Mechanically add "Type" to the end of any protocol names that don't end
in "Type," "ible," or "able." Also, drop "Type" from the end of any
associated type names, except for those of the *LiteralConvertible
protocols.
There are obvious improvements to make in some of these names, which can
be handled with separate commits.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17165920> Protocols `Integer` etc should get
uglier names.
Swift SVN r19883
don't call into CoreFoundation to perform UTF-8 transcoding. CoreFoundation
can replace ill-formed sequences with a single byte, which is not good enough
to implement U+FFFD insertion. Instead, use the same transcoding routine as
for contiguous buffer.
Pulled out the transcoding routine into a generic function that should be
specialized and simplified for the case when input is UnsafeArray; we should
not be losing efficiency here.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17297055> [unicode] println crashes when given string
with unpaired surrogate
Swift SVN r19157
Keep calm: remember that the standard library has many more public exports
than the average target, and that this contains ALL of them at once.
I also deliberately tried to tag nearly every top-level decl, even if that
was just to explicitly mark things @internal, to make sure I didn't miss
something.
This does export more than we might want to, mostly for protocol conformance
reasons, along with our simple-but-limiting typealias rule. I tried to also
mark things private where possible, but it's really going to be up to the
standard library owners to get this right. This is also only validated
against top-level access control; I haven't fully tested against member-level
access control yet, and none of our semantic restrictions are in place.
Along the way I also noticed bits of stdlib cruft; to keep this patch
understandable, I didn't change any of them.
Swift SVN r19145
Protocols with associated types can't currently be used as existential
types. Combined with the inability to create type constraints on
generic functions nested in generic types based on the outer type and
the inability to create closures of generic type and the inability to
create protocol constraints that require generic functions and the
inability to create protocols with init() requirements... and this is
what we get.
Swift SVN r10034
