- Add RuntimeTarget template This will allow for converting between
metadata structures for native host and remote target architectures.
- Create InProcess and External templates for stored pointers
Add a few more types to abstract pointer access in the runtime
structures but keep native in-process pointer access the same as that
with a plain old pointer type.
There is now a notion of a "stored pointer", which is just the raw value
of the pointer, and the actual pointer type, which is used for loads.
Decoupling these allows us to fork the behavior when looking at metadata
in an external process, but keep things the same for the in-process
case.
There are two basic "runtime targets" that you can use to work with
metadata:
InProcess: Defines the pointer to be trivially a T* and stored as a
uintptr_t. A Metadata * is exactly as it was before, but defined via
AbstractMetadata<InProcess>.
External: A template that requires a target to specify its pointer size.
ExternalPointer: An opaque pointer in another address space that can't
(and shouldn't) be indirected with operator* or operator->. The memory
reader will fetch the data explicitly.
This makes sure that runtime functions use proper calling conventions, get the required visibility, etc.
We annotate the most popular runtime functions in terms of how often they are invoked from Swift code.
- Almost all variants of retain/release functions are annotated to use the new calling convention.
- Some popular non-reference counting functions like swift_getGenericMetadata or swift_dynamicCast are annotated as well.
The set of runtime functions annotated to use the new calling convention should exactly match the definitions in RuntimeFunctions.def!
...and explicitly mark symbols we export, either for use by executables or for runtime-stdlib interaction. Until the stdlib supports resilience we have to allow programs to link to these SPI symbols.
This reverts commit r30215.
Fixes a bunch of problems on the ASAN bot.
Before:
Swift :: 1_stdlib/ErrorType.swift
Swift :: 1_stdlib/Runtime.swift
Swift :: Constraints/bridging.swift
Swift :: Constraints/diagnostics.swift
Swift :: Constraints/lvalues.swift
Swift :: DebugInfo/variables-repl.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/enum_runtime_alignment.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/nil_error_value.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/return_from_main.swift
Swift :: Misc/misc_diagnostics.swift
Swift :: Prototypes/Result.swift
Swift :: expr/expressions.swift
Swift-Unit :: runtime/SwiftRuntimeTests/MetadataTest.installCommonValueWitnesses_pod_indirect
After:
Swift :: Constraints/bridging.swift
Swift :: Constraints/diagnostics.swift
Swift :: Constraints/lvalues.swift
Swift :: Misc/misc_diagnostics.swift
Swift :: expr/expressions.swift
Swift-Unit :: runtime/SwiftRuntimeTests/MetadataTest.installCommonValueWitnesses_pod_indirect
Swift SVN r30396
Full type metadata isn't necessary to calculate the runtime layout of a dependent struct or enum; we only need the non-function data from the value witness table (size, alignment, extra inhabitant count, and POD/BT/etc. flags). This can be generated more efficiently than the type metadata for many types--if we know a specific instantiation is fixed-layout, we can regenerate the layout information, or if we know the type has the same layout as another well-known type, we can get the layout from a common value witness table. This breaks a deadlock in most (but not all) cases where a value type is recursive using classes or fixed-layout indirected structs like UnsafePointer. rdar://problem/19898165
This time, factor out the ObjC-dependent parts of the tests so they only run with ObjC interop.
Swift SVN r30266
Full type metadata isn't necessary to calculate the runtime layout of a dependent struct or enum; we only need the non-function data from the value witness table (size, alignment, extra inhabitant count, and POD/BT/etc. flags). This can be generated more efficiently than the type metadata for many types--if we know a specific instantiation is fixed-layout, we can regenerate the layout information, or if we know the type has the same layout as another well-known type, we can get the layout from a common value witness table. This breaks a deadlock in most (but not all) cases where a value type is recursive using classes or fixed-layout indirected structs like UnsafePointer. rdar://problem/19898165
Swift SVN r30243
This came up for multi-payload enums without generic parameters, eg
enum MyError {
case BusError
case TrainError(Int)
case DataLoss(String)
}
Fixes <rdar://problem/21739870>.
Swift SVN r30215
These will be used for reflection, and eventually to speed up generic
operations on single payload enums as well.
Progress on <rdar://problem/21739870>.
Swift SVN r30214
This change attempts to introduce the functionality without being too
disruptive. After we branch, I want to consolidate some of the runtime
functions and implement this functionality for multi-payload enums
as well, which requires adding new runtime metadata.
Example:
(swift) enum Color { case Red, Green, Blue(Int) }
(swift) print(Color.Red)
REPL.Color.Red
(swift) print(Color.Blue(5))
REPL.Color.Blue(5)
Implements <rdar://problem/18334936>.
Swift SVN r28430
