- Respond to Doug's code review feedback
- Stop hacking around with scopes and use "emplace" to work around RAII in the inactive config case
- Limit use of StringRef on the front-end, in favor of std::string
- Use ArrayRef rather than SmallVector within IfConfigDecl
- Reorder new property declarations on BraceStmt to prevent unnecessary alignment issues
- Update ParseBraceItems to better capture top-level declarations, rather than using token lookahead
Swift SVN r14306
These changes add support for build and target configurations in the compiler.
Build and target configurations, combined with the use of #if/#else/#endif allow
for conditional compilation within declaration and statement contexts.
Build configurations can be passed into the compiler via the new '-D' flag, or
set within the LangOptions class. Target configurations are implicit, and
currently only "os" and "arch" are supported.
Swift SVN r14305
We can attach comments to declarations. Right now we only support comments
that precede the declarations (trailing comments will be supported later).
The implementation approach is different from one we have in Clang. In Swift
the Lexer attaches the comments to the next token, and parser checks if
comments are present on the first token of the declaration. This is much
cleaner, and faster than Clang's approach (where we perform a binary search on
source locations and do ad-hoc fixups afterwards).
The comment <-> decl correspondence is modeled as "virtual" attributes that can
not be spelled in the source. These attributes are not serialized at the
moment -- this will be implemented later.
Swift SVN r14031
outside of debugger-support mode. Rip out the existing special-case
code when parsing expr-identifier.
This means that the Lexer needs a LangOptions. Doug and I
talked about just adding that as a field of SourceMgr, but
decided that it was worth it to preserve the possibility of
parsing different dialects in different source files.
By design, the lexer doesn't tokenize fundamentally differently
in different language modes; it might decide something is invalid,
or it might (eventually) use a different token kind for the
same consumed text, but we don't want it deciding to consume more or
less of the stream per token.
Note that SIL mode does make that kind of difference, and that
arguably means that various APIs for tokenizing need to take a
"is SIL mode" flag, but we're getting away with it because we
just don't really care about fidelity of SIL source files.
rdar://14899000
Swift SVN r13896
Thanks to the way we've set up our diagnostics engine, there's not actually
a reason for /everything/ to get rebuilt when /one/ diagnostic changes.
I've split them up into five categories for now: Parse, Sema, SIL, IRGen,
and Frontend, plus a set of "Common" diagnostics that are used in multiple
areas of the compiler. We can massage this later.
No functionality change, but should speed up compile times!
Swift SVN r12438
As with the monadic '?', we treat any left-bound '!' as a postfix
operator. Currently, it extracts the value of its optional
subexpression, failing at run-time if the optional is empty.
Swift SVN r8948
For most operators, an expression like "a@b" is lexed with '@' as a binary
operation on 'a' and 'b'. However, we want to make sure we can support
calling optional functions using the syntax "a!()". Consequently, if there
are no spaces around a single '!' token, it is treated as a postfix operator
instead of an infix operator. The infix interpretation can still be requested
by using spaces on both sides of the operator.
Swift SVN r7651
...but make sure plain "@.y" still parses as a prefix op.
This allows our planned postfix ! operator for Optional types to parse
correctly when a member is accessed. There's probably still QoI work here:
the following member may have been intended to be a free member as in
"x @ .y", where '@' is a binary operator.
Swift SVN r7513
integration
Motivation: libIDE clients should be simple, and they should not have to
translate token-based SourceRanges to character locations.
This also allows us to remove the dependency of DiagnosticConsumer on the
Lexer. Now the DiagnosticEngine translates the diagnostics to CharSourceRanges
and passes character-based ranges to the DiagnosticConsumer.
Swift SVN r7173
Every valid source location corresponds to a source buffer. There should be no
cases where we create a source location for a random string. Thus,
findBufferContainingLoc() always succeeds.
Swift SVN r7120
Lexer::BufferID is the single point of truth, Lexer::BufferStart and
Lexer::BufferEnd is just a cache -- they always point to the beginning and end
of the buffer, even in a sublexer.
Swift SVN r7079
Now we have a clear separation between a primary lexer, which scans the whole
buffer, and a sublexer, which can be created from a primary lexer to scan a
part of the buffer.
Swift SVN r7077
Decouple splitting an interpolated string to segments, from encoding the string segments.
This allows us to tokenize or re-lex a string literal without having to allocate memory for
encoding the string segments when we don't need them encoded.
Swift SVN r6940
-Parse the expression using a begin/end state sub-Lexer instead of a general StringRef Lexer
-Introduce a Lexer constructor accepting a BufferID and a range inside the buffer, and use it for swift::tokenize.
Swift SVN r6938
