When the struct definition has no user-defined constructors, and there
is at least one instance variable, add an implicit default
constructor. This default constructor is currently empty; that's to be
fixed next.
Swift SVN r4868
Provide distinct syntax 'a as T' for coercions and 'a as! T' for unchecked downcasts, and add type-checker logic specialized to coercions and downcasts for these expressions. Change the AST representation of ExplicitCastExpr to keep the destination type as a TypeLoc rather than a subexpression, and change the names of the nodes to UncheckedDowncast and UncheckedSuperToArchetype to make their unchecked-ness explicit and disambiguate them from future checked casts.
In order to keep the changes staged, this doesn't yet affect the T(x) constructor syntax, which will for the time being still perform any construction, coercion, or cast.
Swift SVN r4498
Now that we don't allow static methods to be invoked from instances we no longer need an AST node to represent an implicit instance-to-metatype conversion. MetatypeExpr encodes the explicit '.metatype' operation.
Swift SVN r4472
In the StmtChecker, consider a ConstructorDecl or DestructorDecl context to be a function context that returns (). In IRGen for constructors and destructors, set up proper return blocks so that 'return' does the right thing, and in constructors, pretend that the body has no return value even though the underlying constructor mechanism totally returns a value. Fixes <rdar://problem/12950817>.
Swift SVN r3915
In particular, fix a bug where DREs that refer to types were
always given trivial reps because we were trying to emit the
metatype's metatype. This in turn exposes a number of bugs,
including a typechecker bug (where GetMetatypeExpr bases
weren't converted to r-values) and a bug where MREs that
refer to types were always assumed to produce trivial reps.
Swift SVN r3095
We'll want a superclass pointer on ClassType and BoundGenericClassType,
and this also makes it easier to detect both kinds of class type.
Swift SVN r3061
conversions on metatypes; at runtime it has no effect,
since those conversions are always trivial. Fix a number
of bugs involving the conversion of metatypes, in both
typecheckers.
Swift SVN r3055
Introduce a '.metatype' form in the syntax and do some basic
type-checking that I probably haven't done right. Change
IR-generation for that and GetMetatypeExpr to use code that
actually honors the dynamic type of an expression.
Swift SVN r3053
since we're now applying solved constraints to an expression to
produce a well-typed expression. The resulting expressions are now
returned and run through the verifier, so deal with some of the
byref(implicit) fallout.
Swift SVN r2835
a reliable way to track whether a particular type has been
validated. Instead, add some bits to the type to indicate which stage
of checking it has received. I hate it, but it works and I don't know
of a better way to ensure that types get validated. This subsystem
will need to get rearchitected at some point (ugh).
Reduce the number of places where we build new BoundGenericTypes,
since they need to be validated fully to get substitutions, and then
introduces a number of validateTypeSimple() calls to validate types in
places where we know the validation will succeed, but we need that
information regardless.
Swift SVN r2681
parameters we're substituting. This is either "all levels" (when we're
substituting a specific base type in a member access) or "the
innermost level" (when we're substituting after deducing from a use or
application of a polymorphic function).
Swift SVN r2576
This is much more convenient for IRGen, and gives us a reasonable representation for a static
polymorphic function on a polymorphic type.
I had to hack up irgen::emitArrayInjectionCall a bit to make the rest of this patch work; John, please
revert those bits once emitCallee is fixed.
Swift SVN r2488
in SpecializeExpr, so that we have complete substitution and
protocol-conformance information. On the IR generation side, pass
witness tables for all of the archetypes (again, including derived
archetypes) into generic functions, so that we have witness tables for
all of the associated types.
There are at least two major issues:
(1) This is a terribly inefficient way to pass witness tables for
associated types. The witness tables for associated types should be
accessible via the witness tables of their parent. However, we need
more information in the ASTs here, because there may be additional
witness tables that will need to be passed for requirements that are
placed on the associated type by the generic function itself.
(2) Something about my test triggers a void/non-void verification failure
in the witness build for an instance function whose abstracted form
returns an associated type archetype and whose concrete form returns
an empty struct. See the FIXME in the test.
Swift SVN r2464
and derived) so they can be stored within the generic parameter list
for use 'later'.
