Introduce two modes of bridging:
* inline mode: this is basically how it worked so far. Using full C++ interop which allows bridging functions to be inlined.
* pure mode: bridging functions are not inlined but compiled in a cpp file. This allows to reduce the C++ interop requirements to a minimum. No std/llvm/swift headers are imported.
This change requires a major refactoring of bridging sources. The implementation of bridging functions go to two separate files: SILBridgingImpl.h and OptimizerBridgingImpl.h.
Depending on the mode, those files are either included in the corresponding header files (inline mode), or included in the c++ file (pure mode).
The mode can be selected with the BRIDGING_MODE cmake variable. By default it is set to the inline mode (= existing behavior). The pure mode is only selected in certain configurations to work around C++ interop issues:
* In debug builds, to workaround a problem with LLDB's `po` command (rdar://115770255).
* On windows to workaround a build problem.
* split the PassUtils.swift file into PassContext.swift and Passes.swift
* rework `Builder` bridging allowing more insertion point variations, e.g. inserting at the end of a block.
* add Builder.create functions for more instructions
* add `PassContext.splitBlock`
* move SIL modification functions from PassContext to extensions of the relevant types (e.g. instructions).
* rename `Location.bridgedLocation` -> `Location.bridged`
