Swift will use the basename + argument names formulation for
names. Update the DeclName interfaces, printing, and __FUNCTION__ to
use the method syntax.
We'll still need to rework the "x.foo:bar:wibble:" syntax; that will
come (significantly) later.
Swift SVN r15763
Language features like erasing concrete metatype
values are also left for the future. Still, baby steps.
The singleton ordinary metatype for existential types
is still potentially useful; we allow it to be written
as P.Protocol.
I've been somewhat cavalier in making code accept
AnyMetatypeType instead of a more specific type, and
it's likely that a number of these places can and
should be more restrictive.
When T is an existential type, parse T.Type as an
ExistentialMetatypeType instead of a MetatypeType.
An existential metatype is the formal type
\exists t:P . (t.Type)
whereas the ordinary metatype is the formal type
(\exists t:P . t).Type
which is singleton. Our inability to express that
difference was leading to an ever-increasing cascade
of hacks where information is shadily passed behind
the scenes in order to make various operations with
static members of protocols work correctly.
This patch takes the first step towards fixing that
by splitting out existential metatypes and giving
them a pointer representation. Eventually, we will
need them to be able to carry protocol witness tables
Swift SVN r15716
Via preprocessor goop, Serialization.cpp generates a set of static
functions that can be used to verify if a set of attributes
can be serialized for a particular declaration.
This design forces the author of the attribute to specify up front
whether or not an attribute is supported on a given declaration
kind. We can possibly hoist this into semantic analysis as well.
These N separate functions do conceptually replace a simple
variadic template implementation. I'm fine with alternatives,
but the goal was to provide a way for the author of new
attributes to describe the requirements in one place: Attr.def.
Swift SVN r15470
This representation is inspired by Clang's internal representation.
The current attribute representation, which is basically a union
of "stuff" in DeclAttributes, is not amendable to richer
attributes, such as @availability, that need to be implemented.
In Clang, attributes are modeled with actual objects that
encode both semantic and syntactic information (e.g., source ranges)
that facilitate richer checking, better diagnostics, and better tools.
This change is foundational for implementing @availability, but
also is a better long-term representation. As a migratory path,
it creates some duplications, with AttrKind and DeclAttrKind, the
two which should eventually become the same thing.
As part of this patch, there is some additional parser recovery
(for the new attribute representation) for duplicate attributes.
The parser now parses the entire duplicate attribute, which could
be quite complex, and then issues a diagnostic that the attribute
is a duplicate (and discarding it). This delayed diagnostic
also allows us to present ranges for the duplicate attribute, which
provides a better user experience.
Swift SVN r15365
Parse function declarations with the form
func murder inRoom(room: Int) weapon(Int) {}
where the function name ("murder") is separated from the parameter
names. This is the same style used in initializers, i.e.,
init withCString(cstr: CString) encoding(Encoding)
Swift SVN r15140
Instead of referencing them by name, serialize a reference to their
storage decl instead, then note which accessor to retrieve.
Uncovered by Chris's override work in r15051...thanks, Chris!
Swift SVN r15063
Previously, we were cloning the default arguments completely, which
meant code duplication (when inheriting within a module) or simply a
failure (when inheriting across modules). Now, we reference the
default arguments where we inherited them, eliminating the
duplication. Part of <rdar://problem/16318855>.
Swift SVN r15062
The driver infers the filename from the module file by replacing the extension,
and passes the explicit path to the swiftdoc file to the frontend. But there
is no option in the driver to control emission of swiftdoc (it is always
emitted, and name is always inferred from the swiftmodule name).
The swiftdoc file consists of a single table that maps USRs to {brief comment,
raw comment}. In order to look up a comment for decl we generate the USR
first. We hope that the performance hit will not be that bad, because most
declarations come from Clang. The advantage of this design is that the
swiftdoc file is not locked to the swiftmodule file, and can be updated,
replaced, and even localized.
Swift SVN r14914
When a subclass does not implement a designated initializer of its
superclass, introduce a stub initializer that simply traps. Such stubs
cannot be invoked directly using Swift syntax, but can be invoked
through the Objective-C runtime and from Objective-C code. Catch such
errors rather than allowing them to violate the memory safety of the
language.
