If the pattern doesn't have any pack parameters in it anymore,
we need to recover the substituted count type from the original
count type.
Fixes rdar://problem/112065340.
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
The best substitutions we can easily find in nested functions for
captured local variables are the forwarding substitutions of the
current environment. These should be fine for type-substitution
purposes but do not necessarily match the generic signature of the
original variable's environment, which can trip these assertions.
Unfortunately, I can't think of an easy way to weaken these
assertions sufficiently to cover this case.
This should fix the source-compat suite regression reported in
rdar://107642925.
whichever case it happens to be in.
This is a basic fix so that parallel walks on tuples and function
types in the substituted type will work . Separately, though, I
do not think the places that use this really need to be passed an
orig type; this is used for computing type properties, and I am
not aware of any reason we should need an orig type to compute
type properties. Additionally, the orig types computed by this
function are not really correct because of the substitution being
done in some cases, so it'd be very nice to rip this all out.
I'm not good to look into that right now, though.
As I've been iterating on this work, I've been gradually mulling these
over, and I think this is the way to go for now. These should make it
a lot less cumbersome to write these kinds of traversals correctly.
The intent is to the sunset the existing expanded-components stuff
after I do a similar pass for function parameters.
This allows the AP to answer questions like how many
elements/parameters in the substituted type correspond to
this pack expansion.
I've threaded this through a lot of cases for foreign patterns
that probably won't ever need it.
- SILPackType carries whether the elements are stored directly
in the pack, which we're not currently using in the lowering,
but it's probably something we'll want in the final ABI.
Having this also makes it clear that we're doing the right
thing with substitution and element lowering. I also toyed
with making this a scalar type, which made it necessary in
various places, although eventually I pulled back to the
design where we always use packs as addresses.
- Pack boundaries are a core ABI concept, so the lowering has
to wrap parameter pack expansions up as packs. There are huge
unimplemented holes here where the abstraction pattern will
need to tell us how many elements to gather into the pack,
but a naive approach is good enough to get things off the
ground.
- Pack conventions are related to the existing parameter and
result conventions, but they're different on enough grounds
that they deserve to be separated.
We had two notions of canonical types, one is the structural property
where it doesn't contain sugared types, the other one where it does
not contain reducible type parameters with respect to a generic
signature.
Rename the second one to a 'reduced type'.
Before the introduction of parameterized existential types, there
was no generic structure under these types. Now that there is, we'll
need to recurse into them to pick up any latent generic types
and lower them appropriately.
rdar://94320481
Just forgot to change these when I changed the name of the SILType methods. In
summary:
1. withoutMoveOnly -> removingMoveOnlyWrapper
2. withMoveOnly -> addingMoveOnlyWrapper
This change separates out the formation of the generic signature and
substitutions for a SIL substituted function type as a pre-pass
before doing the actual function type lowering. The only input we
really need to form this signature is the original abstraction pattern
that a type is being lowered against, and pre-computing it should make
the code less side-effecty and confusing. It also allows us to handle
generic nominal types in a more robust way; we transfer over all of
the nominal type requirements to the generalized generic signature,
then when recursively visiting the bindings, we same-type-constrain
the generic parameters used in those requirements to the newly-generalized
generic arguments. This ensures that the minimized signature preserves
any non-trivial requirements imposed by the nominal type, such as
conditional conformances on its type arguments, same-type constraints
among associated types, etc.
This approach does lead to less-than-optimal generalized generic
signatures getting generated, since nominal type generic arguments
get same-type-bound either to other generic arguments or fixed to
concrete types almost always. It would be useful to do a minimization
pass on the final generic signature to eliminate these unnecessary
generic arguments, but that can be done in a follow-up PR.
Literal closures are only ever directly referenced in the context of the expression they're written in,
so it's wasteful to emit them at their fully-substituted calling convention and then reabstract them if
they're passed directly to a generic function. Avoid this by saving the abstraction pattern of the context
before emitting the closure, and then lowering its main entry point's calling convention at that
level of abstraction. Generalize some of the prolog/epilog code to handle converting arguments and returns
to the correct representation for a different abstraction level.
Literal closures are only ever directly referenced in the context of the expression they're written in,
so it's wasteful to emit them at their fully-substituted calling convention and then reabstract them if
they're passed directly to a generic function. Avoid this by saving the abstraction pattern of the context
before emitting the closure, and then lowering its main entry point's calling convention at that
level of abstraction. Generalize some of the prolog/epilog code to handle converting arguments and returns
to the correct representation for a different abstraction level.
Literal closures are only ever directly referenced in the context of the expression they're written in,
so it's wasteful to emit them at their fully-substituted calling convention and then reabstract them if
they're passed directly to a generic function. Avoid this by saving the abstraction pattern of the context
before emitting the closure, and then lowering its main entry point's calling convention at that
level of abstraction. Generalize some of the prolog/epilog code to handle converting arguments and returns
to the correct representation for a different abstraction level.
Address a FIXME where lowered types rather than formal types were used
when converting from objc to native types which resulted in a failure to
convert block types.
Remove the default argument for the `memberType`
parameter and enforce that GenericFunctionType is
not passed. Also add a defaulted overload for the
property case, as they should never have a
GenericFunctionType interface type.
This change adds support for calling `operator()` from Swift code.
As the C++ interop manifesto describes, `operator()` is imported into Swift as `callAsFunction`.
Import APIs with the `swift_async_error` attribute in `zero_argument` or `nonzero_argument`
modes by checking the corresponding boolean argument to indicate the error status, instead of
treating it as part of the result tuple. rdar://70594666
An ObjC API maybe imported as async that had multiple non-error arguments to
its completion handler, which we treat in Swift as returning a tuple. Use a new
form of abstraction pattern to represent this return type, to maintain the
correct relation between individual tuple elements and the Clang block parameter
types they map to.
When lowering the type for `@objc` entry points of async declarations, restore
the original ObjC signature with the completion handler argument in the lowered
SIL type.
This adds support to `ClangImporter` to import C++ member function operators as static methods into Swift, which is part of SR-12748.
The left-hand-side operand, which gets passed as the `this` pointer to the C++ function is represented as an additional first parameter in the Swift method. It gets mapped back in SILGen.
Two of the tests are disabled on Windows because we can't yet call member functions correctly on Windows (SR-13129).
Because violations of this might have made an AbstractionPattern incorrectly show up as abstract, it's possible that this will cause an ABI change. However, I haven't been able to find any examples where it does, and certainly there's no way we can promise to maintain the old behavior, especially since it's not done consistently.
