This introduces a few unfortunate things because the syntax is awkward.
In particular, the period and following token in \.[a], \.? and \.! are
token sequences that don't appear anywhere else in Swift, and so need
special handling. This is somewhat compounded by \foo.bar.baz possibly
being \(foo).bar.baz or \(foo.bar).baz (parens around the type), and,
furthermore, needing to distinguish \Foo?.bar from \Foo.?bar.
rdar://problem/31724243
Storing this separately is unnecessary since we already
serialize the enum element's interface type. Also, this
eliminates one of the few remaining cases where we serialize
archetypes during AST serialization.
This commit introduces new kind of requirements: layout requirements.
This kind of requirements allows to expose that a type should satisfy certain layout properties, e.g. it should be a trivial type, have a given size and alignment, etc.
Also rename ASTWalker::shouldWalkIntoFunctionGenericParams() to shouldWalkIntoGenericParams() since it's now used when walking NominalTypeDecl (not just AbstractFunctionDecl).
withoutActuallyEscaping has a signature like `<T..., U, V, W> (@nonescaping (T...) throws<U> -> V, (@escaping (T...) throws<U> -> V) -> W) -> W, but our type system for functions unfortunately isn't quite that expressive yet, so we need to special-case it. Set up the necessary type system when resolving an overload set to reference withoutActuallyEscaping, and if a type check succeeds, build a MakeTemporarilyEscapableExpr to represent it in the type-checked AST.
Use a syntax that declares the layout's generic parameters and fields,
followed by the generic arguments to apply to the layout:
{ var Int, let String } // A concrete box layout with a mutable Int
// and immutable String field
<T, U> { var T, let U } <Int, String> // A generic box layout,
// applied to Int and String
// arguments
And make it be able to composite any TypeReprs.
Although Swift doesn't support composition of arbitrary types, AST
should be able to hold any TypeReprs, to represent syntax as accurate as
possible.
ExprHandle is a relic from a horrible time when expressions made their
way into the type system via default arguments. It's been unnecessary
for a long time, so get rid of it.
We were optimizing away unused pattern binding initializer contexts in
both the parser and in semantic analysis, which led to a
somewhat-unpredictable set of DeclContexts in the AST. Normalize
everything by always creating these contexts.
What I've implemented here deviates from the current proposal text
in the following ways:
- I had to introduce a FunctionArrowPrecedence to capture the parsing
of -> in expression contexts.
- I found it convenient to continue to model the assignment property
explicitly.
- The comparison and casting operators have historically been
non-associative; I have chosen to preserve that, since I don't
think this proposal intended to change it.
- This uses the precedence group names and higherThan/lowerThan
as agreed in discussion.
We already have detailed knowledge of Optional's layout in SILGen, so these intrinsics were almost unused. They were only used in a few obscure places by some optional-to-bool conversions, used by 'is [A]' collection tests and the codegen for 'lazy' properties. Change these over to generate an EnumIsCaseExpr that we can directly lower to a 'select_enum' instruction in SILGen, leading to better codegen and obviating the need for these intrinsic functions.
Implement the Objective-C #keyPath expression, which maps a sequence
of @objc property accesses to a key-path suitable for use with
Cocoa[Touch]. The implementation handles @objc properties of types
that are either @objc or can be bridged to Objective-C, including the
collections that work with key-value coding (Array/NSArray,
Dictionary/NSDictionary, Set/NSSet).
Still to come: code completion support and Fix-Its to migrate string
literal keypaths to #keyPath.
Implements the bulk of SR-1237 / rdar://problem/25710611.
Implements the core functionality of SE-0064 / SR-1239, which
introduces support for accessing the Objective-C selectors of the
getter and setter of an @objc property via #selector(getter:
propertyName) and #selector(setter: propertyName).
Introduce a bunch of QoI around mistakes using #selector to refer to a
property without the "getter:" or "setter:", using Fix-Its to help the
user get it right. There is more to do in this area, still, but we
have an end-to-end feature working.
Much of the implementation and nearly all of the test cases are from
Alex Hoppen (@ahoppen). I've done a bit of refactoring, simplified the
AST representation, and replaced Alex's custom
expression-to-declaration logic with an extension to the constraint
solver. The last bit might be short-lived, based on swift-evolution
PR280, which narrows the syntax of #selector considerably.
Previously it was not possible to parse expressions of the form
[Int -> Int]()
because no Expr could represent the '->' token and be converted later
into a FunctionTypeRepr. This commit introduces ArrowExpr which exists
solely to be converted to FunctionTypeRepr later by simplifyTypeExpr.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-502
UnresolvedConstructorExpr is not providing any value here; it's
essentially just UnresolvedDotExpr where the name refers to an
initializer, so use that instead. NFC
As part of this, use a different enum for parsed generic requirements.
NFC except that I noticed that ASTWalker wasn't visiting the second
type in a conformance constraint; fixing this seems to have no effect
beyond producing better IDE annotations.
