Track the original-decl/captured decl as part of the symbol passed to the IndexConsumer. This allows the Rename consumer to check if the symbol is a shadowed reference to a decl being renamed, without the index skipping the other relevant output when visiting shadowing variables.
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/76805
The "buffer ID" in a SourceFile, which is used to find the source file's
contents in the SourceManager, has always been optional. However, the
effectively every SourceFile actually does have a buffer ID, and the
vast majority of accesses to this information dereference the optional
without checking.
Update the handful of call sites that provided `nullopt` as the buffer
ID to provide a proper buffer instead. These were mostly unit tests
and testing programs, with a few places that passed a never-empty
optional through to the SourceFile constructor.
Then, remove optionality from the representation and accessors. It is
now the case that every SourceFile has a buffer ID, simplying a bunch
of code.
We treated enum case parameters the same way as function parameters and weren’t considering that they can be unlabeled. That caused us to insert eg. `_ ` in front of the case’s type, producing `case myCase(_ String)`, which is invalid. When we are inside an enum case parameter and the parameter label is empty, treat it the same as a function call, which will leave the label untouched if it isn’t modified and insert a label including a colon if a new label is introduced.
https://github.com/apple/sourcekit-lsp/issues/1228
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
For example, the following declarations have the same USR with a single ERROR_TYPE parameter despite being distinct declarations.
```swift
func bar(body: Invalid) {}
func bar(ignoreCase: Bool, body: Invalid) {}
```
We originally intended to check the USR so that local rename behaves more like global rename, which also looks symbols up by USR. But the above example proves that assumption wrong.
rdar://126803702
When there are problems in the properties in the target type, witness
methods may not be synthesized. Don't try to add such methods.
https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/72387
LLVM is presumably moving towards `std::string_view` -
`StringRef::startswith` is deprecated on tip. `SmallString::startswith`
was just renamed there (maybe with some small deprecation inbetween, but
if so, we've missed it).
The `SmallString::startswith` references were moved to
`.str().starts_with()`, rather than adding the `starts_with` on
`stable/20230725` as we only had a few of them. Open to switching that
over if anyone feels strongly though.
* Support extensions including conditional conformance
* Correct access modifiers
* More correct lookup for the synthesized declarations
* Avoid printing decls in nested types (rdar://98025945)
Test shadowed variable of same type
Fully type check caller side macro expansion
Skip macro default arg caller side expr at decl primary
Test macro expand more complex expressions
Set synthesized expression as implicit
Add test case for with argument, not compiling currently
Test with swiftinterface
Always use the string representation of the default argument
Now works across module boundary
Check works for multiple files
Make default argument expression work in single file
Use expected-error
Disallow expression macro as default argument
Using as a sub expression in default argument still allowed as expression macros behave the same as built-in magic literals
The old TypeAttributes reprsentation wasn't too bad for a small number of
simple attributes. Unfortunately, the number of attributes has grown over
the years by quite a bit, which makes TypeAttributes fairly bulky even at
just a single SourceLoc per attribute. The bigger problem is that we want
to carry more information than that on some of these attributes, which is
all super ad hoc and awkward. And given that we want to do some things
for each attribute we see, like diagnosing unapplied attributes, the linear
data structure does require a fair amount of extra work.
I switched around the checking logic quite a bit in order to try to fit in
with the new representation better. The most significant change here is the
change to how we handle implicit noescape, where now we're passing the
escaping attribute's presence down in the context instead of resetting the
context anytime we see any attributes at all. This should be cleaner overall.
The source range changes around some of the @escaping checking is really a
sort of bugfix --- the existing code was really jumping from the @ sign
all the way past the autoclosure keyword in a way that I'm not sure always
works and is definitely a little unintentional-feeling.
I tried to make the parser logic more consistent around recognizing these
parameter specifiers; it seems better now, at least.
It's not clear that its worth keeping this as a
base class for SerializedAbstractClosure and
SerializedTopLevelCodeDecl, most clients are
interested in the concrete kinds, not only whether
the context is serialized.
The `NameMatcher` implemented in swift-syntax as slightly different semantics because it consideres `(callable.|callAsFunction)(x: 78)` as a reference to `callAsFunction` instead of a call with argument labels `(x: 78)`, which means that one test needs to be updated.
Refactor `addSyntacticRenameRanges`, adding comments to make it easier to follow and remove its dependency on the `IsFunctionLike` parameter in `RenameLoc`.
https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/70174 change swift-refactor and sourcekitd to not use `NameMatcher` from swift-syntax but it did not remove the link dependency from swiftRefactoring on `swiftIDEUtilsBridging` if `SWIFT_BUILD_SWIFT_SYNTAX` is false. Do so now.
This allows building sourcekitd and swift-refactor with `SWIFT_BUILD_SWIFT_SYNTAX=NO`. In these builds, the `relatedidents` and `find-syntactic-rename-ranges` requests will always return an error.
Function body macros allow one to introduce a function body for a
particular function, either providing a body for a function that
doesn't have one, or wholesale replacing the body of a function that
was written with a new one.
With the local refactoring being removed, all production refactoring paths return a set of ranges to rename and don’t apply edits to the file. Thus, the `syntactic-rename` action also doesn’t make sense anymore.
