Macro expansions are currently written to disk using the mangled name of
the macro. Do not use operators that only differ in case-sensitivity to
avoid issues on case-insensitive filesystems.
Resolves rdar://109371653.
The mangling of attached macro expansions based on the declaration to
which they are attached requires semantic information (specifically,
the interface type of that declaration) that caused cyclic
dependencies during type checking. Replace the mangling with a
less-complete mangling that only requires syntactic information from
the declaration, i.e., the name of the declaration to which the macro
was attached.
This eliminates reference cycles that occur with attached macros that
produce arbitrary names.
> LGTM (and you've saved me a [very small] job; I was going to make that change when I had a spare moment).
There was a discussion yesterday where we realized that this wasn't actually documented, so I figured a drive-by fix to documentation was within my abilities. 😇
Add a private discriminator to the mangling of an outermost-private `MacroExpansionDecl` so that declaration macros in different files won't have colliding macro expansion buffer names.
rdar://107462515
* [Executors][Distributed] custom executors for distributed actor
* harden ordering guarantees of synthesised fields
* the issue was that a non-default actor must implement the is remote check differently
* NonDefaultDistributedActor to complete support and remote flag handling
* invoke nonDefaultDistributedActorInitialize when necessary in SILGen
* refactor inline assertion into method
* cleanup
* [Executors][Distributed] Update module version for NonDefaultDistributedActor
* Minor docs cleanup
* we solved those fixme's
* add mangling test for non-def-dist-actor
Extend the name mangling scheme for macro expansions to cover attached
macros, and use that scheme for the names of macro expansions buffers.
Finishes rdar://104038303, stabilizing file/buffer names for macro
expansion buffers.
Use the name mangling scheme we've devised for macro expansions to
back the implementation of the macro expansion context's
`getUniqueName` operation. This way, we guarantee that the names
provided by macro expansions don't conflict, as well as making them
demangleable so we can determine what introduced the names.
- SILPackType carries whether the elements are stored directly
in the pack, which we're not currently using in the lowering,
but it's probably something we'll want in the final ABI.
Having this also makes it clear that we're doing the right
thing with substitution and element lowering. I also toyed
with making this a scalar type, which made it necessary in
various places, although eventually I pulled back to the
design where we always use packs as addresses.
- Pack boundaries are a core ABI concept, so the lowering has
to wrap parameter pack expansions up as packs. There are huge
unimplemented holes here where the abstraction pattern will
need to tell us how many elements to gather into the pack,
but a naive approach is good enough to get things off the
ground.
- Pack conventions are related to the existing parameter and
result conventions, but they're different on enough grounds
that they deserve to be separated.
For performance annotations we need the generic specializer to trop non-generic metatype argumentrs
(which we don't do in general). For this we need a separate mangling.
Upgrade the old mangling from a list of argument types to a
list of requiremnets. For now, only same-type requirements
may actually be mangled since those are all that are available
to the surface language.
Reconstruction of existential types now consists of demangling (a list of)
base protocol(s), decoding the constraints, and converting the same-type
constraints back into a list of arguments.
rdar://96088707
The layout of constant static arrays differs from non-constant static arrays.
Therefore use a different mangling to get symbol mismatches if for some reason two modules don't agree on which version a static array is.
I wrote out this whole analysis of why different existential types
might have the same logical content, and then I turned around and
immediately uniqued existential shapes purely by logical content
rather than the (generalized) formal type. Oh well. At least it's
not too late to make ABI changes like this.
We now store a reference to a mangling of the generalized formal
type directly in the shape. This type alone is sufficient to unique
the shape:
- By the nature of the generalization algorithm, every type parameter
in the generalization signature should be mentioned in the
generalized formal type in a deterministic order.
- By the nature of the generalization algorithm, every other
requirement in the generalization signature should be implied
by the positions in which generalization type parameters appear
(e.g. because the formal type is C<T> & P, where C constrains
its type parameter for well-formedness).
- The requirement signature and type expression are extracted from
the existential type.
As a result, we no longer rely on computing a unique hash at
compile time.
Storing this separately from the requirement signature potentially
allows runtimes with general shape support to work with future
extensions to existential types even if they cannot demangle the
generalized formal type.
Storing the generalized formal type also allows us to easily and
reliably extract the formal type of the existential. Otherwise,
it's quite a heroic endeavor to match requirements back up with
primary associated types. Doing so would also only allows us to
extract *some* matching formal type, not necessarily the *right*
formal type. So there's some good synergy here.
The `Qr` mangling is used to refer to the opaque type within the
declaration that produces the opaque type. When there are multiple
opaque types, e.g., due to structural or named opaque result types, it
does not specify which of the opaque type parameters it refers to.
Introduce a new mangling `QR INDEX` for opaque type parameters after
the first, retaining the `Qr` mangling for the first opaque type
parameter. This way, existing (non-structural) uses of opaque result
types retain the same manglings, but uses of structural or named
opaque result types (new features) will have distinct manglings.
Note that this mangling within a declaration is only used for the
declaration itself, and not for references to the opaque type of the
declaration, so there is no impact on the runtime demangler.
There are three major changes here:
1. The addition of "SILFunctionTypeRepresentation::CXXMethod".
2. C++ methods are imported with their members *last*. Then the arguments are switched when emitting the IR for an application of the function.
3. Clang decls are now marked as foreign witnesses.
These are all steps towards being able to have C++ protocol conformance.
Distributed thunks were using the same mangling as direct method
reference thunks (i.e., for "super" calls). Although not technically
conflicting so long as actors never gain inheritance, it's confusing
and could cause problems in the future. So, introduce a distinct
mangling for distributed thunks and plumb them through the demangling
and remangler.
We still have code that generates the old mangling (in OldRemangler.cpp), so we
could really do with keeping the documentation for the old mangling scheme
around, at least for now. To that end, I've fetched ABI.rst as at 76820edda9,
removed things not relating to mangling and moved it to ABI/OldMangling.rst.
Isolated parameters are part of function types. Encode them in function
type manglings and metadata, and ensure that they round-trip through
the various mangling and metadata facilities. This nails down the ABI
for isolated parameters.
