Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Gottesman
7b17debfbd Revert "[loop-region] Add in an assert that we should always have a block result for getRegionForNonLocalSuccessors. NFC."
This reverts commit 81e7bdfe1b.

This is not true in non-loop canonicalized SIL. It is true in loop-canonicalized
SIL though. So I need to fix the test to avoid the assert.
2016-01-07 20:46:12 -08:00
Michael Gottesman
81e7bdfe1b [loop-region] Add in an assert that we should always have a block result for getRegionForNonLocalSuccessors. NFC. 2016-01-07 20:32:05 -08:00
Zach Panzarino
e3a4147ac9 Update copyright date 2015-12-31 23:28:40 +00:00
ken0nek
fcd8fcee91 Convert [Cc]an not -> [Cc]annot 2015-12-23 00:55:48 +09:00
Michael Gottesman
472efd46c6 [loop-region-analysis] Store the exiting regions from loops that we compute and used to just throw away.
I need this for loop-arc since I need to be able to analyze all "loop-exits"
when I just have the parent loop region. We are already computing this
information and throwing it away, so there should be no compile time impact.
2015-12-15 02:02:39 -06:00
Michael Gottesman
a3a329fffb Add some comments to LoopRegionAnalysis that explains a few methods in better detail. NFC. 2015-12-15 02:02:39 -06:00
Michael Gottesman
c29236cc89 When sort/uniqueing exiting regions for processing, unique not by pointer value, but by ID. 2015-12-15 00:36:56 -06:00
Michael Gottesman
f3c8c5a774 Create SILBasicBlock::getSuccessorBlocks().
This just runs a transform range on getSuccessor()'s ArrayRef<SILSuccessor> so
one does not need to always call Successor.getBB() when iterating over successor
blocks. Instead the transform range does that call for you.

I also updated some loops to use this new SILBasicBlock method to make sure that
the code is tested out by tests that are already in tree. All these places
should be functionally the same albeit a bit cleaner.
2015-12-15 00:36:56 -06:00
Andrew Trick
739b0e9c56 Reorganize SILOptimizer directories for better discoverability.
(libraries now)

It has been generally agreed that we need to do this reorg, and now
seems like the perfect time. Some major pass reorganization is in the
works.

This does not have to be the final word on the matter. The consensus
among those working on the code is that it's much better than what we
had and a better starting point for future bike shedding.

Note that the previous organization was designed to allow separate
analysis and optimization libraries. It turns out this is an
artificial distinction and not an important goal.
2015-12-11 15:14:23 -08:00