It used to be done with a library intrinsic which returns the array and an element address pointer.
A `mark_dependence` was used to "connect" the two results.
But this resulted in completely wrong OSSA after inlining.
It just didn't get caught be the verifier because the SIL was obfuscated by address-pointer conversions.
Now we don't use the second result (= the element address) of the intrinsic but generate a correct borrow scope from the first (= array) result. Within that borrow scope we project out the element address with a `ref_tail_addr` instruction.
This relies on knowledge of the internal Array data structures. However those data structures are baked into the ABI since a long time and will not change.
Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.
```
%3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```
Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.
But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:
* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located
* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger
The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
Array literals only need to be finalized, if the array is really allocated.
In case of zero elements, no allocation is done, but the empty-array singleton is used.
"Finalization" means to emit an end_cow_mutation instruction on the array.
As the empty-array singleton is a read-only and shared object, it's not legal to do a end_cow_mutation on it.
For COW support in SIL it's required to "finalize" array literals.
_finalizeUninitializedArray is a compiler known stdlib function which is called after all elements of an array literal are stored.
This runtime function marks the array literal as finished.
%uninitialized_result_tuple = apply %_allocateUninitializedArray(%count)
%mutable_array = tuple_extract %uninitialized_result_tuple, 0
%elem_base_address = tuple_extract %uninitialized_result_tuple, 1
...
store %elem_0 to %elem_addr_0
store %elem_1 to %elem_addr_1
...
%final_array = apply %_finalizeUninitializedArray(%mutable_array)
In this commit _finalizeUninitializedArray is still a no-op because the COW support is not used in the Array implementation yet.
Instead of building ArgumentShuffleExprs, lets just build a TupleExpr,
with explicit representation of collected varargs and default
arguments.
This isn't quite as elegant as it should be, because when re-typechecking,
SanitizeExpr needs to restore the 'old' parameter list by stripping out
the nodes inserted by type checking. However that hackery is all isolated
in one place and will go away soon.
Note that there's a minor change the generated SIL. Caller default
arguments (#file, #line, etc) are no longer delayed and are instead
evaluated in their usual argument position. I don't believe this actually
results in an observable change in behavior, but if it turns out to be
a problem, we can pretty easily change it back to the old behavior with a
bit of extra work.
This is the last part of SILGen conditionalized on EnableSILOwnership being
set. It also (as you can tell from the diff) eliminates a bunch of code from the
tests.
rdar://29791263
This causes default arguments to get emitted after formal evaluation of `self`, allowing protocol methods to access the opened `Self` type of an existential receiver. Fixes rdar://problem/39524104
The SILGen testsuite consists of valid Swift code covering most language
features. We use these tests to verify that no unknown nodes are in the
file's libSyntax tree. That way we will (hopefully) catch any future
changes or additions to the language which are not implemented in
libSyntax.
I am going to leave in the infrastructure around this just in case. But there is
no reason to keep this in the tests themselves. I can always just revert this
and I don't think merge conflicts are likely due to previous work I did around
the tooling for this.
Otherwise, the plus_zero_* tests will have plus_zero_* as a module name, causing
massive FileCheck problems.
The reason why I am doing it with the main tests is so that I can use it when
syncing branches/etc.
radar://34222540
Currently when function types like `(_: Int...) -> Void` are mangled
their names are going to include enclosing sugar BoundGenericType(Array),
which is not necessary and doesn’t play well with `AnyFunctionType::Param`
which strips the sugar away.
Resolves: rdar://problem/34941557
Keep in mind that these are approximations that will not impact correctness
since in all cases I ensured that the SIL will be the same after the
OwnershipModelEliminator has run. The cases that I was unsure of I commented
with SEMANTIC ARC TODO. Once we have the verifier any confusion that may have
occurred here will be dealt with.
rdar://28685236
Similarly to how we've always handled parameter types, we
now recursively expand tuples in result types and separately
determine a result convention for each result.
The most important code-generation change here is that
indirect results are now returned separately from each
other and from any direct results. It is generally far
better, when receiving an indirect result, to receive it
as an independent result; the caller is much more likely
to be able to directly receive the result in the address
they want to initialize, rather than having to receive it
in temporary memory and then copy parts of it into the
target.
The most important conceptual change here that clients and
producers of SIL must be aware of is the new distinction
between a SILFunctionType's *parameters* and its *argument
list*. The former is just the formal parameters, derived
purely from the parameter types of the original function;
indirect results are no longer in this list. The latter
includes the indirect result arguments; as always, all
the indirect results strictly precede the parameters.
Apply instructions and entry block arguments follow the
argument list, not the parameter list.
A relatively minor change is that there can now be multiple
direct results, each with its own result convention.
This is a minor change because I've chosen to leave
return instructions as taking a single operand and
apply instructions as producing a single result; when
the type describes multiple results, they are implicitly
bound up in a tuple. It might make sense to split these
up and allow e.g. return instructions to take a list
of operands; however, it's not clear what to do on the
caller side, and this would be a major change that can
be separated out from this already over-large patch.
Unsurprisingly, the most invasive changes here are in
SILGen; this requires substantial reworking of both call
emission and reabstraction. It also proved important
to switch several SILGen operations over to work with
RValue instead of ManagedValue, since otherwise they
would be forced to spuriously "implode" buffers.
The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
Deferring to emitRValue doesn't work for inout parameters. Factor out the code for shuffling arguments in TupleShuffleExprs so we can reuse for ScalarToTuple transformations. Building what amounts to a fake TupleShuffle out of a ScalarToTuple isn't the most elegant solution, but I think it's the lowest-risk approach for the short term. Fixes rdar://problem/19814841.
Swift SVN r25290
