Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
SE-390 concluded with choosing the keyword discard rather than forget for
the statement that disables the deinit of a noncopyable type. This commit
adds parsing support for `discard self` and adds a deprecation warning for
`_forget self`.
rdar://108859077
- Allow an if/switch expression to become an
implicit return of a function that has a `#if`
body with a single active element that is an `if`
or `switch`.
- Allow `#if` branches of an if/switch expression,
as long as there is a single active expression
element.
rdar://107487977
Currently, this is staged in as `_forget`,
as part of SE-390. It can only be used on
`self` for a move-only type within a consuming
method or accessor. There are other rules, see
Sema for the details.
A `forget self` really just consumes self and
performs memberwise destruction of its data.
Thus, the current expansion of this statement
just reuses what we inject into the end of a
deinit.
Parsing of `forget` is "contextual".
By contextual I mean that we do lookahead to
the next token and see if it's identifier-like.
If so, then we parse it as the `forget` statement.
Otherwise, we parse it as though "forget" is an
identifier as part of some expression.
This way, we won't introduce a source break for
people who wrote code that calls a forget
function.
This should make it seamless to change it from
`_forget` to `forget` in the future.
resolves rdar://105795731
Introduce SingleValueStmtExpr, which allows the
embedding of a statement in an expression context.
This then allows us to parse and type-check `if`
and `switch` statements as expressions, gated
behind the `IfSwitchExpression` experimental
feature for now. In the future,
SingleValueStmtExpr could also be used for e.g
`do` expressions.
For now, only single expression branches are
supported for producing a value from an
`if`/`switch` expression, and each branch is
type-checked independently. A multi-statement
branch may only appear if it ends with a `throw`,
and it may not `break`, `continue`, or `return`.
The placement of `if`/`switch` expressions is also
currently limited by a syntactic use diagnostic.
Currently they're only allowed in bindings,
assignments, throws, and returns. But this could
be lifted in the future if desired.
And plumb through the logic such that the
DiagnosticEngine can handle StmtKind. We could
introduce a separate DescriptiveStmtKind a la
DescriptiveDeclKind, but it would be a 1:1 map,
so I'm not convinced it's currently worth doing.
`getValue` -> `value`
`getValueOr` -> `value_or`
`hasValue` -> `has_value`
`map` -> `transform`
The old API will be deprecated in the rebranch.
To avoid merge conflicts, use the new API already in the main branch.
rdar://102362022
- Unapplied functions: `if #_hasSymbol(foo(_:))`
- Member references: `if #_hasSymbol(a.x)`
- `.self` expressions on static metatypes: `if #_hasSymbol(SomeEnum.self)`
- Dot syntax call expressions with unapplied functions: `if #_hasSymbol(SomeType.init(_:)`
Additionally, we diagnose when the concretely referenced declaration is not weak linked since this likely indicates that the programmer misidentified the declaration they wish to check or the build is not configured in a way such that the check will be meaningful.
Resolves rdar://99826340
Introduce the compiler directive `#_hasSymbol` which will be used to detect whether weakly linked symbols are present at runtime. It is intended for use in combination with `@_weakLinked import` or `-weak-link-at-target`.
```
if #_hasSymbol(foo(_:)) {
foo(42)
}
```
Parsing only; SILGen is coming in a later commit.
Resolves rdar://99342017
Instead of asking SILGen to build calls to `makeIterator` and
`$generator.next()`, let's synthesize and type-check them
together with the rest of for-in preamble. This greatly simplifies
interaction between Sema and SILGen for for-in statements.
I need to determine when top-level code contains an `await` to determine
whether to make the source file an async context. This logic is
perfectly encapsulated in the `FindInnerAsync` AST walker.
Unfortunately, that is pushed down in Sema/ConstraintSystem and isn't
available at the AST level. I've pulled it up into the brace statement
so that I can use that as part of determining whether the source file is
async in `DeclContext::isAsyncContext`.
Unfortunately, statements don't have an AST context or evaluator or I
would make this a request.
This cleans up 90 instances of this warning and reduces the build spew
when building on Linux. This helps identify actual issues when
building which can get lost in the stream of warning messages. It also
helps restore the ability to build the compiler with gcc.
Many, many, many types in the Swift compiler are intended to only be allocated in the ASTContext. We have previously implemented this by writing several `operator new` and `operator delete` implementations into these types. Factor those out into a new base class instead.
There are a number of occurances that create implicit `Switch`s by passing `SourceLoc()` for all location paramters. Refactor those occurances out to a separate `createImplicit` method that automatically fills the locations with invalid source locations.
At the moment, if there is an error in the `switch` statement expression or if the `{` is missing, we return `nullptr` from `parseStmtSwitch`, but we consume tokens while trying to parse the `switch` statement. This causes the AST to not contain any nodes for the tokens that were consumed while trying to parse the `switch` statement.
While this doesn’t cause any issues during compilation (compiling fails anyway so not having the `switch` statement in the AST is not a problem) this causes issues when trying to complete inside an expression that was consumed while trying to parse the `switch` statement but doesn’t have a representation in the AST. The solver-based completion approach can’t find the expression that contains the completion token (because it’s not part of the AST) and thus return empty results.
