The parser used to rewrite
if let x: T
into
if let x: T?
This transformation is correct at face value, but relied on being able
to construct TypeReprs with bogus source locations. Instead of having
the parser kick semantic analysis into shape, let's perform this
reinterpretation when we resolve if-let patterns in statement
conditions.
that allows arbitrary `label: {}` suffixes after an initial
unlabeled closure.
Type-checking is not yet correct, as well as code-completion
and other kinds of tooling.
Accept trailing closures in following form:
```swift
foo {
<label-1>: { ... }
<label-2>: { ... }
...
<label-N>: { ... }
}
```
Consider each labeled block to be a regular argument to a call or subscript,
so the result of parser looks like this:
```swift
foo(<label-1>: { ... }, ..., <label-N>: { ... })
```
Note that in this example parens surrounding parameter list are implicit
and for the cases when they are given by the user e.g.
```swift
foo(bar) {
<label-1>: { ... }
...
}
```
location of `)` is changed to a location of `}` to make sure that call
"covers" all of the transformed arguments and parser result would look
like this:
```swift
foo(bar,
<label-1>: { ... }
)
```
Resolves: rdar://problem/59203764
Also extend returned object from simplify being an expression to
`TrailingClosure` which has a label, label's source location and
associated closure expression.
Like switch cases, a catch clause may now include a comma-
separated list of patterns. The body will be executed if any
one of those patterns is matched.
This patch replaces `CatchStmt` with `CaseStmt` as the children
of `DoCatchStmt` in the AST. This necessitates a number of changes
throughout the compiler, including:
- Parser & libsyntax support for the new syntax and AST structure
- Typechecking of multi-pattern catches, including those which
contain bindings.
- SILGen support
- Code completion updates
- Profiler updates
- Name lookup changes
This restructures the indentation logic around producing a single IndentContext
for the line being indented. An IndentContext has:
- a ContextLoc, which points to a source location to indent relative to,
- a Kind, indicating whether we should align with that location exactly, or
with the start of the content on its containing line, and
- an IndentLevel with the relative number of levels to indent by.
It also improves the handling of:
- chained and nested parens, braces, square brackets and angle brackets, and
how those interact with the exact alignment of parameters, call arguments,
and tuple, array and dictionary elements.
- Indenting to the correct level after an incomplete expression, statement or
decl.
Resolves:
rdar://problem/59135010
rdar://problem/25519439
rdar://problem/50137394
rdar://problem/48410444
rdar://problem/48643521
rdar://problem/42171947
rdar://problem/40130724
rdar://problem/41405163
rdar://problem/39367027
rdar://problem/36332430
rdar://problem/34464828
rdar://problem/33113738
rdar://problem/32314354
rdar://problem/30106520
rdar://problem/29773848
rdar://problem/27301544
rdar://problem/27776466
rdar://problem/27230819
rdar://problem/25490868
rdar://problem/23482354
rdar://problem/20193017
rdar://problem/47117735
rdar://problem/55950781
rdar://problem/55939440
rdar://problem/53247352
rdar://problem/54326612
rdar://problem/53131527
rdar://problem/48399673
rdar://problem/51361639
rdar://problem/58285950
rdar://problem/58286076
rdar://problem/53828204
rdar://problem/58286182
rdar://problem/58504167
rdar://problem/58286327
rdar://problem/53828026
rdar://problem/57623821
rdar://problem/56965360
rdar://problem/54470937
rdar://problem/55580761
rdar://problem/46928002
rdar://problem/35807378
rdar://problem/39397252
rdar://problem/26692035
rdar://problem/33760223
rdar://problem/48934744
rdar://problem/43315903
rdar://problem/24630624
Instead of interleaving typechecking and parsing
for SIL files, first parse the file for Swift
decls by skipping over any intermixed SIL decls.
Then we can perform type checking, and finally SIL
parsing where we now skip over Swift decls.
This is an intermediate step to requestifying the
parsing of a source file for its Swift decls.
SIL differentiability witnesses are a new top-level SIL construct mapping
"original" SIL functions to derivative SIL functions.
SIL differentiability witnesses have the following components:
- "Original" `SILFunction`.
- SIL linkage.
- Differentiability parameter indices (`IndexSubset`).
- Differentiability result indices (`IndexSubset`).
- Derivative `GenericSignature` representing differentiability generic
requirements (optional).
- JVP derivative `SILFunction` (optional).
- VJP derivative `SILFunction` (optional).
- "Is serialized?" bit.
This patch adds the `SILDifferentiabilityWitness` data structure, with
documentation, parsing, and printing.
Resolves TF-911.
Todos:
- TF-1136: upstream `SILDifferentiabilityWitness` serialization.
- TF-1137: upstream `SILDifferentiabilityWitness` verification.
- TF-1138: upstream `SILDifferentiabilityWitness` SILGen from
`@differentiable` and `@derivative` attributes.
- TF-20: robust mangling for `SILDifferentiabilityWitness` names.
Improve diagnostics for labeled block without 'do'.
Parse and diagnose { identifier ':' '{' } as a labeled 'do' statement.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3867
Well, this does nothing. It just set the parser position twice and calls
the consumer's 'handleResults()' without any reason.
It seems it was intended to be a "fallback" completion, but it was never
implemented properly. So just remove it for now.
rdar://problem/58102910
- Rename code completion related names in 'PersistentParserState' so
it's clear when you are using.
- Refactor 'performCodeCompletionSecondPass()': Inline and consolidate
'parse*Delayed()' because they used to share many code.
rdar://problem/56926367
There were a few places discarding recorded syntax:
- '#<code-complete>' at top-level (this should be parsed as UnknownDecl).
- 'typealias' decl with inheritance clause in protocol decl.
When we requestify `getInitKind`, we don't want to invoke the request during parsing. What the parsing code
really cares about is whether or not the decl has `ConvenienceAttr`.
When the parser wires up the body of a function, it's a legitimate use of
setting a parsed body. Separate these out from the other uses of
setBody() that we want to eliminate over time.
A number of callers to AbstractFunctionDecl::getBody() were only
extracting the source range of the body... which can be retrieved more
efficiently with getBodySourceRange().
- When parsing a type or extension declaration, attempt to parse a function or property declaration when meeting an identifier, an operator or a paren (for tuple declarations).
- Produce the diagnostic with a fix-it suggesting to insert the needed keyword
- Recover parsing as if the declaration with the missing keyword is a function/property declaration
Resolves https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-10477
This is a step in the direction of fixing the fallthrough bug. Specifically, in
this commit I give case stmts a set of var decls for the bodies of the case
statement. I have not wired them up to anything except the var decl
list/typechecking.
rdar://47467128
We weren't renaming all occurrences of 'x' in the cases like the below:
case .first(let x), .second(let x):
print("foo \(x)")
fallthrough
case .third(let x):
print("bar \(x)")
We would previously only rename occurrences within the case statement the query
was made in (ignoring fallthroughs) and for cases with multiple patterns (as in
the first case above) we would only rename the occurrence in the first pattern.
When completing in the only expression of closure, use the return type
of the closure as the type context for the code-completion. However,
since code-completion may be on an incomplete input, we only use the
return type to improve the quality of the result, not to mark it
invalid, since (a) we may add another statement afterwards, or (b) if
the context type is Void it doesn't need to match the value.
