- deduplicate the logic to compute the resource folder
- install headers and module files in shared and static resource folders
- forward -static flag when calling swiftc with -print-target-info
Print implementation-only imports in the private textual interface
only if also importing SPI. This allows to export types from
implementation-only imports in SPI and brings the private textual
interfaces in line with the binary interfaces.
This is a temporary solution as we need to better design the language
feature around this.
This feature requires passing -experimental-spi-imports to the frontend
that generates the private swiftinterface file.
Add `async` to the type system. `async` can be written as part of a
function type or function declaration, following the parameter list, e.g.,
func doSomeWork() async { ... }
`async` functions are distinct from non-`async` functions and there
are no conversions amongst them. At present, `async` functions do not
*do* anything, but this commit fully supports them as a distinct kind
of function throughout:
* Parsing of `async`
* AST representation of `async` in declarations and types
* Syntactic type representation of `async`
* (De-/re-)mangling of function types involving 'async'
* Runtime type representation and reconstruction of function types
involving `async`.
* Dynamic casting restrictions for `async` function types
* (De-)serialization of `async` function types
* Disabling overriding, witness matching, and conversions with
differing `async`
Introsuce a new "forward" algorithm for trailing closures where
the unlabeled trailing closure argument matches the next parameter in
the parameter list that can accept an unlabeled trailing closure.
The "can accept an unlabeled trailing closure" criteria looks at the
parameter itself. The parameter accepts an unlabeled trailing closure
if all of the following are true:
* The parameter is not 'inout'
* The adjusted type of the parameter (defined below) is a function type
The adjusted type of the parameter is the parameter's type as
declared, after performing two adjustments:
* If the parameter is an @autoclosure, use the result type of the
parameter's declared (function) type, before performing the second
adjustment.
* Remove all outer "optional" types.
For example, the following function illustrates both adjustments to
determine that the parameter "body" accepts an unlabeled trailing
closure:
func doSomething(body: @autoclosure () -> (((Int) -> String)?))
This is a source-breaking change. However, there is a "fuzzy" matching
rule that that addresses the source break we've observed in practice,
where a defaulted closure parameter precedes a non-defaulted closure
parameter:
func doSomethingElse(
onError: ((Error) -> Void)? = nil,
onCompletion: (Int) -> Void
) { }
doSomethingElse { x in
print(x)
}
With the existing "backward" scan rule, the trailing closure matches
onCompletion, and onError is given the default of "nil". With the
forward scanning rule, the trailing closure matches onError, and there
is no "onCompletion" argument, so the call fails.
The fuzzy matching rule proceeds as follows:
* if the call has a single, unlabeled trailing closure argument, and
* the parameter that would match the unlabeled trailing closure
argument has a default, and
* there are parameters *after* that parameter that require an argument
(i.e., they are not variadic and do not have a default argument)
then the forward scan skips this parameter and considers the next
parameter that could accept the unlabeled trailing closure.
Note that APIs like doSomethingElse(onError:onCompletion:) above
should probably be reworked to put the defaulted parameters at the
end, which works better with the forward scan and with multiple
trailing closures:
func doSomethingElseBetter(
onCompletion: (Int) -> Void,
onError: ((Error) -> Void)? = nil
) { }
doSomethingElseBetter { x in
print(x)
}
doSomethingElseBetter { x in
print(x)
} onError: { error in
throw error
}
Introduce a new frontend flag -enable-volatile-modules to trigger
loading swiftmodule files as volatile and avoid using mmap. Revert the
default behavior to using mmap.
-compile-module-from-interface action now takes arguments of -candidate-module-file.
If one of the candidate module files is up-to-date, the action emits a forwarding
module pointing to the candidate module instead of building a binary module.
To support multiple versions of SDKs of the same platform, we should move prebuilt
module cache into an SDK-versioned sub-directory and teach the compiler to look into
the directory if present.
rdar://65488510
Its use in deserialization can be replaced with a
more general check for whether we're deserializing
into the same module. Its use in the SILVerifier
is subsumed by the check for whether the SILModule
is canonical, which it isn't during merge-modules.
This commit adds -lto flag for frontend to enable LTO at LLVM level.
When -lto=llvm given, compiler emits LLVM bitcode file instead of object
file and adds index summary for LTO.
In addition for ELF format, emit llvm.dependent-libraries section to
embed auto linking information
This reverts commit 621b3b4223.
The driver is double faulting on my Linux box (Fedora 32 / x86-64). It
crashes due to heap corruption, then hangs trying to introspect and
print the stack. There also appears to be an unrelated(?) uninitialized
memory error that valgrind detects (as opposed to malloc's own self
diagnostics).
Instead of taking paths of Swift module files from front-end command line
arguments, we should take a JSON file specifying details of explicit modules.
The advantages is (1) .swiftdoc and .swiftsourceinfo can be associated
with a .swiftmodule file, and (2) module names are explicitly used as
keys in the JSON input so we don't need to eagerly deserialize a .swiftmodule
file to collect the module name.
Previously the path to covered files in the __LLVM_COV / __llvm_covmap
section were absolute. This made remote builds with coverage information
difficult because all machines would have to have the same build root.
This change uses the values for `-coverage-prefix-map` to remap files in
the coverage info to relative paths. These paths work correctly with
llvm-cov when it is run from the same source directory as the
compilation, or from a different directory using the `-path-equivalence`
argument.
This is analogous to this change in clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D81122
-enable-experimental-private-intransitive-dependencies -> -enable-direct-intramodule-dependencies
-disable-experimental-private-intransitive-dependencies -> -disable-direct-intramodule-dependencies
While we're here, rename DependencyCollector::Mode's constants and clean
up the documentation.