Note that we're currently using cond_fail to trap; this will be
improved in the future,
Swift SVN r14839
Let ArchetypeType nested types and PotentialArchetypes be bound to concrete types in addition to archetypes. Constraints to outer context archetypes still suffer type-checker issues, but constraints to true concrete types should work now.
Swift SVN r14832
Previously, serialization of a single source file only includes decls that
are within the SourceFile context. However, new top-level decls can be
added in order to derive protocol conformances; these decls need to be
serialized /somewhere/. Add the concept of decls "forced" to be serialized
along with the decls within the primary SourceFile context, and then mark
all derived top-level decls as "forced" if they come from a decl in the
primary source file.
Possibly a fix for <rdar://problem/16254101>, which crashes nearby.
Swift SVN r14817
Add __FUNCTION__ to the repertoire of magic source-location-identifying tokens. Inside a function, it gives the function name; inside a property accessor, it gives the property name; inside special members like 'init', 'subscript', and 'deinit', it gives the keyword name, and at top level, it gives the module name. As a bit of future-proofing, stringify the full DeclName, even though we only ever give declarations simple names currently.
Swift SVN r14710
The 'override' attribute indicates that the given declaration, which
may be a method, property, or subscript, overrides a declaration in
its superclass. Per today's discussion, the 'override' attribute must
be present if and only if the corresponding declaration overrides a
declaration in its superclass.
This implements most of <rdar://problem/14798539>. There's still more
work to do to on property and subscript overrides.
Swift SVN r14388
The default (F_None) used to mean F_Text, now it is F_Binary, which is arguably
a better default. It only matters on Windows anyway, so just use F_None (to
mean binary mode) everywhere to allow Swift to be compled with older LLVM as
well as current ToT.
Swift SVN r14312
These changes add support for build and target configurations in the compiler.
Build and target configurations, combined with the use of #if/#else/#endif allow
for conditional compilation within declaration and statement contexts.
Build configurations can be passed into the compiler via the new '-D' flag, or
set within the LangOptions class. Target configurations are implicit, and
currently only "os" and "arch" are supported.
Swift SVN r14305
We can attach comments to declarations. Right now we only support comments
that precede the declarations (trailing comments will be supported later).
The implementation approach is different from one we have in Clang. In Swift
the Lexer attaches the comments to the next token, and parser checks if
comments are present on the first token of the declaration. This is much
cleaner, and faster than Clang's approach (where we perform a binary search on
source locations and do ad-hoc fixups afterwards).
The comment <-> decl correspondence is modeled as "virtual" attributes that can
not be spelled in the source. These attributes are not serialized at the
moment -- this will be implemented later.
Swift SVN r14031
Previously, we would just parse vars and subscripts with no definitions,
then let getters and setters be referenced arbitrarily later. This was
problematic for a number of reasons, not least of which, the .sil file
might be invalid.
Instead, change sil to require that a protocol style definition indicate
whether a vardecl/subscript is computed or not, and whether it is both
get-able and set-able, e.g. like "var x : Int { get }". Change the
sil printer to print decls in this form, and change the SILParser to
make SILDeclRef::Func values instead of ::Getter/Setter values.
One thing that this exposed is that we weren't correctly serializing the
accessor state in modules, so accessors would get detatched from their
AbstractStorageDecls when deserialized (and in fact, their ASD never got
deserialized at all in some cases). Fix this in the serialization of
the accessors.
NFC, other than the SIL printer and parser.
Swift SVN r13884
We kinda need those. Limit the hack to pad it out with nulls to only apply in the case when the conformance list is empty but the original archetype requires conformances, which only occurs for archetypes or existentials.
At long last, we can build at -O0 again, again! Reapplying now that Jordan fixed some fallout this had on his objc printer tests. Thanks Jordan!
Swift SVN r13840
We kinda need those. Limit the hack to pad it out with nulls to only apply in the case when the conformance list is empty but the original archetype requires conformances, which only occurs for archetypes or existentials.
At long last, we can build at -O0 again!
Swift SVN r13815
