We were waiting to delete old apply / try_apply instructions until after
fully specializing all the apply / try_apply in the function. This is
problematic when we have a recursive call and specializing the function
that we're currently processing, since we end up cloning the function
with the old apply / try_apply present.
Rather than doing this, clean up the old apply / try_apply immediately
after processing each one.
Resolves SR-1114 / rdar://problem/25455308.
Do not specialize an apply/partial_apply that we've already added to the
set of dead instructions. Doing so can result in creating a new
instruction which we will leave around, and which will have a type
mismatch in its parameter list.
Fixes rdar://problem/25447450.
We ended up adding the same instruction twice to a SmallVector of
instructions to be deleted. To avoid this, we'll track these
to-be-deleted instructions in a SmallSetVector instead.
We were also failing to add an instruction that we can delete to the set
of instructions to be deleted, so I fixed that as well.
I've added a test case, but it's currently disabled because fixing this
turned up another issue in the same code which I still need to take a
look at.
Fixes rdar://problem/25369617.
We were giving special handling to ApplyInst when we were attempting to use
getMemoryBehavior(). This commit changes the special handling to work on all
full apply sites instead of just AI. Additionally, we look through partial
applies and thin to thick functions.
I also added a dumper called BasicInstructionPropertyDumper that just dumps the
results of SILInstruction::get{Memory,Releasing}Behavior() for all instructions
in order to verify this behavior.
With this re-abstraction a specialized function has the same calling convention as if it would have been written with the specialized types in the first place.
In general this results in less alloc_stacks and load/stores.
It also can eliminate some re-abstraction thunks, e.g. if a generic closure is used in a non-generic context.
It some (hopefully rare) cases it may require to add re-abstraction thunks.
In case a function has multiple indirect results, only the first is converted to a direct result. This is an open TODO.
Begin unbundling devirtualization, specialization, and inlining by
recreating the stand-alone generic specializer pass.
I've added a use of the pass to the pipeline, but this is almost
certainly not going to be the final location of where it runs. It's
primarily there to ensure this code gets exercised.
Since this is running prior to inlining, it changes the order that some
functions are specialized in, which means differences in the order of
output of one of the tests (one which similarly changed when
devirtualization, specialization, and inlining were bundled together).
