Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.
```
%3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```
Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.
But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:
* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located
* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger
The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
In preparation for putting read2 and modify2 into witness tables and
only including read and modify in them when appropriate, export these
types, mark the module resilient, but mark the types frozen. This keeps
the test passing as written.
When its operand has coroutine kind `yield_once_2`, a `begin_apply`
instruction produces an additional value representing the storage
allocated by the callee. This storage must be deallocated by a
`dealloc_stack` on every path out of the function. Like any other stack
allocation, it must obey stack discipline.
Temporarily allow the legacy behavior of allowing caller coroutine
accessors to observe errors (i.e. by executing no code after the yield
if the caller threw an error) behind the
CoroutineAccessorsUnwindOnCallerError flag.
Experience with `_modify`/`_read` has shown that it is never desireable
to cleanup differently based on whether the caller has thrown. Emit an
`end_apply` in either case.
