For associated types inferred to be Any, we were allowing the type to
satisfy more specific same-type constraints, e.g. Element ==
Character (where Element is the associated type). This is clearly wrong.
The fix here is very specific to empty protocol compositions, and
removes some code in matchTypes() that doesn't make a lot of
sense. Looking back at the history, this was added in a commit that made
a handful of other changes, and it's not clear this particular change
was important for the issues that commit claimed to fix (and in fact
removing this regresses no tests).
Fixes rdar://problem/27515965.
Extend the handling of function reference kinds to member references
(e.g., x.f), and therefore the logic for stripping argument labels. We
appear to be stripping argument labels from all of the places where it
is required.
When referencing a function in the type checker, drop argument labels
when we don't need them to type-check an immediate call to that
function. This provides the semantic behavior of SE-0111, e.g.,
references to functions as values produce unlabeled function types,
without the representational change of actually dropping argument
labels from the type system.
At the moment, this only works for bare references to functions. It
still needs to be pushed through more of the type checker and more AST
nodes to work in the general case.
Keep this work behind the frontend flag
-suppress-argument-labels-in-types for now.
Factor out the trailing storage of call arguments, since we'll need it
for a few different kinds of expression nodes. Use it for both
CallExpr (which already had this storage, albeit with a specialized
implementation) and now SubscriptExpr.
Yet another step on the way to SE-0111, capture the argument labels
(and their locations) directly in CallExpr, rather than depending on
them being part of the tuple argument.
When we are type-checking calls, subscripts, or other call-like
expressions, use the argument labels provided by the various
expression nodes rather than those encoded in the tuple type. This
means that argument label matching now matches the callee
declaration's argument labels against the argument labels, without
relying on encoding the argument labels within types in the AST.
This refactor is a stepping stone torward SE-0111.
This reverts commit 6542100d62. SE-0116
expands Objective-C `id` to Swift `Any`, moving the conversion into the
bridging mechanism rather than the type system.
* [Type System] Handle raw pointer conversion.
As proposed in SE-0107: UnsafeRawPointer.
https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0107-unsaferawpointer.md#implicit-argument-conversion
UnsafeMutablePointer<T> -> UnsafeMutableRawPointer
UnsafeMutablePointer<T> -> UnsafeRawPointer
UnsafePointer<T> -> UnsafeRawPointer
UnsafeMutableRawPointer -> UnsafeRawPointer
inout:
&anyVar -> UnsafeMutableRawPointer
&anyVar -> UnsafeRawPointer
array -> UnsafeRawPointer
string -> UnsafeRawPointer
varArray -> UnsafeMutableRawPointer
* Rename expectEqual(_, _, sameValue:) to expectEqualTest to workaround a type system bug.
<rdar://26058520> Generic type constraints incorrectly applied to functions with the same name
This is exposed by additions to the type system for UnsafeRawPointer.
Warning: unit tests fail very confusingly without this fix.
If something isn't a class or bridgeable by value or error bridging, we can still fall back to universal bridging by the runtime. Make this available for manual use by an explicit `as AnyObject` cast.
This is the hack that has been used to reject things like:
var i: Int = ...
if i == nil { }
in the past.
The hack is inconsistent with normal treatment of mixed optional &
non-optional operands, and will be replaced with a warning instead of
treating it as a failure to type check.
There is still a case that we still fail type checking on -
Unsafe*Pointer<> compares to nil. That will be addressed by a separate
commit.
The new warning will be addressed by rdar://problem/27457457. When the
new warnings are updated the test cases modified here will again need to
be updated based on the text of the new warning.
This is needed for declaration-based resolution subscript expressions,
which is the basis for implementing default arguments in subscripts as
well as declaration-based argument labels.
This reverts commit dc24c2bd34.
Turns out Chris fixed the build but when I was looking at the bots, his fix had
not been tested yet, so I thought the tree was still red and was trying to
revert to green.
This removes conformance of DarwinBool and ObjCBool to the Boolean protocol,
and makes the &&/||/! operators be concrete w.r.t. Bool instead of abstract
on Boolean.
This fixes some outstanding bugs w.r.t diagnostics, but exposes some cases
where an existing diagnostic is not great. I'll fix that in a later patch
(tracked by rdar://27391581).
change includes both the necessary protocol updates and the deprecation
warnings
suitable for migration. A future patch will remove the renamings and
make this
a hard error.
