PrintAsClang is supposed to emit declarations in the same order regardless of the compiler’s internal state, but we have repeatedly found that our current criteria are inadequate, resulting in non-functionality-affecting changes to generated header content. Add a diagnostic that’s emitted when this happens soliciting a bug report.
Since there *should* be no cases where the compiler fails to order declarations, this diagnostic is never actually emitted. Instead, we test this change by enabling `-verify` on nearly all PrintAsClang tests to make sure they are unaffected.
This did demonstrate a missing criterion that only mattered in C++ mode: extensions that varied only in their generic signature were not sorted stably. Add a sort criterion for this.
We could assume usr/include belongs to header search paths. If a header
is located in a deeper location inside this directory, we need to print
the additional path components.
rdar://60857172
When an @_implementationOnly import includes Objective-C categories
for existing types, it's useful to be able to override the members
provided in those categories without exposing them to clients of the
framework being built. Allow this as long as the overriding
declaration is marked as @_implementationOnly itself, with an
additional check that the type of the declaration does not change.
(Normally overrides are allowed to change in covariant ways.)
Part of rdar://50827914
This is a new warning in clang when you use @import in a framework header. That’s often a mistake, but it isn’t in our generated -Swift.h headers. If we’re building with a clang that supports this warning, we’ll now emit a pragma to disable it.
This ensures that 'Foo' always gets imported before 'Foo_Private'.
This shouldn't strictly be necessary but does end up with more
reliable results in practice.
rdar://problem/36159006
These classes don't show up well in generated headers (rdar://problem/20855568),
can't actually be allocated from Objective-C (rdar://problem/17184317), and
make the story of "what is exposed to Objective-C" more complicated. Better
to just disallow them.
All classes are still "id-compatible" in that they can be converted to
AnyObject and passed to Objective-C, they secretly implement NSObjectProtocol
(via our SwiftObject root class), and their members can still be individually
exposed to Objective-C.
The frontend flag -disable-objc-attr-requires-foundation-module will disable
this requirement as well, which is still necessary for both the standard
library and a variety of tests I didn't feel like transforming.
Swift SVN r29760
This is required to correctly use the mock SDK when the SDK overlay is
built and tested separately. (Otherwise, the mock SDK might not get
used, because the overlay SDK options would expand from the
%-substitution, appear first on the command line, and shadow the mock
SDK in the search path).
Swift SVN r25185
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
Doing so is safe even though we have mock SDK. The include paths for
modules with the same name in the real and mock SDKs are different, and
the module files will be distinct (because they will have a different
hash).
This reduces test runtime on OS X by 30% and brings it under a minute on
a 16-core machine.
This also uncovered some problems with some tests -- even when run for
iOS configurations, some tests would still run with macosx triple. I
fixed the tests where I noticed this issue.
rdar://problem/19125022
Swift SVN r23683
