We ended up adding the same instruction twice to a SmallVector of
instructions to be deleted. To avoid this, we'll track these
to-be-deleted instructions in a SmallSetVector instead.
We were also failing to add an instruction that we can delete to the set
of instructions to be deleted, so I fixed that as well.
I've added a test case, but it's currently disabled because fixing this
turned up another issue in the same code which I still need to take a
look at.
Fixes rdar://problem/25369617.
Reinstates commit 0c2ca94ef7
With two bug fixes:
*) use after free asan crash
*) wrong check in ValueLifetimeAnalysis::isWithinLifetime
And some refactoring
For a release on a guaranteed function paramater, we know right away
that its not the final release and therefore does not call deinit.
Therefore we know it does not read or write memory other than the reference
count.
This reduces the compilation time of dead store and redundant load elim. As
we need to go over alias analysis to make sure tracked locations do not alias
with it.
This is done by splitting the transformation into an analysis phase and a transformation phase (which does not use the dominator tree anymore).
The domintator tree is recalucated once after the whole function is processed.
This change eventually solves the compile time problem of rdar://problem/24410167.
SILValue.h/.cpp just defines the SIL base classes. Referring to specific instructions is a (small) kind of layering violation.
Also I want to keep SILValue small so that it is really just a type alias of ValueBase*.
NFC.
As there are no instructions left which produce multiple result values, this is a NFC regarding the generated SIL and generated code.
Although this commit is large, most changes are straightforward adoptions to the changes in the ValueBase and SILValue classes.
And use project_box to get to the address value.
SILGen now generates a project_box for each alloc_box.
And IRGen re-uses the address value from the alloc_box if the operand of project_box is an alloc_box.
This lets the generated code be the same as before.
Other than that most changes of this (quite large) commit are straightforward.
(Headers first)
It has been generally agreed that we need to do this reorg, and now
seems like the perfect time. Some major pass reorganization is in the
works.
This does not have to be the final word on the matter. The consensus
among those working on the code is that it's much better than what we
had and a better starting point for future bike shedding.
Note that the previous organization was designed to allow separate
analysis and optimization libraries. It turns out this is an
artificial distinction and not an important goal.
