Prints a regular error instead of crashing.
The check is done in SILGen, because it's simple. We could also do it earlier, but I don't see a strong reason for this.
rdar://75950093
This follows the design of how we handled this with
sil-verify-all. Specifically, the default behavior is to run only in asserts
builds, but one can use the two flags: enable-ast-verifier and
disable-ast-verifier to override the default behavior.
The reason why this is interesting is that this means that when compiling
normally, we will not run the verifier, so we won't have a perf hit. But we can
now ask the user to run with this flag (or in a future maybe a re-run in the
driver would do this for them), saving us time when screening bugs by avoiding
the need to build an asserts compiler to triage if the ASTVerifier would catch
the bug.
Use the FullyQualified<Type> abstraction from the prior commit plus DescriptiveDeclKind to give a bit more information when issuing a missing member type diagnostic during type resolution.
When a method is called with fewer than two parameter lists,
transform it into a fully-applied call by wrapping it in a
closure.
Eg,
Foo.bar => { self in { args... self.bar(args...) } }
foo.bar => { self in { args... self.bar(args...) } }(self)
super.bar => { args... in super.bar(args...) }
With this change, SILGen only ever sees fully-applied calls,
which will allow ripping out some code.
This new way of doing curry thunks fixes a long-standing bug
where unbound references to protocol methods did not work.
This is because such a reference must open the existential
*inside* the closure, after 'self' has been applied, whereas
the old SILGen implementation of curry thunks really wanted
the type of the method reference to match the opened type of
the method.
A follow-up cleanup will remove the SILGen curry thunk
implementation.
Fixes rdar://21289579 and https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-75.
This commit changes how we represent caller-side
default arguments within the AST. Instead of
directly inserting them into the call-site, use
a DefaultArgumentExpr to refer to them indirectly.
The main goal of this change is to make it such
that the expression type-checker no longer cares
about the difference between caller-side and
callee-side default arguments. In particular, it
no longer cares about whether a caller-side
default argument is well-formed when type-checking
an apply. This is important because any
conversions introduced by the default argument
shouldn't affect the score of the resulting
solution.
Instead, caller-side defaults are now lazily
type-checked when we want to emit them in SILGen.
This is done through introducing a request, and
adjusting the logic in SILGen to be more lenient
with ErrorExprs. Caller-side defaults in primary
files are still also currently checked as a part
of the declaration by `checkDefaultArguments`.
Resolves SR-11085.
Resolves rdar://problem/56144412.
When SE-110 was being implemented, we accidentally began to accept
closure parameter declarations that had no associated parameter names,
e.g.
foo { ([Int]) in /**/ }
This syntax has never been sanctioned by any version of Swift and should
be banned. However, the change was made long enough ago and there are
enough clients relying on this, that we cannot accept the source break
at the moment. For now, add a bit to ParamDecl that marks a parameter
as destructured, and back out setting the invalid bit on the type repr
for these kinds of declarations.
To prevent further spread of this syntax, stub in a warning that offers
to insert an anonymous parameter.
Resolves part of rdar://56673657 and improves QoI for errors like
rdar://56911630
Fixes crashes in 28437-swift-typechecker-validatedecl.swift (from previous commit)
and the compiler crasher 28861-gpdecl-getdepth-generictypeparamdecl-
invaliddepth-parameter-hasnt-been-validated.swift.
* Move most of the simd operators into an optional module
Adding simd to the stdlib caused some typechecker regressions. We can resolve them in the near-term by making the types universally available, but moving the arithmetic operators into a separate module that must be explicitly imported.
* Move two fuzzing tests back to fixed.
* Add SIMDOperators as a dependency for MediaPlayer.
* Move the .-prefixed operator declarations back into the stdlib.
Implements SE-0229.
Also updates simd module types in the Apple SDKs to use the new types, and updates a couple tests to work with the new types and protocols.
Thanks to @slavapestov for pointing this out! The optimization to avoid
looking through the members of a protocol that can’t possibly have any
associated types was for both deserialized protocols and imported
protocols, but I only supported the former in my previous change. Check
both cases and make the reasons much more obvious.
Also, that change resolved an existing compiler crasher as well.
* Obsolete ModifierSlice typealiases in 5.0
* Obsolete *Indexable in 5.0
* Obsolete IteratorOverOne/EmptyIterator in 5.0
* Obsolete lazy typealiases in 5.0
* Drop .characters from tests
* Obsolete old literal protocols in 5.0
* Obsolete Range conversion helpers in 5.0
* Obsolete IndexDistance helpers in 5.0
* Obsolete Unsafe compat helpers in 5.0
* Obsolete flatMap compatibility helper in 5.0
* Obsolete withMutableCharacters in 5.0
* Obsolete customPlaygroundQuickLook in 5.0
* Deprecate Zip2Sequence streams in 5.0
* Replace * with swift on lotsa stuff
* Back off obsoleting playground conformances for now
A constraint like `Parameter == SomethingConcrete` means references to
`Parameter` in that context behave like `SomethingConcrete`, including for name
resolution. Handling the parameter as just a parameter type means that it won't
find any non-protocol nested types (i.e. things other than associated types and
protocol typealiases are invisible).
Fixes rdar://problem/42136457 and SR-8240.
These are all tests that would otherwise fail if the expression type
checker support for Swift 3 is removed.
I've moved some of the code from deleted Migrator tests into new
Constraints tests that verify that we do not support the constructs.
Rather than deferring to the heavyweight validateDeclForNameLookup()
to perform the “get overridden decls” operation, perform a much more
minimal validation that only looks for exact matches when the ‘override’
modifier is present.
The more-extensive checking (e.g., that one didn’t forget an override
modifier) is only performed as part of the “full” type checking of
a declaration, which will typically only be done within the same source
file as the declaration. The intent here is to reduce the amount of
work performed to check overrides cross-file, and limit the dependencies
of the “get overridden decls” operation.
The storage kind has been replaced with three separate "impl kinds",
one for each of the basic access kinds (read, write, and read/write).
This makes it far easier to mix-and-match implementations of different
accessors, as well as subtleties like implementing both a setter
and an independent read/write operation.
AccessStrategy has become a bit more explicit about how exactly the
access should be implemented. For example, the accessor-based kinds
now carry the exact accessor intended to be used. Also, I've shifted
responsibilities slightly between AccessStrategy and AccessSemantics
so that AccessSemantics::Ordinary can be used except in the sorts of
semantic-bypasses that accessor synthesis wants. This requires
knowing the correct DC of the access when computing the access strategy;
the upshot is that SILGenFunction now needs a DC.
Accessor synthesis has been reworked so that only the declarations are
built immediately; body synthesis can be safely delayed out of the main
decl-checking path. This caused a large number of ramifications,
especially for lazy properties, and greatly inflated the size of this
patch. That is... really regrettable. The impetus for changing this
was necessity: I needed to rework accessor synthesis to end its reliance
on distinctions like Stored vs. StoredWithTrivialAccessors, and those
fixes were exposing serious re-entrancy problems, and fixing that... well.
Breaking the fixes apart at this point would be a serious endeavor.
