We remove the existing `swift_reflection_iterateAsyncTaskAllocations` API that attempts to provide all necessary information about a tasks's allocations starting from the task. Instead, we split it into two pieces: `swift_reflection_asyncTaskSlabPointer` to get the first slab for a task, and `+swift_reflection_asyncTaskSlabAllocations` to get the allocations in a slab, and a pointer to the next slab.
We also add a dummy metadata pointer to the beginning of each slab. This allows tools to identify slab allocations on the heap without needing to locate every single async task object. They can then use `swift_reflection_asyncTaskSlabAllocations` on such allocations to find out about the contents.
rdar://82549631
We remove the existing `swift_reflection_iterateAsyncTaskAllocations` API that attempts to provide all necessary information about a tasks's allocations starting from the task. Instead, we split it into two pieces: `swift_reflection_asyncTaskSlabPointer` to get the first slab for a task, and `+swift_reflection_asyncTaskSlabAllocations` to get the allocations in a slab, and a pointer to the next slab.
We also add a dummy metadata pointer to the beginning of each slab. This allows tools to identify slab allocations on the heap without needing to locate every single async task object. They can then use `swift_reflection_asyncTaskSlabAllocations` on such allocations to find out about the contents.
rdar://82549631
We were missing a Status field. The reflect_task test didn't catch this becasue it was reading LastAllocation as FirstSlab, which still worked well enough in that context.
rdar://81427584
Fix the declaration of AsyncTask and add a test for iterateAsyncTaskAllocations. Reflection's declaration of AsyncTask had fallen out of sync with the real thing. The test that was supposed to catch this was never actually committed, oops.
Add a swift_reflection_libraryVersion variable to Remote Mirror to indicate the presence of this fix. In the future, the value can be incremented to signal the presence of other changes that can't otherwise be detected.
rdar://80035307
to use it.
ConcurrentReadableHashMap is lock-free for readers, with writers using a lock to
ensure mutual exclusion amongst each other. The intent is to eventually replace
all uses ConcurrentMap with ConcurrentReadableHashMap.
ConcurrentReadableHashMap provides for relatively quick lookups by using a hash
table. Rearders perform an atomic increment/decrement in order to inform writers
that there are active readers. The design attempts to minimize wasted memory by
storing the actual elements out-of-line, and having the table store indices into
a separate array of elements.
The protocol conformance cache now uses ConcurrentReadableHashMap, which
provides faster lookups and less memory use than the previous ConcurrentMap
implementation. The previous implementation caches
ProtocolConformanceDescriptors and extracts the WitnessTable after the cache
lookup. The new implementation directly caches the WitnessTable, removing an
extra step (potentially a quite slow one) from the fast path.
The previous implementation used a generational scheme to detect when negative
cache entries became obsolete due to new dynamic libraries being loaded, and
update them in place. The new implementation just clears the entire cache when
libraries are loaded, greatly simplifying the code and saving the memory needed
to track the current generation in each negative cache entry. This means we need
to re-cache all requested conformances after loading a dynamic library, but
loading libraries at runtime is rare and slow anyway.
rdar://problem/67268325
