...specifically, diagnosed in the parent DiagnosticEngine. This not
only provides a better user experience, but makes sure that the
compiler exits with a nonzero exit code even if the module goes
unused.
rdar://problem/50789839
Add `llvm_unreachable` to mark covered switches which MSVC does not
analyze correctly and believes that there exists a path through the
function without a return value.
Similar to 517f5d6b6a, the "shadowed" terminology didn't end up
describing the most common use of the feature; there is pretty much no
intended case where a Swift module shadows a Clang module without also
re-exporting it. Switch to "underlying", which was already in use in a
few places, and which better parallels "overlay".
No intended functionality change.
Previously 'isSystemModule()' returns true only if the module is:
- Standard library
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
Now:
- Clang module and that is `IsSystem`; or
- Swift overlay for clang `IsSystem` module
- Swift module found in either of these directories:
- Runtime library directoris (including stdlib)
- Frameworks in `-Fsystem` directories
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/System/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
- Frameworks in `$SDKROOT/Library/Frameworks/` (Darwin)
rdar://problem/50516314
form SerializedModuleLoader into its own ModuleLoader class. (NFC-ish)
This gives better control over the order in which the various module
load mechanisms are applied.
When printing a swiftinterface, represent opaque result types using an attribute that refers to
the mangled name of the defining decl for the opaque type. To turn this back into a reference
to the right decl's implicit OpaqueTypeDecl, use type reconstruction. Since type reconstruction
doesn't normally concern itself with non-type decls, set up a lookup table in SourceFiles and
ModuleFiles to let us handle the mapping from mangled name to opaque type decl in type
reconstruction.
(Since we're invoking type reconstruction during type checking, when the module hasn't yet been
fully validated, we need to plumb a LazyResolver into the ASTBuilder in an unsightly way. Maybe
there's a better way to do this... Longer term, at least, this surface design gives space for
doing things more the right way--a more request-ified decl validator ought to be able to naturally
lazily service this request without the LazyResolver reference, and if type reconstruction in
the future learns how to reconstruct non-type decls, then the lookup tables can go away.)
When a Swift module built with debug info imports a library without
debug info from a textual interface, the textual interface is
necessary to reconstruct types defined in the library's interface. By
recording the Swift interface files in DWARF dsymutil can collect them
and LLDB can find them.
rdar://problem/49751363
Previously, the ParseableInterfaceModuleLoader relied on the assumption
that, if it returned `errc::not_supported`, it would fall through the
search paths and then move on to the SerializedModuleLoader. This did
not anticipate the possibility of a valid .swiftinterface coming later
in the search paths, which can cause issues for the standard library
which is in the resource-dir and should always be loaded from there.
Instead, make the module loading explicitly short-circuit when seeing
`errc::not_supported`, and document it.
Also add some more logging throughout `discoverLoadableModule` so we can
more easily catch issues like this in the future.
Fixes rdar://49479386
This patch modifies ParseableInterfaceBuilder::CollectDepsForSerialization to
avoid serializing dependencies from the runtime resource path into the
swiftmodules generated from .swiftinterface files. This means the module cache
should now be relocatable across machines.
It also modifies ParseableInterfaceModuleLoader to never add any dependencies
from the module cache and prebuilt cache to the dependency tracker (in addition
to the existing behaviour of not serializing them in the generated
swiftmodules). As a result, CollectDepsForSerialization no longer checks if the
dependencies it is given come from the cache as they are provided by the
dependency tracker. It now asserts that's the case instead.
When we build incrementally, we produce "partial swiftmodules" for
each input source file, then merge them together into the final
compiled module that, among other things, gets used for debugging.
Without this, we'd drop @_implementationOnly imports and any types
from the modules that were imported during the module-merging step
and then be unable to debug those types
This is an attribute that gets put on an import in library FooKit to
keep it from being a requirement to import FooKit. It's not checked at
all, meaning that in this form it is up to the author of FooKit to
make sure nothing in its API or ABI depends on the implementation-only
dependency. There's also no debugging support here (debugging FooKit
/should/ import the implementation-only dependency if it's present).
The goal is to get to a point where it /can/ be checked, i.e. FooKit
developers are prevented from writing code that would rely on FooKit's
implementation-only dependency being present when compiling clients of
FooKit. But right now it's not.
rdar://problem/48985979
...in preparation for me adding a third kind of import, making the
existing "All" kind a problem. NFC, except that I did rewrite the
ClangModuleUnit implementation of getImportedModules to be simpler!
In addition to being wasteful, this is a correctness issue -- the
compiler should only ever have one view of this file, and it should not
read a potentially different file after validating dependencies.
rdar://48654608
Replaces SearchPathOptions::RuntimeLibraryImportPath with an equivalent std::vector of paths. Also reimplements SearchPathOptions::SkipRuntimeLibraryImportPaths to cause the list of runtime library import paths to be empty, rather than exiting early from SerializedModuleLoader::findModule().
