A scoped-down version of #39307. Implement extension of bound generic types. The important bit here is in TypeCheckGeneric where we now use the underlying type of a typealias and its associated nominal type decl when we're generating substitutions for the extended type.
Put this behind a new experimental flag
-enable-experimental-bound-generic-extensions
Resolves SR-4875
Resolves rdar://17434633
Replace the existing `-enable-experimental-clang-importer-diagnostics`
flag with an opt-out version entitled `-disable-experimentalc-clang-importer-diagnostics`.
Enable the beviour previously hidden behind the old flag by default.
Swift string literals are only permitted to contain well-formed UTF-8, but C does not share this restriction, and ClangImporter wasn't checking for that before it created `StringLiteralExpr`s for imported macros; this could cause crashes when importing a header. This commit makes us drop these macros instead.
Although invalid UTF-8 always *did* cause a segfault in my testing, I'm not convinced that there isn't a way to cause a miscompile with a bug like this. If we somehow did generate code that fed ill-formed UTF-8 to the builtin literal init for Swift.String, the resulting string could cause undefined behavior at runtime. So I have additionally added a defensive assertion to StringLiteralInst that any UTF-8 string represented in SIL is well-formed. Hopefully that will catch any non-crashing compiler bugs like this one.
Fixes rdar://67840900.
This feature allows the following construct to work:
protocol P1 {
associatedtype T : P1
}
protocol P2 {
associatedtype T : P2
}
func foo<T : P1 & P2>(_: T) {}
However, I haven't figured out how to make it work with rewrite system
minimization, so it's already disabled when you use the requirement
machine for protocol or generic signature minimization. In addition to
that it adds some complexity.
I haven't found any real-world uses of this pattern yet, so I'm going
to try to turn it off, and if nobody complains, remove the support
altogether.
If people do complain, we'll have to figure out how to make it work with
minimization.
While implicitly building .swiftinterface, the interface may import other binary modules.
These binary modules may contain serialized search paths that have been obfuscated. To help
interface building commands recover these search paths, we need to pass down the obfuscators
to the module building commands.
rdar://87840268
Allow a user-defined `buildBlock(combining:into:)` to combine subexpressions in a block pairwise top to bottom. To use `buildBlock(_combining:into:)`, the user also needs to provide a unary `buildBlock(_:)` as a base case. The feature is being gated under frontend flag `-enable-experimental-pairwise-build-block`.
This will enable use cases in `RegexBuilder` in experimental declarative string processing, where we need to concatenate tuples and conditionally skip captureless regexes. For example:
```swift
let regex = Regex {
"a" // Regex<Substring>
OneOrMore("b").capture() // Regex<(Substring, Substring)>
"c" // Regex<Substring>
Optionally("d".capture()) // Regex<(Substring, Substring?)>
} // Regex<Tuple3<Substring, Substring, Substring?>>
let result = "abc".firstMatch(of: regex)
// MatchResult<(Substring, Substring, Substring?)>
```
In this example, patterns `"a"` and `"c"` have no captures, so we need to skip them. However with the existing result builder `buildBlock()` feature that builds a block wholesale from all subexpressions, we had to generate `2^arity` overloads accounting for any occurrences of captureless regexes. There are also other complexities such as having to drop-first from the tuple to obtain the capture type. Though these features could in theory be supported via variadic generics, we feel that allowing result builders to pairwise combine subexpressions in a block is a much simpler and potentially more useful approach.
With `buildBlock(_combining:into:)`, the regex builders can be defined as the following, assuming we have variadic generics:
```swift
enum RegexBuilder {
static func buildBlock() -> Regex<Substring>
static func buildBlock<Match>(_ x: Regex<Match>) -> Regex<Match>
static func buildBlock<
ExistingWholeMatch, NewWholeMatch, ExistingCaptures..., NewCaptures...
>(
_combining next: Regex<(NewWholeMatch, NewCaptures...)>,
into combined: Regex<(ExistingWholeMatch, ExistingCaptures...)>
) -> Regex<Substring, ExistingCaptures..., NewCaptures...>
}
```
Before we have variadic generics, we can define overloads of `buildBlock(_combining:into:)` for up to a certain arity. These overloads will be much fewer than `2^arity`.
