member of an object. This expression kind is currently used to refer
to properties within an object, but will eventually be extended to
refer to fields as well (once we make StructDecl real).
Swift SVN r1445
oneof/struct/protocol within a static method. The lookup is performed
on the metatype (as one would get when using qualified syntax
Type.member). Add tests to verify that this provides proper
overloading behavior.
As a drive-by, actually set the type of the implicit 'this' variable
during name binding for a non-static method.
Swift SVN r1394
syntax when name lookup finds multiple candidates. Overload resolution
is then used to select the best candidate and map the overloaded
member reference expression down to DotSyntaxCallExpr or
DotSyntaxBaseIgnoredExpr, as appropriate.
This implements part of <rdar://problem/11071641>, so that simple
overload resolution works, but there is still a bit of cleanup to do.
Swift SVN r1366
notion of a reference to a set of declarations. Introduce one derived
class, OverloadedDeclRefExpr, which covers the only case we currently
handle for overload resolution [*]: a direct (unqualified) reference
to an overloaded set of entities. Future subclasses should handle,
e.g., overloaded member references such as a.b or a.b.c.
[*] Ugly hacks for static methods notwithstanding
Swift SVN r1345
one that performs the coercion on the AST and produces diagnostics for
any problems, and one that simply determines whether the coercion
would succeed. The former already existed (as
TypeChecker::convertToType), while an approximation of the latter was
already implemented as Expr::getRankOfConversionTo(). Unifying these
code paths addresses several issues:
- Lots of redundancy in the code for computing these two properties,
which causes bugs. For example, Expr::getRankOfConversionTo()
wasn't able to handle literals (!).
- Determining whether a conversion is possible will need the full
power of the type checker, e.g., to deal with closures in cases
like:
func f(g : (int, int) -> int);
func h() { f({$1 + 0}); }
Although this is not handled correctly now.
I have opted not to adopt Clang's ImplicitConversionSequence (or
InitializationSequence) design, which computes a record of the steps
needed to perform the conversion/coercion and later applies those
steps, because we don't need that complexity yet. If we start
introducing more implicit conversions into the language, we'll revisit
this decision.
Swift SVN r1308
expressions when no value is required. Teach IR-gen
to emit DotSyntaxBaseIgnoredExprs as known function
references with possibly non-trivial semantics.
Undo the change to getSemanticsProvidingExpr().
Swift SVN r1238
qualifier, making sure that variables end up so-qualified by
default. Add a RequalifyExpr to capture the act of adding
qualifiers (to form a supertype) to an l-value.
Swift SVN r1236
Teach Expr::getSemanticsProvidingExpr to look through DotSyntaxBaseIgnoredExpr.
Start generating DotSyntaxBaseIgnoredExpr for all dot syntax exprs where the base is
ignored (e.g. "Builtin.mul_i32"), which preserves a lot more source location information
and is general goodness for the AST.
Swift SVN r1232
to properly represent its newly generalized role. It is formed
for things like "swift.print" where swift is a module type and is
evaluated and ignored.
Swift SVN r1230
inform conversion ranking about auto_closure, and rip out the
CR_AutoClosure implicit conversion. Our conversion ranking is
now completely trivial: we either have an identity conversion
or an invalid one - no crazy implicit conversions (still have
tuple shuffles etc though).
Swift SVN r1192
empty tuple as an argument. This should be restricted even more (rdar://10983400)
but this eliminates the most surprising cases at least.
Swift SVN r1165
- introduce the concept of qualifiers on l-value types
- teach overload resolution and coercion how to drop explicitness
- require explicitness on normal [byref] arguments
- make 'this' [byref(implicit)]
- special-case '&' as a unary operator in the parser to make it
produce an expression which type-checks as turning implicit l-values
into explicit ones.
Obvious missing pieces:
- updating LangRef
- we should really complain about ever trying to rvalue-convert an
explicit l-value
- maybe qualification should play a part in overload resolution
- we should diagnose attempts to declare unary '&' operators
- there's a test case in expressions.swift which suggests my logic is
slightly off
But I am out of time, and these will have to wait.
Swift SVN r1119
instead .
1,2d
1i
Change the 'walk' APIs to use virtual dispatch instead of
blocks. This makes it much easier to thread information
through the API, as well to extend the API to handle
recursive visiting of other structures (e.g., Decls
and Patterns).
Swift SVN r1101
A function argument clause is now one or more patterns (which
must be parenthesized and explicitly type all positions) not
separated by arrows; the first arrow then separates off the
return type.
Revisions to language reference forthcoming.
Swift SVN r1099
inconsistent (so it needs to be killed) but that we want to retain source
range information and not kill the entire subtree that contains it.
Swift SVN r1073
some redundancy in the code that always has to create an overload set
or a single declrefexpr depending on what various lookups produce.
Swift SVN r1044
a tuple with one element and no labels. This form is
treated specially in essentially every case, so it might
as well be its own expression kind.
Swift SVN r1021