When loading a module supporting multiple targets, the module loader now looks for a file named with a normalized version of the target triple first, and only falls back to the architecture name if the normalized triple is not found.
This changes the Swift resource directory from looking like
lib/
swift/
macosx/
libswiftCore.dylib
libswiftDarwin.dylib
x86_64/
Swift.swiftmodule
Swift.swiftdoc
Darwin.swiftmodule
Darwin.swiftdoc
to
lib/
swift/
macosx/
libswiftCore.dylib
libswiftDarwin.dylib
Swift.swiftmodule/
x86_64.swiftmodule
x86_64.swiftdoc
Darwin.swiftmodule/
x86_64.swiftmodule
x86_64.swiftdoc
matching the layout we use for multi-architecture swiftmodules
everywhere else (particularly frameworks).
There's no change in this commit to how Linux swiftmodules are
packaged. There's been past interest in going the /opposite/ direction
for Linux, since there's not standard support for fat
(multi-architecture) .so libraries. Moving the .so search path /down/
to an architecture-specific directory on Linux would allow the same
resource directory to be used for both host-compiling and
cross-compiling.
rdar://problem/43545560
The previous 'openModuleFiles' interface in SerializedModuleLoaderBase
still assumed that swiftmodule files and swiftdoc files would be found
next to each other, but that's not true anymore with
swiftinterfaces-built-to-modules. Give up on this assumption (and on
the minor optimization of passing down a scratch buffer) and split out
the interface into the customization point
'findModuleFilesInDirectory' and the implementation 'openModuleFiles'.
The latter now takes two full paths: one for the swiftmodule, one for
the swiftdoc.
- Use the name for the cached module, so that we don't end up with a
zillion "x86_64-XXXXXXXX.swiftmodule" files in the cache when we're
working with architecture-specific swiftmodules.
- Diagnose if the expected name is different from the name specified
in the swiftinterface.
- Emit all diagnostics at the location of the import, instead of
without any location at all.
Previously these used the same "major architecture" names that the
`#if os(...)` query accepts, but that can be a problem when building
for, say, both armv7 and armv7s, even if the content is "the same".
For a transition period where external build tools are involved, the
compiler will look for "arm.swiftmodule" if it fails to find
"armv7.swiftmodule" or any other 32-bit ARM architecture. No other
Apple platform architectures are affected, and AFAIK no one's using
the architecture-based layout on Linux or any other platforms.
rdar://problem/45174692
This diagnostic needs to be adapted for swiftinterfaces too, but
meanwhile let's not have it get in the way when dealing with a
multi-architecture module that has parseable interfaces.
MyKit.framework/
Modules/
MyKit.swiftmodule/
x86_64.swiftinterface
x86_64.swiftdoc
# no x86_64.swiftmodule
A module compiled with `-enable-private-imports` allows other modules to
import private declarations if the importing source file uses an
``@_private(from: "SourceFile.swift") import statement.
rdar://29318654
Added the 'Module::getPrecedenceGroups' API to separate precedence group lookup
from 'Module::lookupVisibleDecls', which together with 'FileUnit::lookupVisibleDecls',
to which the former is forwarded, are expected to look up only 'ValueDecl'. In particular, this
prevents completions like Module.PrecedenceGroup.
Before:
module file's minimum deployment target is iOS 12.0:
/path/to/FooKit.swiftmodule
After:
compiling for iOS 11.0, but module 'FooKit' has a minimum deployment
target of iOS 12.0: /path/to/FooKit.swiftmodule
Also tweak the "incompatible target" error to include the module name.
rdar://problem/35546499
Adds the -vfsoverlay frontend option that enables the user to pass
VFS overlay YAML files to Swift. These files define a (potentially
many-layered) virtual mapping on which we predicate a VFS.
Switch all input-based memory buffer reads in the Frontend to the new
FileSystem-based approach.
Previously: "module compiled with Swift 4.1 cannot be imported in Swift
4.1.50" (i.e. following the -swift-version flag)
Now: "module compiled with Swift 4.1 cannot be imported by the Swift
4.2 compiler"
I'm pretty sure this is what I intended to do all along, and I just
messed it up when I originally implemented it. This is especially
important when working with downloadable toolchains, which would say
"module compiled with Swift 4.2 cannot be imported in Swift 4.1.50",
which is not really the problem at all. Now it'll fall back to the
more generic "module file was created by an older version of the
compiler" error.
Introduce a command-line option to visualize the complete set of output
request dependencies evaluated by a particular compile action. This is
exposing existing visualization facilities to the (-frontend) command line.
