These sets are _much_ more efficient than `Set<Value>` and `Set<Instruction>` because they bridge to the efficient `NodeSet`.
Insertions/deletions are just bit operations.
It's used to implement `InstructionSet` and `ValueSet`: sets of SILValues and SILInstructions.
Just like `BasicBlockSet` for basic blocks, the set is implemented by setting bits directly in SILNode.
This is super efficient because insertion and deletion to/from the set are basic bit operations.
The cost is an additional word in SILNode. But this is basically negligible: it just adds ~0.7% of memory used for SILInstructions.
In my experiments, I didn't see any relevant changes in memory consumption or compile time.
* add `BasicBlockSet`
* add `BasicBlockWorklist`
* add `BasicBlockRange`, which defines a range of blocks from a common dominating “begin” block to a set of “end” blocks.
* add `InstructionRange`, which is similar to `BasicBlockRange`, just on instruction level. It can be used for value lifetime analysis.
* rename `StackList` -> `Stack` and move it to `Optimizer/DataStructures`
* rename `PassContext.passContext` to `PassContext._bridged`
* add notify-functions to PassContext
