The generality of the `AvailabilityContext` name made it seem like it
encapsulates more than it does. Really it just augments `VersionRange` with
additional set algebra operations that are useful for availability
computations. The `AvailabilityContext` name should be reserved for something
pulls together more than just a single version.
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
This change introduces a new compilation target platform to the Swift compiler - visionOS.
- Changes to the compiler build infrastrucuture to support building compiler-adjacent artifacts and test suites for the new target.
- Addition of the new platform kind definition.
- Support for the new platform in language constructs such as compile-time availability annotations or runtime OS version queries.
- Utilities to read out Darwin platform SDK info containing platform mapping data.
- Utilities to support re-mapping availability annotations from iOS to visionOS (e.g. 'updateIntroducedPlatformForFallback', 'updateDeprecatedPlatformForFallback', 'updateObsoletedPlatformForFallback').
- Additional tests exercising platform-specific availability handling and availability re-mapping fallback code-path.
- Changes to existing test suite to accomodate the new platform.
Call `swift_clearSensitive` after destroying or taking "sensitive" struct types.
Also, support calling C-functions with "sensitive" parameters or return values. In SIL, sensitive types are address-only and so are sensitive parameters/return values.
Though, (small) sensitive C-structs are passed directly to/from C-functions. We need re-abstract such parameter and return values for C-functions.
* Allow normal function results of @yield_once coroutines
* Address review comments
* Workaround LLVM coroutine codegen problem: it assumes that unwind path never returns.
This is not true to Swift coroutines as unwind path should end with error result.
This fixes an issue where the debug locations for Swift traps were dropped in the produced PDB files, as they were pointing to line 0
I validated this on a sample project using WinDbgx, which can now correctly trap on the same line in multiple places
This adds SIL-level support and LLVM codegen for normal results of a coroutine.
The main user of this will be autodiff as VJP of a coroutine must be a coroutine itself (in order to produce the yielded result) and return a pullback closure as a normal result.
For now only direct results are supported, but this seems to be enough for autodiff purposes.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
Deallocate dynamic allocas done for metadata/wtable packs. These
stackrestore calls are inserted on the dominance frontier and then stack
nesting is fixed up. That was achieved as follows:
Added a new IRGen pass PackMetadataMarkerInserter; it
- determines if there are any instructions which might allocate on-stack
pack metadata
- if there aren't, no changes are made
- if there are, alloc_pack_metadata just before instructions that could
allocate pack metadata on the stack and dealloc_pack_metadata on the
dominance frontier of those instructions
- fixup stack nesting
During IRGen, the allocations done for metadata/wtable packs are
recorded and IRGenSILFunction associates them with the instruction that
lowered. It must be the instruction after some alloc_pack_metadata
instruction. Then, when visiting the dealloc_pack_metadata instructions
corresponding to that alloc_pack_metadata, deallocate those packs.
In preparation for moving to llvm's opaque pointer representation
replace getPointerElementType and CreateCall/CreateLoad/Store uses that
dependent on the address operand's pointer element type.
This means an `Address` carries the element type and we use
`FunctionPointer` in more places or read the function type off the
`llvm::Function`.
On some Harvard architectures like WebAssembly that allow sliding code
and data address space offsets independently, it's impossible to make
direct relative reference to code from data because the relative offset
between them is not representable.
Use absolute function references instead of relative ones on such targets.
Generated code has never actually initialized this field, so we
might as well remove it. Doing so mostly doesn't impact the ABI
since we don't store anything for arguments or results in the
context as part of the normal call sequence. We do need to adjust
some of the hard-coded contexts, however, such as continuation
contexts and the statically-sized context for special runtime
async functions.
Add a new frontend option (called `-trap-function <name>`, similar to Clang’s existing `-ftrap-function`) that specifies a function to call instead of trapping.
When the option is used, the compiler will emit a call to the specified function every time it would have otherwise emitted a trap instruction. The function must have no parameters and it must never return.
rdar://89125883
The functions in llvm-project `AttributeList` have been
renamed/refactored to help remove uses of `AttributeList::*Index`.
Update to use these new functions where possible. There's one use of
`AttrIndex` remaining as `replaceAttributeTypeAtIndex` still takes the
index and there is no `param` equivalent. We could add one locally, but
presumably that will be added eventually.
Introduce a fake (but non-ABI) declaration to the swiftinterface
which marks that an SDK support swift_continuation_await, and then
only call it if that declaration exists, otherwise falling back
on the old atomic sequence. Using that sequence will badly mess
up the runtime's tracking of task state, but it might still work,
and more importantly things will still build, which solves the
short-term problem. Hopefully we can remove this hack soon.
Fixes rdar://problem/80787731.
Tracking this as a single bit is actually largely uninteresting
to the runtime. To handle priority escalation properly, we really
need to track this at a finer grain of detail: recording that the
task is running on a specific thread, enqueued on a specific actor,
or so on. But starting by tracking a single bit is important for
two reasons:
- First, it's more realistic about the performance overheads of
tasks: we're going to be doing this tracking eventually, and
the cost of that tracking will be dominated by the atomic
access, so doing that access now sets the baseline about right.
- Second, it ensures that we've actually got runtime involvement
in all the right places to do this tracking.
A propos of the latter: there was no runtime involvement with
awaiting a continuation, which is a point at which the task
potentially transitions from running to suspended. We must do
the tracking as part of this transition, rather than recognizing
in the run-loops that a task is still active and treating it as
having suspended, because the latter point potentially races with
the resumption of the task. To do this, I've had to introduce
a runtime function, swift_continuation_await, to do this awaiting
rather than inlining the atomic operation on the continuation.
As part of doing this work, I've also fixed a bug where we failed
to load-acquire in swift_task_escalate before walking the task
status records to invoke escalation actions.
I've also fixed several places where the handling of task statuses
may have accidentally allowed the task to revert to uncancelled.
This commit changes JobFlags storage to be 32bits, but leaves the runtime
API expressed in terms of size_t. This allows us to pack an Id in the
32bits we freed up.
The offset of this Id in the AsyncTask is an ABI constant. This way
introspection tools can extract the currently running task identifier
without any need for special APIs.
The immediate desire is to minimize the set of ABI dependencies
on the layout of an ExecutorRef. In addition to that, however,
I wanted to generally reduce the code size impact of an unsafe
continuation since it now requires accessing thread-local state,
and I wanted resumption to not have to create unnecessary type
metadata for the value type just to do the initialization.
Therefore, I've introduced a swift_continuation_init function
which handles the default initialization of a continuation
and returns a reference to the current task. I've also moved
the initialization of the normal continuation result into the
caller (out of the runtime), and I've moved the resumption-side
cmpxchg into the runtime (and prior to the task being enqueued).
Most of the async runtime functions have been changed to not
expect the task and executor to be passed in. When knowing the
task and executor is necessary, there are runtime functions
available to recover them.
The biggest change I had to make to a runtime function signature
was to swift_task_switch, which has been altered to expect to be
passed the context and resumption function instead of requiring
the caller to park the task. This has the pleasant consequence
of allowing the implementation to very quickly turn around when
it recognizes that the current executor is satisfactory. It does
mean that on arm64e we have to sign the continuation function
pointer as an argument and then potentially resign it when
assigning into the task's resume slot.
rdar://70546948
