- The GenericSignatureBuilder assumed it didn't have to look in
protocol extensions to resolve member types.
- Serialization was incorrectly filtering out such typealiases when
trying to resolve a cross-module reference to one.
rdar://problem/46103190
Instead of using `std::sort`, transform source-ordered edge vector
to reference `IntercomponentEdge *` instead of their indices in
`intercomponentEdges` vector and use `llvm::array_pod_sort` to sort them.
Instead of trying to order based on the "nested depth", let's
always prefer canonical ordering of type parameters when it comes
to picking representative equivalence class.
Resolves: rdar://problem/45957015
We diagnose and flag these in finalize(), but we can encounter one
even earlier through resolveDependentMemberTypes(). Do the same
thing there that we already do in EquivalenceClass::getTypeInContext().
Fixes <rdar://problem/45328122>, <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-9022>.
In structural lookup mode, let's resolve protocol typealiases to
dependent member types also. This is because areSameType() has
no way to see if a type alias is going to be equal to another
associated type with the same name, and so it would return false,
which produced ambiguity errors when there should not be any.
This exposes a deficiency in how we diagnose same-type constraints
where both sides are concrete. Instead of performing the check on
the requirement types, which might be dependent member types that
later on resolve to concrete types, do the check on the actual
equivalence classes further down in the GSB instead.
However, this in turn produces bogus diagnostics in some recursive
cases where we add same-type constraints twice for some reason,
resulting in a warning the second time around. Refine the check by
adding a new predicate to FloatingRequirementSource for requirements
that are explicitly written in source... which is not what
isExplicit() currently means.
This silences the instances of the warning from Visual Studio about not all
codepaths returning a value. This makes the output more readable and less
likely to lose useful warnings. NFC.
Most callers aren't concerned about the difference between the two (and those that are are already exercising the appropriate assertions with e.g the use of `getFirstType()`).
When provided, this flag warns about implicit overrides, where a
declaration overrides another declaration but is not marked with the
‘override’ keyword. The warning can be suppressed by either providing
‘override’ or ‘@_nonoverride’.
At present, this only happens with overrides in protocols.
For explicit abstract protocol floating requirement sources, get the source location from the protocol requirement rather than delegating to the parent `RequirementSource`.
Rather than using RequirementRequest::visitRequirements() for its side
effects, then reading from the TypeLocs left behind, start eliminating
TypeLoc-based APIs so we pass Type and TypeRepr separately.
Add some utilities to dig into a possibly-null RequirementRepr* and dig
out the appropriate TypeReprs.
Introduce a new form of request that produces the ith Requirement of the
where clause of a given entity, which could be a protocol, associated type,
or anything with generic parameters. The requirement can be evaluated
at any type resolution stage; the “interface” type stage will be cached
in the existing RequirementReprs.
Fixes SR-8119 / rdar://problem/41498944.
Extend the inputs to InheritedTypeRequest, SuperclassTypeRequest, and
EnumRawTypeRequest to also take a TypeResolutionStage, describing what
level of type checking is required. The GenericSignatureBuilder relies
only on structural information, while other clients care about the
full interface type.
Only the full interface type will be cached, and the contextual type
(if requested) will depend on that.
- getAsDeclOrDeclExtensionContext -> getAsDecl
This is basically the same as a dyn_cast, so it should use a 'getAs'
name like TypeBase does.
- getAsNominalTypeOrNominalTypeExtensionContext -> getSelfNominalTypeDecl
- getAsClassOrClassExtensionContext -> getSelfClassDecl
- getAsEnumOrEnumExtensionContext -> getSelfEnumDecl
- getAsStructOrStructExtensionContext -> getSelfStructDecl
- getAsProtocolOrProtocolExtensionContext -> getSelfProtocolDecl
- getAsTypeOrTypeExtensionContext -> getSelfTypeDecl (private)
These do /not/ return some form of 'this'; instead, they get the
extended types when 'this' is an extension. They started off life with
'is' names, which makes sense, but changed to this at some point. The
names I went with match up with getSelfInterfaceType and
getSelfTypeInContext, even though strictly speaking they're closer to
what getDeclaredInterfaceType does. But it didn't seem right to claim
that an extension "declares" the ClassDecl here.
- getAsProtocolExtensionContext -> getExtendedProtocolDecl
Like the above, this didn't return the ExtensionDecl; it returned its
extended type.
This entire commit is a mechanical change: find-and-replace, followed
by manual reformatted but no code changes.
Add all of the generic parameters from outer contexts as well. This only
occurs in ill-formed code, but maintains a GenericSignatureBuilder
invariant that it knows about all of the generic parameters in play.
Use the declaration-based name lookup facilities to re-implement
ProtocolDecl::getInheritedProtocols(), rather than dynamically selecting
between the requirement signature and the inherited types. This reduces
dependencies for this computation down to basic name lookup (no semantic
analysis) and gives us a stable result.
When looking for a representative superclass constraint, take into
account other same-type constraints by comparing against the resolved
superclass constraint type rather than the type as spelled.
Fixes SR-8179 / rdar://problem/41851224.
A constraint like `Parameter == SomethingConcrete` means references to
`Parameter` in that context behave like `SomethingConcrete`, including for name
resolution. Handling the parameter as just a parameter type means that it won't
find any non-protocol nested types (i.e. things other than associated types and
protocol typealiases are invisible).
Fixes rdar://problem/42136457 and SR-8240.
More groundwork for protocols with superclass constraints.
In several places we need to distinguish between existential
types that have a superclass term (MyClass & Proto) and
existential types containing a protocol with a superclass
constraint.
This is similar to how I can write 'AnyObject & Proto', or
write 'Proto1 & Proto2' where Proto1 has an ': AnyObject'
in its inheritance clause.
Note that some of the usages will be revisited later as
I do more refactoring and testing. This is just a first pass.
This doesn't fix the fundamental problem of correctly handling such cases, but
it is better than the "error message" that occurred previously:
Assertion failed: ((bool)typeSig == (bool)extensionSig && "unexpected generic-ness mismatch on conformance").
Fixes the crash rdar://problem/41281406 (that in
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-6569 (rdar://problem/36068136)),
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-8019 (rdar://problem/41216423) and
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-7989 (rdar://problem/41126254).
We need to make sure they don't end up as "concrete" equivalence
classes, because they behave more like unresolved ones.
Fixes rdar://problem/40009245.
Concrete and superclass constraints may be written involving type parameters
that are later resolved to concrete types. Perform the substitution to
ensure that type equality within constraint checking accounts for other
same-type constraints.
Fixes assertion in rdar://problem/40428709.