More immediately, when we deduce arguments for a polymorphic function
type, check that all of the derived archetypes conform to all of the
protocol requirements, stashing that protocol-conformance information
in the coercion context (also for use 'later'). From a type-checking
perspective, we now actually verify requirements on associated types
such as the requirement on R.Element in, e.g.,
func minElement<R : Range requires R.Element : Ordered>(range : R)
-> R.Element
Swift SVN r2460
used in the very narrow case where we were converting from one
protocol type to another (super) protocol type. However, ErasureExpr
now handles this case via its null conformance entries (for the
"trivial" cases), and can cope with general existential types where
some conversions are trivial and others are not.
The IR generation side of this is basically just a hack to inline the
existing super-conversion code into the erasure code. This whole
routine will eventually need to be reworked anyway to deal with
destination types that are protocol-conformance types and with source
types that are archetypes (for generic/existential interactions).
Swift SVN r2213
type is either a protocol type or a protocol composition type. The
long form of this query returns the minimal set of protocol
declarations required by that existential type.
Use the new isExistentialType() everywhere that we previously checked
just for ProtocolType, implementing the appropriate rules. Among other
things, this includes:
- Type coercion
- Subtyping relationship
- Checking of explicit protocol conformance
- Member name lookup
Note the FIXME for IR generation; we need to decide how we want to
encode the witnesses for the different protocols.
This is most of <rdar://problem/11548207>.
Swift SVN r2086
application expressions that provide a 'this' parameter to a
method. There will eventually be more than just DotSyntaxCallExpr, to
capture the other syntactic (and implicit) forms.
Swift SVN r1924
applies to operators whose first parameter is [byref]. Assignments
must return Void, and have their first arguments implicitly treated as
an lvalue.
As part of this, add the various C compound operators (+=, -=, *=, /=,
&=, |=, and ^=) to the standard library.
Swift SVN r1846
in general, not sound. For the limited cases where we did use this
expression kind on lvalues (member access or instance method
invocations on a superprotocol), leave the conversion to the client of
their respective AST nodes (MemberRefExpr, DotSyntaxCallExpr). We may
decide to enrich these ASTs in the future with more information about
the conversion path, but it's not clear that it's actually useful
information for, e.g., IRgen.
Swift SVN r1830
[byref(implicit)], and rely on type coercion for the implicit object
argument to deal with the implicitness. This is one half of
<rdar://problem/11215969>.
The other half of <rdar://problem/11215969> requires us to invent some
syntax to allow increment/decrement/assignment to operate on lvalues
without requiring one to write '&'. There are two distinct ideas
gaining traction here:
- Adding an [assignment] attribute to these operators, which tells
us both that use of the operators is a statement (not an
expression) and that the byref argument (either on the left, or
the only argument).
- Allowing operators to be written as member functions, so that they
get the same treatment as "a.b".
The former seems like the better option.
Swift SVN r1819
protocol Document { var title : String }
protocol Versioning { func bumpVersion() }
protocol VersionedDocument : Document, Versioning { }
This commit covers the basic functionality of protocol inheritance, including:
- Parsing & AST representation
- Conforming to a protocol also requires conforming to its inherited
protocols
- Member lookup into a protocol also looks into its inherited
protocols (results are aggregated; there is no name hiding)
- Teach ErasureExpr to maintain lvalueness, so we don't end up
performing a silly load/erase/materialize dance when accessing
members from an inherited protocol.
Swift SVN r1804
e.g. "foo is \(i+j)". This implements rdar://11223686
Doug implemented all the hard parts of this. I ripped out support for nested string
literals (i.e. string literals within an interpolated string), which simplified the
approach and defined away some problems with his patch in progress. I plan a few refinements
on top of this basic patch.
Swift SVN r1738
be lvalues (materializing them if necessary), as we do with subscript
expressions. Introduce a verifier for member expressions to make sure
this property holds.
Note that there is a slight regression in semantic analysis for
assignments to properties, because we no longer detect some cases of
writing into a property that should not be set. The general solution
to the problem is covered by <rdar://problem/11259972>.
Swift SVN r1530
