and refutable pattern bindings without an initializer.
- Enhance ASTDumper to dump where/else clauses on PBDs.
- Merge if/let conditional PBD logic into the mainline logic now that they are all
potentially conditional (more simplifications coming for this)
add tests for the fixits, which exercise the earlier SourceRange enhancments, e.g.:
x.swift:3:5: error: refutable pattern match can fail; add an else {} to handle this condition
let o? = a
^~
else {}
Swift SVN r26751
to find variables, enabling it to work with refutable patterns in
addition to nonrefutable ones. This allows eliminating some special
case code in the parser, NFC.
Swift SVN r26686
This patch also introduces some SILGen infrastructure for
dividing the function into "ordinary" and "postmatter"
sections, with error-handling-like stuff going into the
final section. Currently, this is largely undermined by
SILBuilder, but I'm going to fix that in a follow-up.
Swift SVN r26422
- Strength reduce isAtStartOfBindingName() to just check for
identifier or _ and inline into its two callers.
- Rename Token::isIdentifierOrNone to isIdentifierOrUnderscore.
- Teach InVarOrLetPattern about matching patterns, so that the
parser knows when it is parsing an expression as a matching
pattern but is not yet inside a let/var pattern.
- Use newfound knowledge of matching patterns to refine handling
of unexpected let/var when parsing an expression, but not in a
pattern context, slightly improving QoI in invalid cases.
Swift SVN r26172
This is still a subject of discussion on swift-dev, but it seems like clearly the right
way to go to me. If it turns out that this isn't a good direction, I'll revert this and
subsequent patches built on top of it.
Swift SVN r26168
This was because the ambiguity between c-style and foreach loops wasn't being
properly handled. Use the canParsePattern() logic to handle this in full
generality.
Since that logic was unused, dust it off and clean it up a bit. Similarly,
remove some old vestigates of default argument parsing in tuples and
old-syntax array handling.
Swift SVN r26164
duplicated by the InVarOrLetPattern state in the Parser object. Beef
InVarOrLetPattern up so that we can remove it.
NFC except that we now reject pointless let patterns in foreach loops,
similar to how we reject var patterns inside of let patterns.
Swift SVN r26163
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.
Where before you might have written:
if let x = foo() {
you now need to write:
if let x? = foo() {
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.
To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?. It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.
For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error. This means that you'll get:
t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
^
?
I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time. I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.
In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).
Swift SVN r26150
conjunction with .fixItInsert(). As such, introduce a helper named
.fixItInsertAfter() that does what we all want. Adopt this in various
places around the compiler. NFC.
Swift SVN r26147
For now, we assume that 'while' after the braces starts
a do/while rather than being an independent statement.
We should disambiguate this, or better, remove do/while.
Tests later.
Swift SVN r26079
Corrected several places where compiler generated AST nodes were not properly
marked as implicit.
For interpolated strings also fixed string segment locations and made sure
the first and last segments are preserved in AST even if they are empty.
Swift SVN r25983
auto-completing @attributes. By delaying the handling of code completion token after the entire decl being parsed, we know
what are the targets of the attribute to finishe, thus, only suggesting those applicable attributes.
Swift SVN r25938
If '{' is encountered immediately after 'if', assume that the condition
is missing. Apply the same treatment to while, do-while, for-in, and
switch. This way we're not trying to re-parse, backtrack, repurpose
misparsed closure bodies, etc. in those cases. Users who want to write a
condition that starts with '{' can wrap it in parens.
Addressing feedback re <rdar://problem/18940198>.
Swift SVN r25747
Otherwise we'll get all the way to IRGen and then try to emit them. And try
to reference them in serialization.
rdar://problem/19935034
Swift SVN r25567
This doesn't allow 'continue' out of an if statement for the same reason we don't
allow it on switch: we'd prefer people to write loops more explicitly.
Swift SVN r25565
un-type-annotated AnyObject binding in "if let", and allows general
patterns in if-let.
