This allows us to dump it in the generated interface, though it's
still not syntax-highlighted. This is necessary for textual module
interfaces, but it's also just a longstanding request for Xcode's
"Generated Interface" / "Jump to Definition" feature.
rdar://problem/18675831
Having this be a single buffer hardcoded in the SourceManager and set
by all clients is silly. SourceFiles with the 'Main' kind are allowed
to have hashbang lines (`#!`), other files are not. And anyone
manually setting up a Lexer can decide for themselves.
No intended behavioral change.
The parser was using an AST-level name lookup operation to provide a
slightly improved diagnostic (suggesting "self." if there was a member
of that name in the enclosing type context). This is a fairly unfortunate
layering violation: name lookup cannot produce correct results at this
point. Remove the custom diagnostic and the lookup; this can come back
when all lookup moves out of the parser.
* [Parser] Keep source location info for the ownership keywords inside a closure capture list
This allows to do syntax coloring for 'weak'/'unowned' inside a capture list
rdar://42655051
In Swift3, shadowning type(of:) was impossible, because it was a parser
magic. In Swift4, type(of:) is resolved as normal function in stdlib so
it can be shadowed. 'TypeOfMigratorPass' was a targeted migrator pass
that prepend 'Swift.' to 'type(of:)' so that it refers Swift.type(of:)
stdlib builtin function.
Fix ASTVerifier error for end location of 'IfConfigDecl'.
Previously, for:
```
#if
// something
<COMPLETE>
```
End location of the dummy body of 'TopLevelCodeDecl' was at the eof, but the
end loc of the 'IfConfigDecl' was at the code-completion token. That
caused the ASTVerifier error "invalid IfConfigStmt end location".
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2364
rdar://problem/41217187
For now, the accessors have been underscored as `_read` and `_modify`.
I'll prepare an evolution proposal for this feature which should allow
us to remove the underscores or, y'know, rename them to `purple` and
`lettuce`.
`_read` accessors do not make any effort yet to avoid copying the
value being yielded. I'll work on it in follow-up patches.
Opaque accesses to properties and subscripts defined with `_modify`
accessors will use an inefficient `materializeForSet` pattern that
materializes the value to a temporary instead of accessing it in-place.
That will be fixed by migrating to `modify` over `materializeForSet`,
which is next up after the `read` optimizations.
SIL ownership verification doesn't pass yet for the test cases here
because of a general fault in SILGen where borrows can outlive their
borrowed value due to being cleaned up on the general cleanup stack
when the borrowed value is cleaned up on the formal-access stack.
Michael, Andy, and I discussed various ways to fix this, but it seems
clear to me that it's not in any way specific to coroutine accesses.
rdar://35399664
Although backtick is a kind of trivia piece, Token::getCommentRange doesn't
take it into account. Invalid Token::getCommentRange used to cause
compiler crash.
rdar://problem/42492793
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-8315
There are two general constructor forms here:
- One took the number of parameter lists, to be filled in later.
Now, this takes a boolean indicating if there is an implicit
'self'.
- The other one took the actual parameter lists and filled them
in right away. This now takes a separate 'self' ParamDecl and
ParameterList.
Instead of storing the number of parameter lists, an
AbstractFunctionDecl now only needs to store if there is a 'self'
or not.
I've updated most places that construct AbstractFunctionDecls to
properly use these new forms. In the ClangImporter, there is
more code that remains to be untangled, so we continue to build
multiple ParameterLists and unpack them into a ParamDecl and
ParameterList at the last minute.
As part of this, lift the now-unnecessary restriction against
combining a non-mutable addressor with a setter. I've also
tweaked some of the diagnostics.
This is in preparation for generalized accessors.
We still produce the same diagnostic as before, but don't add the
parameter lists to the function declaration at all. This allows us
to begin assuming that functions either have 1 or 2 parameter lists.
