* remove `filterUsers(ofType:)`, because it's a duplication of `users(ofType:)`
* rename `filterUses(ofType:)` -> `filter(usersOfType:)`
* rename `ignoreUses(ofType:)` -> `ignore(usersOfType:)`
* rename `getSingleUser` -> `singleUser`
* implement `singleUse` with `Sequence.singleElement`
* implement `ignoreDebugUses` with `ignore(usersOfType:)`
This is a follow-up of eb1d5f484c.
Instead, remove `Operand.users(ofType:)` which returned a sequence of `Instruction` - which was a kind of replacement for the missing `InstructionSet` API
Check if an operand's instruction has been deleted in `UseList.next()`.
This allows to delete an instruction, which has two uses of a value, during use-list iteration.
This is necessary to fix a recent OSSA bug that breaks common occurrences on
mark_dependence [nonescaping]. Rather than reverting that change above, we make
forward progress toward implicit borrows scopes, as was the original intention.
In the near future, all InteriorPointer instructions will create an implicit
borrow scope. This means we have the option of not emitting extraneous
begin/end_borrow instructions around intructions like ref_element_addr,
open_existential, and project_box. After that, we can also migrate
GuaranteedForwarding instructions like tuple_extract and struct_extract.
* `users`: maps from a sequence of operands to a sequence of instructions
* `users(ofType:)` : as `users`, but filters users of a certain instruction type
* `Value.users`: = `Value.uses.users`
Make filter APIs for UseList chainable by adding them to Sequence where Element == Operand
For example, it allows to write:
```
let singleUse = value.uses.ignoreDebugUses.ignoreUsers(ofType: EndAccessInst.self).singleUse
```
Also, add `UseList.getSingleUser(notOfType:)`
* add `UnownedRetainInst` and `UnownedReleaseInst`
* add `var value` to `RetainValueInst` and `ReleaseValueInst`
* make the protocol `UnaryInstruction` be an `Instruction`
* add `var Type.isValueTypeWithDeinit`
* add `var Type.isUnownedStorageType`
* add `var OperandArray.values`
Let's lldb's `po` command not print any "internal" properties of the conforming type.
This is useful if the `description` already contains all the information of a type instance.
Improve block/instruction lists and similar collections
* pretty print collections in the form “[a, b, c]”
* also do this for lazy sequences
* define a custom Mirror
* in a collection, only print the name of blocks, functions and globals (instead of the full object)
* replace `BasicBlock.reverseInstructions` with `BasicBlock.instructions.reversed()` - in an efficient way
