Non-actor isolated synchronous functions were previously
allowed to call & reference global-actor isolated declarations.
This patch puts a stop to that.
Resolves rdar://71548470
Adds a new 'key.retrieve_symbol_graph' option to the request. When set to 1 it
includes the JSON for a SymbolGraph containing a single node for the symbol at
the requested position.
This also extends the SymbolGraph library with a new entry point to get a graph
for a single symbol, and to additionally support type substitution to match the
existing CursorInfo behavior (e.g. so that when invoked on `first` in
`Array<Int>().first`, the type is given as `Int?` rather than `Element?`).
Resolves rdar://problem/70551509
Clang types need special treatment because multiple Clang modules can contain the same type declarations from a textually included header, but not all of these modules may be visible.
This fixes
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-13032
The newly added test breaks without this fix.
We're going to play a dirty, dirty trick - but it'll make our users'
lives better in the end so stick with me here.
In order to build up an incremental compilation, we need two sources of
dependency information:
1) "Priors" - Swiftdeps with dependency information from the past
build(s)
2) "Posteriors" - Swiftdeps with dependencies from after we rebuild the
file or module or whatever
With normal swift files built in incremental mode, the priors are given by the
swiftdeps files which are generated parallel to a swift file and usually
placed in the build directory alongside the object files. Because we
have entries in the output file map, we can always know where these
swiftdeps files are. The priors are integrated by the driver and then
the build is scheduled. As the build runs and jobs complete, their
swiftdeps are reloaded and re-integrated. The resulting changes are then
traversed and more jobs are scheduled if necessary. These give us the
posteriors we desire.
A module flips this on its head. The swiftdeps information serialized
in a module functions as the *posterior* since the driver consuming the
module has no way of knowing how to rebuild the module, and because its
dependencies are, for all intents and purposes, fixed in time. The
missing piece of the puzzle is the priors. That is, we need some way of
knowing what the "past" interface of the module looked like so we can
compare it to the "present" interface. Moreover, we need to always know
where to look for these priors.
We solve this problem by serializing a file alongside the build record:
the "external" build record. This is given by a... creative encoding
of multiple source file dependency graphs into a single source file
dependency graph. The rough structure of this is:
SourceFile => interface <BUILD_RECORD>.external
| - Incremental External Dependency => interface <MODULE_1>.swiftmodule
| | - <dependency> ...
| | - <dependency> ...
| | - <dependency> ...
| - Incremental External Dependency => interface <MODULE_2>.swiftmodule
| | - <dependency> ...
| | - <dependency> ...
| - Incremental External Dependency => interface <MODULE_3>.swiftmodule
| - ...
Sorta, `cat`'ing a bunch of source file dependency graphs together but
with incremental external dependency nodes acting as glue.
Now for the trick:
We have to unpack this structure and integrate it to get our priors.
This is easy. The tricky bit comes in integrate itself. Because the
top-level source file node points directly at the external build record,
not the original swift modules that defined these dependency nodes, we
swap the key it wants to use (the external build record) for the
incremental external dependency acting as the "parent" of the dependency
node. We do this by following the arc we carefully laid down in the
structure above.
For rdar://69595010
Goes a long way towards rdar://48955139, rdar://64238133
It would be more abstractly correct if this got DI support so
that we destroy the member if the constructor terminates
abnormally, but we can get to that later.
We expect to iterate on this quite a bit, both publicly
and internally, but this is a fine starting-point.
I've renamed runAsync to runAsyncAndBlock to underline
very clearly what it does and why it's not long for this
world. I've also had to give it a radically different
implementation in an effort to make it continue to work
given an actor implementation that is no longer just
running all work synchronously.
The major remaining bit of actor-scheduling work is to
make swift_task_enqueue actually do something sensible
based on the executor it's been given; currently it's
expecting a flag that IRGen simply doesn't know to set.
As a step towards making binding inference more incremental, let's
make producer responsible for adding hole type binding instead of
doing so in `finalize`.
In order to extract the module dependency graph from the compilation the driver just ran, define a separate semantic type to hold a result code and the graph itself.
Wrapping bindings into optional type based on presence of
an `ExpressibleByNilLiteral` conformance requirement should
be done after type variable has been selected for attempting.
Otherwise such upfront work would be wasteful since it doesn't
affect binding ranking in any way.
This is a generic API that when ownership is enabled allows one to replace all
uses of a value with a value with a differing ownership by transforming/lifetime
extending as appropriate.
This API supports all pairings of ownership /except/ replacing a value with
OwnershipKind::None with a value without OwnershipKind::None. This is a more
complex optimization that we do not support today. As a result, we include on
our state struct a helper routine that callers can use to know if the two values
that they want to process can be handled by the algorithm.
My moticiation is to use this to to update InstSimplify and SILCombiner in a
less bug prone way rather than just turn stuff off.
Noting that this transformation inserts ownership instructions, I have made sure
to test this API in two ways:
1. With Mandatory Combiner alone (to make sure it works period).
2. With Mandatory Combiner + Semantic ARC Opts to make sure that we can
eliminate the extra ownership instructions it inserts.
As one can see from the tests, the optimizer today is able to handle all of
these transforms except one conditional case where I need to eliminate a dead
phi arg. I have a separate branch that hits that today but I have exposed unsafe
behavior in ClosureLifetimeFixup that I need to fix first before I can land
that. I don't want that to stop this PR since I think the current low level ARC
optimizer may be able to help me here since this is a simple transform it does
all of the time.
Replaces `InvolvesTypeVariables` flag with a set of adjacent type
variables found during binding inference.
This approach is more suitable for incremental binding computation
because it allows to maintain a list of type variables that affect
ranking and check whether something has been resolved without having
to re-evaluate constraints associated with the given type variable.
Bridging an async Swift method back to an ObjC completion-handler-based API requires
that the ObjC thunk spawn a task on which to execute the Swift async API and pass
its results back on to the completion handler.
If the specialized function has a re-abstracted (= converted from indirect to direct) resilient argument or return types, use an alternative mangling: "TB" instead of "Tg".
Resilient parameters/returns can be converted from indirect to direct if the specialization is created within the type's resilience domain, i.e. in its module (where the type is loadable).
In this case we need to generate a different mangled name for the specialized function to distinguish it from specializations in other modules, which cannot re-abstract this resilient type.
This fixes a miscompile resulting from ODR-linking specializations from different modules, which in fact have different function signatures.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-13900
rdar://71914016