To fix this, make sure we are always creating a `SwitchStmt` when consuming tokens for it.
Previously, one could always assume that a `SwitchStmt` had a valid `LBraceLoc` and `RBraceLoc`. This is no longer the case because of the recovery. In order to form the `SwitchStmt`’s `SourceRange`, I needed to add a `EndLoc` property to `SwitchStmt` that keeps track of the last token in the `SwitchStmt`. Theoretically we should be able to compute this location by traversing the right brace, case stmts, subject expression, … in reverse order until we find something that’s not missing. But if the `SubjectExpr` is an `ErrorExpr`, representing a missing expression, it might have a source range that points to one after the last token in the statement (this is due to the way the `ErrorExpr` is being constructed), therefore returning an invalid range. So overall I thought it was easier and safer to add another property.
Fixes rdar://76688441 [SR-14490]
* Initial draft of async sequences
* Adjust AsyncSequence associated type requirements
* Add a draft implementation of AsyncSequence and associated functionality
* Correct merge damage and rename from GeneratorProtocol to AsyncIteratorProtocol
* Add AsyncSequence types to the cmake lists
* Add cancellation support
* [DRAFT] Implementation of protocol conformance rethrowing
* Account for ASTVerifier passes to ensure throwing and by conformance rethrowing verifies appropriately
* Remove commented out code
* OtherConstructorDeclRefExpr can also be a source of a rethrowing kind function
* Re-order the checkApply logic to account for existing throwing calculations better
* Extract rethrowing calculation into smaller functions
* Allow for closures and protocol conformances to contribute to throwing
* Add unit tests for conformance based rethrowing
* Restrict rethrowing requirements to only protocols marked with @rethrows
* Correct logic for gating of `@rethrows` and adjust the determinates to be based upon throws and not rethrows spelling
* Attempt to unify the async sequence features together
* Reorder try await to latest syntax
* revert back to the inout diagnosis
* House mutations in local scope
* Revert "House mutations in local scope"
This reverts commit d91f1b25b59fff8e4be107c808895ff3f293b394.
* Adjust for inout diagnostics and fall back to original mutation strategy
* Convert async flag to source locations and add initial try support to for await in syntax
* Fix case typo of MinMax.swift
* Adjust rethrowing tests to account for changes associated with @rethrows
* Allow parsing and diagnostics associated with try applied to for await in syntax
* Correct the code-completion for @rethrows
* Additional corrections for the code-completion for @rethrows this time for the last in the list
* Handle throwing cases of iteration of async sequences
* restore building XCTest
* First wave of feedback fixes
* Rework constraints checking for async sequence for-try-await-in checking
* Allow testing of for-await-in parsing and silgen testing and add unit tests for both
* Remove async sequence operators for now
* Back out cancellation of AsyncIteratorProtocols
* Restructure protocol conformance throws checking and cache results
* remove some stray whitespaces
* Correct some merge damage
* Ensure the throwing determinate for applying for-await-in always has a valid value and adjust the for-await-in silgen test to reflect the cancel changes
* Squelch the python linter for line length
bindSwitchCasePatternVars() was introduced as a simpler way to wire up
the "parent" links for case variables with same-named case variables
from the previous case item, and is used in the function builders code
to handle switch statements. It duplicated some logic from the
statement checker that did the same thing using a more complicated
algorithm.
Switch (ha ha) the logic in the statement checker over to using
bindSwitchCasePatternVars(), fixing a bug involving unresolved
patterns along the way, and remove the old code that incrementally
wired up the parent links. The resulting code is simpler and is
unified across the various code paths.
`PreCheckFunctionBuilderRequest` applies `PreCheckExpression` to the
expressions inside the function body. Previously it used to receive only
`AnyFunctionRef` (`FunctionDecl` or `ClosureExpr`) as the parameter.
However, when fast-completion kicks-in, it replaces the body of the
function, then tries to call `PreCheckFunctionBuilderRequest` again, with
the same function decl as before. It used to return cached "Success"
result, but it didn't actually apply `PreCheckExpression`. So any
`UnresolvedDeclRefExpr` remained unresolved.
In this patch, make `PreCheckFunctionBuilderRequest` receive "body" of the
function as well, so it doesn't return the cached result for the *previous*
body.
rdar://problem/65692922
Annotate the covered switches with `llvm_unreachable` to avoid the MSVC
warning which does not recognise the covered switches. This allows us
to avoid a spew of warnings.
Like switch cases, a catch clause may now include a comma-
separated list of patterns. The body will be executed if any
one of those patterns is matched.
This patch replaces `CatchStmt` with `CaseStmt` as the children
of `DoCatchStmt` in the AST. This necessitates a number of changes
throughout the compiler, including:
- Parser & libsyntax support for the new syntax and AST structure
- Typechecking of multi-pattern catches, including those which
contain bindings.
- SILGen support
- Code completion updates
- Profiler updates
- Name lookup changes