Introduce bridging of NSError to ErrorProtocol, so an Objective-C API
expressed via an "NSError *" will be imported using ErrorProtocol in
the Swift. For example, the Objective-C method:
- (void)handleError:(NSError *)error userInteractionPermitted:(BOOL)userInteractionPermitted;
will now be imported as:
func handleError(_ error: ErrorProtocol, userInteractionPermitted: Bool)
This is bullet (3) under the proposed solution of SE-0112. Note that
we made one semantic change here: instead of removing the conformance
of NSError to ErrorProtocol, which caused numerous problems both
theoretical and actual because the model expects that an NSError
conforms to ErrorProtocol without requiring wrapping, we instead limit
the ErrorProtocol -> NSError conversion that would be implied by
bridging. This is defensible in the short term because it also
eliminates the implicit conversion, and aligns with SE-0072, which
eliminates implicit bridging conversions altogether.
This adds a narrow special case in code-completion for control-flow-like
methods such as DispatchQueue().sync that are () -> (), to add a new
completion where the trailing closure is immediately expanded rather
than having to invoke placeholder expansion as a second step.
rdar://problem/26628804
Rather than using a specialized matching rule in the type checker that
depends on having default arguments in types, use call argument
matching consistently.
Note #1: This (correctly) breaks some existing code that depends on
inferring a parameter type of () for a single-argument parameter from
a no-argument function type().
Note #2: This pessimizes a code completion test, where the code
completion engine seems to depend on some quirks of argument
matching. The "type relationship" matching needs non-trivial work.
This flag tracks whether we have a special kind of imported class
that has limitations in what you can do with it. Currently it's
used for two things: CF classes, and the magic "Protocol" class used
to represent Objective-C protocol metadata. I'm planning to add a
third to handle classes with the recently-added objc_runtime_visible
attribute, which describes an Objective-C class whose runtime symbols
are hidden (forcibly preventing categories and subclassing). This is
used for some of the types in Dispatch, which has exposed some of the
classes that were considered implementation details on past OSs.
I'm splitting the flag into an enum rather than just marking the
Dispatch classes with the existing flag because we still need to
be able to /cast/ to the Dispatch types (which you can't do with CF
types today) and because they deserve better than to be lumped in
with CF for diagnostic purposes.
Groundwork for rdar://problem/26850367, which is that Swift will
happily let you extend the new Dispatch classes but then fails to find
the symbols at link-time.
Rather than relying on the embedding of default argument information
into tuple types (which is gross), make sure that the various clients
(type checker, type checker diagnostics, constraint application) can
dig out the callee declaration and retrieve that information from
there.
Whenever we have a call, retrieve the argument labels from the
argument structurally and associate them with the callee. We were
previously doing this as a separate AST walk (which was unnecessary),
so fold that into constraint generation for a CallExpr.
This is a slightly-pared-back version of
3753d779bc that isn't so rigid in its
interpretation of ASTs. I'll tighten up the semantics over time.
Whenever we have a call, retrieve the argument labels from the
argument structurally and associate them with the callee. We were
previously doing this as a separate AST walk (which was unnecessary),
so fold that into constraint generation for a CallExpr. We were also
allowing weird ASTs to effectively disable this information: tighten
that up and require that CallExprs always have a ParenExpr, TupleExpr,
or (as a temporary hack) a TypeExpr whose representation is a
TupleTypeRepr as their argument prior to type checking. This gives us
a more sane AST to work with, and guarantees that we aren't losing
label information.
From the user perspective, this should be NFC, because it's mostly AST
cleanup and staging.
Implements the core functionality of SE-0064 / SR-1239, which
introduces support for accessing the Objective-C selectors of the
getter and setter of an @objc property via #selector(getter:
propertyName) and #selector(setter: propertyName).
Introduce a bunch of QoI around mistakes using #selector to refer to a
property without the "getter:" or "setter:", using Fix-Its to help the
user get it right. There is more to do in this area, still, but we
have an end-to-end feature working.
Much of the implementation and nearly all of the test cases are from
Alex Hoppen (@ahoppen). I've done a bit of refactoring, simplified the
AST representation, and replaced Alex's custom
expression-to-declaration logic with an extension to the constraint
solver. The last bit might be short-lived, based on swift-evolution
PR280, which narrows the syntax of #selector considerably.
