Introduce a new loading restriction that is more strict than the serialization
version check on swiftmodules. Tagged compilers will only load
library-evolution enabled swiftmodules that are produced by a compiler with the
exact same revision id. This will be more reliable in production
environments than using the serialization version which we forgot to
update from time to time. This shouldn't affect development compilers that
will still load any module with a compatible serialization version.
rdar://83105234
Serialize the canonical name of the SDK used when building a swiftmodule
file and use it to ensure that the swiftmodule file is loaded only with
the same SDK. The SDK name must be passed down from the frontend.
This will report unsupported configurations like:
- Installing roots between incompatible SDKs without deleting the
swiftmodule files.
- Having multiple targets in the same project using different SDKs.
- Loading a swiftmodule created with a newer SDK (and stdlib) with an
older SDK.
All of these lead to hard to investigate deserialization failures and
this change should detect them early, before reaching a deserialization
failure.
rdar://78048939
Support for addresses with arbitrary alignment as opposed to their
element type's natural in-memory alignment.
Required for bytestream encoding/decoding without resorting to memcpy.
SIL instruction flag, documentation, printing, parsing, serialization,
and IRGen.
This assertion does not account for the fact that a particular
requirement can be imported both as async and with a completion
handler, and therefore one of those two views won't have a witness.
The assertion is no longer catching anything useful, so remove it.
Addresses rdar://77684000.
The following regression test added for this feature is not passing:
Swift(linux-x86_64) :: decl/protocol/protocols_with_self_or_assoc_reqs_executable.swift
with a compiler crash happening during SILFunctionTransform "Devirtualizer".
Reverting to unblock CI.
This reverts commit f96057e260, reversing
changes made to 3fc18f3603.
A type dependencies are used at deserialization to drop a protocol early
when a dependency is not deserializable. Dependencies on protocols via a
protocol composition were not taken into account. This lead to the
deserialization process failing later. Fix the serialization process to
write protocol dependencies too.
rdar://78631465
Rework Sendable checking to be completely based on "missing"
conformances, so that we can individually diagnose missing Sendable
conformances based on both the module in which the conformance check
happened as well as where the type was declared. The basic rules here
are to only diagnose if either the module where the non-Sendable type
was declared or the module where it was checked was compiled with a
mode that consistently diagnoses `Sendable`, either by virtue of
being Swift 6 or because `-warn-concurrency` was provided on the
command line. And have that diagnostic be an error in Swift 6 or
warning in Swift 5.x.
There is much tuning to be done here.
We used to represent the interface type of variadic parameters directly
with ArraySliceType. This was awfully convenient for the constraint
solver since it could just canonicalize and open [T] to Array<$T>
wherever it saw a variadic parameter. However, this both destroys the
sugaring of T... and locks the representation to Array<T>. In the
interest of generalizing this in the future, introduce
VariadicSequenceType. For now, it canonicalizes to Array<T> just like
the old representation. But, as you can guess, this is a new staging
point for teaching the solver how to munge variadic generic type bindings.
rdar://81628287
7856f2d83d only partially skipped writing
out destructors when they were invalid, ie. it skipped writing the decl
itself but not the records common to all decls. This would cause any
records on the destructor to be applied on the next serialized decl.
Make sure to skip serializing anything to do with the destructor when
it's invalid and does not have a class context.
Designated types were removed from the constraint solver in #34315, but they are currently still represented in the AST and fully checked. This change removes them as completely as possible without breaking source compatibility (mainly with old swiftinterfaces) or changing the SwiftSyntax tree. Designated types are still parsed, but they are dropped immediately and a warning is diagnosed. During decl checking we also still check if the precedence group is really a designated type, but only so that we can diagnose a warning and fall back to DefaultPrecedence.
This change also fixes an apparent bug in the parser where we did not diagnose operator declarations that contained a `:` followed by a non-identifier token.
When looking up a conformance to Sendable fails, implicitly create a
"missing" builtin conformance. Such conformances allow type checking
to continue even in the presence of Sendable-related problems.
Diagnose these missing conformances when they are used in an actual
program, as part of availability checking for conformances and when we
are determining Sendability. This allows us to decide between an
error, a warning, and suppressing the diagnostic entirely without
affecting how the program is compiled. This is a step toward enabling
selective enforcement of Sendable.
Part of rdar://78269348.
Instead of a new attribute `@completionHandlerAsync`, allow the use of
the existing `renamed` parameter of `@available` to specify the
asynchronous alternative of a synchronous function.
No errors will be output from invalid names as `@completionHandlerAsync`
had, but if a function is correctly matched then it will be used to
output warnings when using the synchronous function in an asynchronous
context (as before).
Resolves rdar://80612731
Give BuiltinProtocolConformance a generic signature, which can be used to
describe the generic parameters used within the builtin conformance, e.g.,
`<T1, T2, T3>` for a tuple type `(T1, T2, T3)`. Also store the
conditional requirements as trailing objects, requiring them to be
precomputed by whatever builds the conformances. Together, this means
that builtin protocol conformances act like normal conformances with
respect to conditional requirements and substitutions: they will be
defined generically, then a specialized conformance will be layered on
top to provide the substitutions.
Start treating the null {Can}GenericSignature as a regular signature
with no requirements and no parameters. This not only makes for a much
safer abstraction, but allows us to simplify a lot of the clients of
GenericSignature that would previously have to check for null before
using the abstraction.
This code path can report compiler inconsistencies, so let's make the
pretty stacktrace more useful when debugging. We probably want to make
the assert on witness.getDecl() a hard error too, but this would break
existing projects at this time.
Parse and provide semantic checking for '@unchecked Sendable', for a
Sendable conformance that doesn't perform additional semantic checks
for correctness.
Part of rdar://78269000.
Foundation imports CoreFoundation with `@_implementationOnly`,
so CoreFoundation's modulemap won't be read, and the dependent libraries
of CoreFoundation will not be automatically linked when using static
linking.
For example, CoreFoundation depends on libicui18n and it's modulemap has
`link "icui18n"` statement. If Foundation imports CoreFoundation with
`@_implementationOnly` as a private dependency, the toolchain doesn't have
CoreFoundation's modulemap and Foundation's swiftmodule doesn't import
CoreFoundation. So the swiftc can't know that libicui18n is required.
This new option will add LINK_LIBRARY entry in swiftmodule to
specify dependent libraries (in the example case, Foundation's
swiftmodule should have LINK_LIBRARY entry of libicui18n)
See also: [Autolinking behavior of @_implementationOnly with static linking](https://forums.swift.org/t/autolinking-behavior-of-implementationonly-with-static-linking/44393)
