- Parameterize maybeReadGenericParams' BitstreamCursor so that we can read from the correct cursor when trying to read the generic params of a SILFunction.
- Only serialize the context generic params for SILFunctions for which we're serializing a complete definition. This fixes issues with us getting the wrong archetypes forward-declared from references in other modules.
In this version of the patch, we adjust the deserialization point for the generic param list to correctly come before we check if the SILFunction block is empty, and we add a kludge to keep the JIT from crapping itself when it sees the same transparent definition in multiple REPL lines' modules <rdar://problem/16094902>.
Swift SVN r14030
- Parameterize maybeReadGenericParams' BitstreamCursor so that we can read from the correct cursor when trying to read the generic params of a SILFunction.
- Only serialize the context generic params for SILFunctions for which we're serializing a complete definition. This fixes issues with us getting the wrong archetypes forward-declared from references in other modules.
This gets me a clean build when applied against r13984.
Swift SVN r14005
Previously, we would just parse vars and subscripts with no definitions,
then let getters and setters be referenced arbitrarily later. This was
problematic for a number of reasons, not least of which, the .sil file
might be invalid.
Instead, change sil to require that a protocol style definition indicate
whether a vardecl/subscript is computed or not, and whether it is both
get-able and set-able, e.g. like "var x : Int { get }". Change the
sil printer to print decls in this form, and change the SILParser to
make SILDeclRef::Func values instead of ::Getter/Setter values.
One thing that this exposed is that we weren't correctly serializing the
accessor state in modules, so accessors would get detatched from their
AbstractStorageDecls when deserialized (and in fact, their ASD never got
deserialized at all in some cases). Fix this in the serialization of
the accessors.
NFC, other than the SIL printer and parser.
Swift SVN r13884
GenericSignatures with no params or requirements are a bug, so verify that they don't happen by making GenericSignature::get return null and GenericFunctionType assert that it has a nonnull signature. Hack Sema not to try to produce nongeneric GenericFunctionTypes when a function in a local type in a generic function context is type-checked; there's a deeper modeling issue that needs to be fixed here, but that's beyond the scope of 1.0. Now that GenericSignature always has at least one subtype, its factories no longer need an independent ASTContext argument.
Swift SVN r13837
Change GenericFunctionType to reference a GenericSignature instead of containing its generic parameters and requirements in-line, and clean up some interface type APIs that awkwardly returned ArrayRef pairs to instead return GenericSignatures instead.
Swift SVN r13807
There are some straggling references to the context generic param list, but nothing uses the non-interface param or result types anymore!
Swift SVN r13725
SubscriptDecl is created, then the accessors are installed on it.
This allows us to create the subscript decl before the accessors
have been parsed, allowing us to build the subscript even in invalid
cases (better for later error recovery).
More importantly, this allows us to add it to Decls before calling
parseGetSet, so we can now make parseGetSet add accessors to Decls
without breaking source order (something that deeply upsets the IDE
features).
With all this untangled, we can now remove the 'addAccessorsInOrder'
hack where we parsed the accessors and then later tried to figure out
which order they came for the purpose of linking up the AST: accessors
now work just like everything else.
Swift SVN r13708
now that they are implicitly updated. This exposes two things:
1) we're unncessarily serializing selfdecls in ctors and dtors.
2) The index pattern of a SubscriptDecl has no sensible DeclContext that
owns variables in it.
I'll deal with the first tomorrow, I'm not sure what to do with
the second one.
Swift SVN r13703
with FuncDecls. This allows us to eliminate special case code for handling
self in various parts of the compiler.
This also improves loc info (debug info and AST info) because 'self' now
has a location instead of being invalid.
I also took the opportunity to factor a bunch of places creating self decls
to use similar patterns and less copy and paste code.
Swift SVN r13196
Allow IfStmts and WhileStmts to have as their condition either an expression, as usual, or a pattern binding introduced by 'var' or 'let', which will conditionally bind to the value inside an optional. Unlike normal pattern bindings, these bindings require an in-line initializer, which will be required to be Optional type. Parse variable bindings in this position, and type-check them by requiring an Optional on the right-hand side and unwrapping it to form the pattern type. Extend SILGen's lowering of if and while statements to handle conditionally binding variables.
Swift SVN r13146
Making DynamicSelf its own special type node makes it easier to opt-in
to the behavior we want rather than opting out of the behavior we
don't want. Some things already work better with this representation,
such as mangling and overriding; others are more broken, such as the
handling of DynamicSelf within generic classes and the lookup of the
DynamicSelf type.
Swift SVN r13141
Lower types for SILDeclRefs from the interface types of their referents, dragging the old type along for the ride so we can still offer the context to clients that haven't been weaned off of it. Make SILFunctionType's interface types and generic signature independent arguments of its Derive the context types of SILFunctionType from the interface types, instead of the other way around. Do a bunch of annoying inseparable work in the AST and IRGen to accommodate the switchover.
Swift SVN r12536
This attribute states that all stored properties within the class must
provide initial values. This will allow us to move stored property
initialization into Objective-C's post-allocation initialization hook,
.cxx_construct.
Swift SVN r12228
with qualifiers on it, we have two distinct types:
- LValueType(T) aka @lvalue T, which is used for mutable values on the LHS of an
assignment in the typechecker.
- InOutType(T) aka @inout T, which is used for @inout arguments, and the implicit
@inout self argument of mutable methods on value types. This type is also used
at the SIL level for address types.
While I detangled a number of cases that were checking for LValueType (without checking
qualifiers) and only meant @inout or @lvalue, there is more to be done here. Notably,
getRValueType() still strips @inout, which is totally and unbearably wrong.
Swift SVN r11727
Lower metatype types as @thin or @thick based on whether the type is static and whether the abstraction pattern allows for a thin metatype. Add a '@thick' attribute and require SIL metatypes to always be annotated with either '@thin' or '@thick' to distinguish them from unlowered metatypes.
Swift SVN r11525
We'll need to perform name lookup based on the file-level
DeclContext*, so the module no longer suffices. No functionality
change here yet.
Swift SVN r11523
(various) FunctionType::get's, ArrayType::get,
ArraySliceType::get, OptionalType::get, and a few
other places.
There is more to be done here, but this is all I plan to do
for now.
Swift SVN r11497
This is a structural baby step toward lazily filling in protocol
conformances. We always build a ProtocolConformance, then mark it
either "complete" (when it's well-formed) or "invalid" (when it's
ill-formed). At present, the only benefit to this is that it slows
diagnostic cascades from invalid conformances.
Swift SVN r11492
...rather than a raw pointer that points to a buffer with space for N
elements. Just because we *can* get N from context doesn't mean it's
convenient/safe.
No functionality change.
Swift SVN r11488
typealias MyInt: ForwardIndex = Int
There is no real reason to allow this; it's just a static_assert that Int
conforms to ForwardIndex, which would be better spelled some other way.
This only applies to concrete typealiases, i.e. those that simply alias an
underlying type. Associated types can still have both inheritance clauses
and a (default) underlying type.
Swift SVN r11481