This also reverts some unrelated QoI improvements that went in with those
patches, but I'll add those back next.
Swift SVN r25507
closure, reparse it as a brace statement instead of attempting to
repurpose the closure body. Suppress diagnostics from the initial
condition parse until we're committed to that parse.
<rdar://problem/18940198> Fuzzing Swift: performTypeChecking(...) crashes in ContextualizeClosures::walkToExprPre(...): Assertion failed: "Incorrect parent decl context for closure"
Swift SVN r25438
two logically independent but related patches conflated together:
- Improve error recovery for malformed if/let conditions, particularly
when the user uses "," instead of &&. Add testcases for error recovery
requested by Jordan.
- Add a syntactic requirement that the pattern of an if/let condition be
a simple identifier or _. We allow slightly broader patterns here now,
but they will change in the future when refutable patterns are allowed.
It is best to be narrow and then open it up later so we can do a great
job of QoI then.
This includes the changes to the stdlib directory that I forgot to commit
with the patch the previous time.
Swift SVN r25408
- Improve error recovery for malformed if/let conditions, particularly
when the user uses "," instead of &&. Add testcases for error recovery
requested by Jordan.
- Add a syntactic requirement that the pattern of an if/let condition be
a simple identifier or _. We allow slightly broader patterns here now,
but they will change in the future when refutable patterns are allowed.
It is best to be narrow and then open it up later so we can do a great
job of QoI then.
Swift SVN r25371
Brace statement created for wrapping IfConfig inside TopLevelCodeDecl does not have
closing brace, so we should use the previous token’s location as right brace location.
Swift SVN r24797
if-let statements (also while and var, of course) that include multiple bindings
and where clauses.
SILGen support still remains, it currently just asserts on the new constructs.
Swift SVN r24239
initializer but has no "parent" PatternBindingDecl or Pattern (i.e.
paramdecls). This is currently set on decls in the pattern of
foreach loops and case patterns, but I'll add it to other places I
find as well.
NFC since this bit is only set and not read, just more yak shaving.
Swift SVN r23910
SILMetadata is the base class with a single enum member (MDKind).
SILBranchNode is the derived class with additional members:
unsigned NumOperands
an array of uint32_t
A static member function SILBranchNode::get is implemented to get or create
SILBranchNode. All SILMetadata created are uniqued and saved in SILModule's
member variable:
llvm::FoldingSet<SILMetadata> Metadatas
Usage of SILMetadta by SILInstruction is captured in SILModule's member variable:
llvm::DenseMap<const SILInstruction *, SILMetadata *> MetadataStore
This is similar to LLVM's Metadata. Another option is to add a SILMetadata* to
SILInstruction. The disadvantage is the waste of space when we don't have PGO on.
This commit also enables parsing and printing of SILMetadata.
We add keyword sil_metadata to define SILMetadata:
sil_metadata !0 = {"branch_weights", 3, 5}
For parsing, we add a map in SILModule
llvm::DenseMap<unsigned, SILMetadata *> NumberedMetadata
that maps from ID to SILMetadata* to help matching usage of "!id" in SILFunction
with definition of "!id" in sil_metadata section.
For printing, we assign IDs to SILMetadata at SILModule scope, we then pass in
an optional argument of
llvm::DenseMap<const SILMetadata *, unsigned> *MetadataMap
to SILFunction::print in order to get the ID of SILMetadata used in
SILInstruction.
Post-commit review will be appreciated.
rdar://18269754
Swift SVN r23713
When BraceStmt is generated to represent missing {...} block it should be marked as
implicit and be associated with the owning statement.
Swift SVN r23531
This already can't happen in most circumstances because of trailing closures, but we didn't explicitly disallow it at the beginning of a BraceStmt or following a statement production. Fixes the parser part of rdar://problem/17850752 (though there's a type checker bug there too).
Swift SVN r21663
