stated in the original source.
If an extension macro can introduce protocol conformances, macro expansion
will check which of those protocols already have a stated conformance in the
original source. The protocols that don't will be passed as arguments to
extension macro expansion, indicating to the macro that it should only add
conformances to those protocols.
* Move collapse(expansions:for:attachedTo:) to SwiftSyntaxMacroExpansion
* SwiftSyntaxMacroExpansion.expandAttachedMacro() now perform collapsing
* SwiftSyntaxMacroExpansion.expandAttachedMacroWithoutCollapsing()
to keep old behavior
* IPC request 'getCapability' now sends the host protocol version
* Unified IPC response 'macroExpansionResult' that returns single string
for both 'expandFreestandingMacro' and 'expandAttachedMacro'
* Compiler accepts old 'expandFreestandingMacroResult' and
'expandAttachedMacroResult' to keep compatibility
* Plugins check the compiler's protcol version to see if it suppports
'macroExpansionResult', and fall back to old behavior if necessary
The compiler knows (from a macro declaration) what freestanding macro
role a macro implementation is expected to implement. Pass that through
to the macro expansion code itself, rather than guessing based on the
protocol conformances of the implementation type. We already use this
approach with attached macros, so this is more of the same.
Eliminates a crash and improves diagnostics when the freestanding macro
role and its implementation are out of sync, fixing rdar://110418969.
Protocol composition types such as `P & Q` are similar to nested types
like `A.B` because the innermost type syntax node at the given position
doesn't cover the whole type. Adjust by looking back up the tree.
This all feels like a hack, and there should be a better way.
While here, fix the source ranges passed in to create
`CompositionTypeRepr`. We were tripping assertions due to missing
source-location information.
Bridge the simple type attributes like `@autoclosure` into an
`AttributedTypeRepr`. We don't validate the arguments, and we don't
handle more complicated attributes like `@convention(c)` just yet.
There is a modeling difference between the swift-syntax tree and the
C++ type representation (TypeRepr) that is a little odd here, so we
end up parsing the ellipsis on the C++ side rather than looking "up"
the syntax tree to find it.
Introduce a new experimental feature `ASTGenTypes` that uses ASTGen to
translate the Swift syntax tree (produced by the new Swift parser)
into C++ `TypeRepr` nodes instead of having the C++ parser create the
nodes.
The approach here is to intercept the C++ parser's `parseType`
operation to find the Swift syntax node at the given position (where
the lexer currently is) and have ASTGen translate that into the
corresponding C++ AST node. Then, we spin the lexer forward to the
token immediately following the end of the syntax node and continue
parsing.
Previously, the compiler fails to read the result from 'getCapability'
IPC message, it used to just emit a fatalError and crashed.
Instead, propagate the error status and diagnose it.
rdar://108022847
Rather than requiring macro implementations to add required whitespace
and indentation, basic format all macro expansions. Right now this uses
the default four space indentation, we can consider having that inferred
later. Macros can opt-out of automatic formatting by implementing
`formatMode` and setting it to `.disabled`.
Also moves the extra newlines before/after expansions to a new "Inline
Macro" refactoring.
Resolves rdar://107731047.
C stdlib headers are part of "Darwin"/"Glibc" clang module.
If a Swift file imports a bridging headers and that has '#include'
C stdlib headers, Swift compiler implicitly imports "Darwin"/"Glibc"
overlay modules. That violates dependency layering. I.e. Compiler
depends on Darwin overlay, Darwin overlay is created by the compiler.
rdar://107957117
In preparation for supporting macros that are defined in terms of other
macros, adopt macro definition checking provided by the
`MacroDeclSyntax.checkDefinition` operation (implemented in
swift-syntax). Use this in lieu of the checking on the C++ side.
This required me to finally fix an issue with the source ranges for
Fix-Its, where we were replacing the leading/trailing trivia of nodes
along with the node itself, even though that's incorrect: we should
only replce the node itself, and there are other Fix-It kinds for
replacing leading or trailing trivia.
