for every DeclVarName.
squeeze out a pointer's worth of storage
Swift SVN r639
