This commit compares the attributes on the decl inside the `@abi` attribute to those in the decl it’s attached to, diagnosing ABI-incompatible differences. It also rejects many attributes that don’t need to be specified in the `@abi` attribute, such as ObjC-ness, access control, or ABI-neutral traits like `@discardableResult`, so developers know to remove them.
* [CS] Decline to handle InlineArray in shrink
Previously we would try the contextual type `(<int>, <element>)`,
which is wrong. Given we want to eliminate shrink, let's just bail.
* [Sema] Sink `ValueMatchVisitor` into `applyUnboundGenericArguments`
Make sure it's called for sugar code paths too. Also let's just always
run it since it should be a pretty cheap check.
* [Sema] Diagnose passing integer to non-integer type parameter
This was previously missed, though would have been diagnosed later
as a requirement failure.
* [Parse] Split up `canParseType`
While here, address the FIXME in `canParseTypeSimpleOrComposition`
and only check to see if we can parse a type-simple, including
`each`, `some`, and `any` for better recovery.
* Introduce type sugar for InlineArray
Parse e.g `[3 x Int]` as type sugar for InlineArray. Gated behind
an experimental feature flag for now.
Introduce the experimental feature InferIsolatedConformances to align
with the upcoming feature proposed in SE-0470. This is a slight
generalization of the main-actor-specific inference that was already
in place for the default-main-actor mode from SE-0466. Note that, as
specified in SE-0470, InferIsolatedConformances is implied by the
default-main-actor mode.
Rework the type checker to support completely checking lifetime dependence
requirements. Don't let anything through without the feature being enabled and
complete annotation or inference.
First, prevent lifetime dependencies from sneaking into source that does not
enable LifetimeDependence. This is essential for controlling the scope of the
feature.
Fixing this is disruptive because, ever since `~Escapable` was introduced we
have been declaring empty non-Escapable types without enabling
LifetimeDependence. Such as:
struct Implicit_Init_Nonescapable : ~Escapable {}
Fixes: rdar://145979187 ([nonescapable] diagnose implicit non-Escapable
initializers as an error unless LifetimeDependence is enabled)
Various forms of unsupported 'inout' dependencies are now also caught by the
type checker.
Second, disable lifetime dependency inferrence except in unambiguous cases and
some implicitly generated cases.
Fixes: rdar://131176898 ([nonescapable] missing diagnostic for incorrectly inferred inherited dependence)
This is important to avoid source compatibility problems as inference rules
change. They will change as the proposal goes through review.
This fixes various latent missing dependency bugs.
Disable experimental lifetime dependence inference. Unambiguous lifetime
dependency candidates will still be inferred by default, without any frontend
options. Ambiguous candidates will, however, no longer be inferred unless
-Xfrontend -enable_experimental_lifetime_dependence_inference is enabled.
This all has to be done without breaking existing .swiftinterface files. So
backward compatibility logic is maintained.
Examples of inference rules that are no longer enabled by default:
1. do not infer a dependency on non-Escapable 'self' for methods with more than
zero parameters:
extension NE: ~Escapable {
/*@lifetime(self)*/ // ERROR: 'self' not inferred
func method<Arg>(arg: Arg) -> NE { ... }
}
2. Never infer a 'copy' dependency kind for explicit functions
extension NE: ~Escapable {
@lifetime(self) // ERROR: 'copy' not inferred
func method() -> NE { ... }
@lifetime(self) // ERROR: 'copy' not inferred
var property : NE { /*@lifetime(self: newValue)*/ set { ... } }
}
It is possible for a module interface (e.g., ModuleA) to be generated
with C++ interop disabled, and then rebuilt with C++ interop enabled
(e.g., because ModuleB, which imports ModuleA, has C++ interop enabled).
This circumstance can lead to various issues when name lookup behaves
differently depending on whether C++ interop is enabled, e.g., when
a module name is shadowed by a namespace of the same name---this only
happens in C++ because namespaces do not exist in C. Unfortunately,
naming namespaces the same as a module is a common C++ convention,
leading to many textual interfaces whose fully-qualified identifiers
(e.g., c_module.c_member) cannot be correctly resolved when C++ interop
is enabled (because c_module is shadowed by a namespace of the same
name).
This patch does two things. First, it introduces a new frontend flag,
-formal-cxx-interoperability-mode, which records the C++ interop mode
a module interface was originally compiled with. Doing so allows
subsequent consumers of that interface to interpret it according to the
formal C++ interop mode. Note that the actual "versioning" used by this
flag is very crude: "off" means disabled, and "swift-6" means enabled.
This is done to be compatible with C++ interop compat versioning scheme,
which seems to produce some invalid (but unused) version numbers. The
versioning scheme for both the formal and actual C++ interop modes
should be clarified and fixed in a subsequent patch.
The second thing this patch does is fix the module/namespace collision
issue in module interface files. It uses the formal C++ interop mode to
determine whether it should resolve C++-only decls during name lookup.
For now, the fix is very minimal and conservative: it only filters out
C++ namespaces during unqualified name lookup in an interface that was
originally generated without C++ interop. Doing so should fix the issue
while minimizing the chance for collateral breakge. More cases other
than C++ namespaces should be added in subsequent patches, with
sufficient testing and careful consideration.
rdar://144566922
Added an `-executor-factory` argument to the compiler to let you safely
specify the executors you wish to use (by naming a type that returns
them).
Also added some tests of the new functionality.
rdar://141348916
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/37774 added '-clang-target' which allows us to specify a target triple that only differs from '-target' by the OS version, when we want to provide a different OS version for API availability and type-checking, in order to set a common/unified target triple for the entire Clang module dependency graph, for presenting a unified API surface to the Swift client, serving as a maximum type-checking epoch.
This change adds an equivalent flag for the '-target-variant' configuration, as a mechanism to ensure that the entire module dependency graph presents a consistent os version.
Raw identifiers are backtick-delimited identifiers that can contain any
non-identifier character other than the backtick itself, CR, LF, or other
non-printable ASCII code units, and which are also not composed entirely
of operator characters.
We use experimental features to let people know that the construct is
subject to change and users should not rely on this unless they are
willing to rewrite the uses of this feature later. However, in compiler
generated code everything should be fair game, we will update the
compiler when these features change. This is a requirement to be able to
turn safe wrapper generation on by default.
We introduce a new macro called #SwiftSettings that can be used in conjunction
with a new stdlib type called SwiftSetting to control the default isolation at
the file level. It overrides the current default isolation whether it is the
current nonisolated state or main actor (when -enable-experimental-feature
UnspecifiedMeansMainActorIsolated is set).
ClangImporter can now import non-public members as of be73254cdc and 66c2e2c52b, but doing so triggers some latent ClangImporter bugs in projects that don't use or need those non-public members.
This patch introduces a new experimental feature flag, ImportNonPublicCxxMembers, that guards against the importation of non-public members while we iron out those latent issues. Adopters of the SWIFT_PRIVATE_FILEID feature introduced in bdf22948ce can enable this flag to opt into importing private members they wish to access from Swift.
rdar://145569473
With the acceptance of SE-0458, allow the use of unsafe expressions, the
@safe and @unsafe attributes, and the `unsafe` effect on the for..in loop
in all Swift code.
Introduce the `-strict-memory-safety` flag detailed in the proposal to
enable strict memory safety checking. This enables a new class of
feature, an optional feature (that is *not* upcoming or experimental),
and which can be detected via `hasFeature(StrictMemorySafety)`.
