This completes the FileUnit refactoring. A module consists of multiple
FileUnits, which provide decls from various file-like sources. I say
"file-like" because the Builtin module is implemented with a single
BuiltinUnit, and imported Clang modules are just a single FileUnit source
within a module.
Most modules, therefore, contain a single file unit; only the main module
will contain multiple source files (and eventually partial AST files).
The term "translation unit" has been scrubbed from the project. To refer
to the context of declarations outside of any other declarations, use
"top-level" or "module scope". To refer to a .swift file or its DeclContext,
use "source file". To refer to a single unit of compilation, use "module",
since the model is that an entire module will be compiled with a single
driver call. (It will still be possible to compile a single source file
through the direct-to-frontend interface, but only in the context of the
whole module.)
Swift SVN r10837
Part of the FileUnit restructuring. A serialized module is now represented as
a TranslationUnit containing a single SerializedASTFile.
As part of this change, the FileUnit interface has been made virtual, rather
than switching on the Kind in every accessor. We think the operations
performed on files are sufficiently high-level that this shouldn't affect us.
A nice side effect of all this is that we now properly model the visibility
of modules imported into source files. Previously, we would always consider
the top-level imports of all files within a target, whether re-exported or
not.
We may still end up wanting to distinguish properties of a complete Swift
module file from a partial AST file, but we can do that within
SerializedModuleLoader.
Swift SVN r10832
The goal of this series of commits is to allow the main module to consist
of both source files and AST files, where the AST files represent files
that were already built and don't need to be rebuilt, or of Swift source
files and imported Clang headers that share a module (because they are in
the same target).
Currently modules are divided into different kinds, and that defines how
decls are looked up, how imports are managed, etc. In order to achieve the
goal above, that polymorphism should be pushed down to the individual units
within a module, so that instead of TranslationUnit, BuiltinModule,
SerializedModule, and ClangModule, we have SourceFile, BuiltinUnit,
SerializedFile, and ClangUnit. (Better names welcome.) At that point we can
hopefully collapse TranslationUnit into Module and make Module non-polymorphic.
This commit makes SourceFile the subclass of an abstract FileUnit, and
makes TranslationUnit hold an array of FileUnits instead of SourceFiles.
To demonstrate that this is actually working, the Builtin module has also
been converted to FileUnit: it is now a TranslationUnit containing a single
BuiltinUnit.
Swift SVN r10830
Otherwise, we'll try to type-check bits of the main source file before we've
even looked at any of the supporting files.
This affects implicit multi-file mode, where "main.swift" is assumed to be
the main source file and all others are treated as library files. (See r9890.)
<rdar://problem/15526743>
Swift SVN r10795
Also remove the SourceLoc parameter from addNewSourceBuffer(). In llvm::SourceMgr
it is used to indicate textual inclusion, which we don't have in swift.
Swift SVN r10014
New rules for the driver (first match):
1. -repl: no input files allowed
2. -parse-sil: one input file allowed
3. -parse-as-library: any number of input files, all treated as Library
4. one input, extension is .sil: treated as SIL
5. one input: treated as Main
6. many inputs: treated as Library by default; "main.swift" is treated as Main
If we want more control here we can also add a -main-file option to explicitly
call out the main source file, but this at least unblocks building an entire
app target (like ListMaker) with a single Swift invocation.
Swift SVN r9890
Ideally this wouldn't be necessary, but the type substitution APIs required by generic specialization and SIL verification currently require a Module* pointer, and it's obnoxious to have to pass it down separately everywhere it's needed. Longer-term the reliance on Modules for type substitution might be able to go away.
Swift SVN r9866
There is still plenty of fallout to get everything fully correct, but
right now we can build the standard library and run all the tests in
multiple-file mode.
Swift SVN r9673
Anywhere that assumes a single input file per TU now has to do so explicitly.
Parsing still puts all files in a single SourceFile instance; that's next on
the list.
There are a lot of issues still to go, but the design is now in place.
Swift SVN r9669
This is useful in -i and REPL modes, which do not have a separate linking
step. This version of the -l flag doesn't rely on TranslationUnit. I also
cleaned up the library-loading diagnostics.
Swift SVN r9488
Being able to pass -l to the driver isn't so interesting, and it's an
extra field that lives on TranslationUnit for no reason. Just remove it.
This doesn't interfere with autolinking, i.e. inferring -l flags based on
imported modules.
Swift SVN r9241
docs/Resilience.rst describes the notion of a resilience component:
if the current source file is in the same component as a module being
used, it can use fragile access for everything in the other module,
with the assumption that everything in a component will always be
recompiled together.
However, nothing is actually using this today, and the interface we
have is probably not what we'll want in 2.0, when we actually implement
resilience.
Swift SVN r9174
Once we have multiple SourceFiles in a TranslationUnit, it no longer makes
sense to say "only SILGen decls starting from element N" without specifying
which source file you mean.
Also, clarify ownership by having performSILGeneration return a unique_ptr
instead of just a bare pointer.
Swift SVN r9112
Right now this is just an extra layer of indirection for the decls,
operators, and imports in a TU, but it's the first step towards compiling
multiple source files at once without pretending they're all in a single
file. This is important for the "implicit visibility" feature, where
declarations from other source files in the same module are accessible
from the file currently being compiled.
Swift SVN r9072
This reverts r8624 and compensates by passing the TU to the SILModule printer when needed.
This addresses concerns that Jordan and Sean had raised.
Swift SVN r8678
...unless the functions are declared [transparent], or if we're in an
immediate mode (in which case we won't get a separate chance to link
against the imported TUs).
This is an optimization that will matter more when we start dealing with
Xcode projects with many cross-file dependencies, especially if we have
some kind of implicit import of the other source files in the project.
In the future, we may want to parse more function bodies for the purpose
of inlining, not just the transparent ones, but we weren't taking
advantage of that now, so it's not a regression. (We're still not taking
advantage of it even for [transparent] functions.)
Swift SVN r7698
ClangImporter::create had a 'weak' attribute but it did not actually have the desired effect,
static libraries still want to link to ClangImporter::create if it is used.
Avoiding linking ClangImporter kinda "worked" because CompilerInvocation::setSDKPath was inline,
so if you didn't call it then you didn't need to link to Clang importer, but that is avoiding
ClangImporter statically, not dynamically.
You could see this by moving CompilerInvocation::setSDKPath out-of-line and then sil-opt would fail to link.
In order to have clients avoiding linking Clang, introduce NullClangImporter which just returns null for the
ClangImporter constructor function.
Swift SVN r7465
