We parse default argument expressions before building a
FuncDecl, so we might see GenericTypeParamDecls that have
not yet been re-parented to the FuncDecl's context.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5559>,
<rdar://problem/33539464>.
In anticipation of future attributes, and perhaps the ability to
declare lvalues with specifiers other than 'let' and 'var', expand
the "isLet" bit into a more general "specifier" field.
* Simplify TupleTypeRepr parsing
This patch introduces a TupleTypeReprElement struct that holds the
locations for all relevant bits of tuple elements. It removes the
NameLoc and UnderscoreLoc arrays from TupleTypeReprElement in favor of
holding each of these on TupleTypeReprElement. These extra bits of info
are required for full-fidelity representation in the Syntax library.
* Remove TupleTypeReprBitfields and move EllipsisLoc out of TrailingObjects
* Update users of TupleTypeRepr
* Don't resize the elts if we're going to push_back
* getType -> getElementType
* Move ellipsis back into TrailingObjects.
* Move NumElements into TupleTypeReprBitfields
This changes `getBaseName()` on `DeclName` to return a `DeclBaseName`
instead of an `Identifier`. All places that will continue to be
expecting an `Identifier` are changed to call `getBaseIdentifier` which
will later assert that the `DeclName` is actually backed by an
identifier and not a special name.
For transitional purposes, a conversion operator from `DeclBaseName` to
`Identifier` has been added that will be removed again once migration
to DeclBaseName has been completed in other parts of the compiler.
Unify approach to printing declaration names
Printing a declaration's name using `<<` and `getBaseName()` is be
independent of the return type of `getBaseName()` which will change in
the future from `Identifier` to `DeclBaseName`
Now that preCheckExpression() can handle more cases, we can
eliminate a special case where sometimes we would make
DeclRefExprs instead of TypeExprs for references to generic
types.
This is a bit more robust and user-friendly than hoping more brittle recovery in SILGen or IRGen for unsupported components kicks in. rdar://problem/32200714
Swift 3 supported limited argument destructuring when it comes to
declaring (trailing) closures. Such behavior has been changed by
SE-0110. This patch aims to provide better error message as well
as fix-it (if structure of the expected and actual arguments matches)
to make the migration easier and disambiguate some of the common
mistakes.
Resolves: SR-4738, SR-4745, rdar://problem/31892961.
This introduces a few unfortunate things because the syntax is awkward.
In particular, the period and following token in \.[a], \.? and \.! are
token sequences that don't appear anywhere else in Swift, and so need
special handling. This is somewhat compounded by \foo.bar.baz possibly
being \(foo).bar.baz or \(foo.bar).baz (parens around the type), and,
furthermore, needing to distinguish \Foo?.bar from \Foo.?bar.
rdar://problem/31724243
TODO:
- Select the KeyPath subclass corresponding to the write capability of the key path components
- Figure out an issue with unresolved solutions being chosen with contextually-typed keypaths
- Diagnostic QoI
foo(_: 3) is equivalent to foo(3), so calling a function that has _ as
an argument label (func foo(`_`: 3)) still requires the _ to be
escaped. Before this patch, the compiler would suggest removing the `s,
even though that changes behaviour.
Fixes rdar://problem/31077797.
Add an option to the lexer to go back and get a list of "full"
tokens, which include their leading and trailing trivia, which
we can index into from SourceLocs in the current AST.
This starts the Syntax sublibrary, which will support structured
editing APIs. Some skeleton support and basic implementations are
in place for types and generics in the grammar. Yes, it's slightly
redundant with what we have right now. lib/AST conflates syntax
and semantics in the same place(s); this is a first step in changing
that to separate the two concepts for clarity and also to get closer
to incremental parsing and type-checking. The goal is to eventually
extract all of the syntactic information from lib/AST and change that
to be more of a semantic/symbolic model.
Stub out a Semantics manager. This ought to eventually be used as a hub
for encapsulating lazily computed semantic information for syntax nodes.
For the time being, it can serve as a temporary place for mapping from
Syntax nodes to semantically full lib/AST nodes.
This is still in a molten state - don't get too close, wear appropriate
proximity suits, etc.
`1 { }` was parsed as a call expression with a trailing closure. This made the diagnostics for `var x = 1 { get { ... } }` extremely bad. Resolves SR-3671.
Crashers fixed are minor logic errors:
Patterns: Crash occurred when requesting the range of a created
Pattern. Validity of the range should be checked before returning it
to keep the entire range valid or invalid but never both.
ParseExpr/ParsePattern: The same fixes as the ones provided in #6319
CSDiag: The generic visitor needn’t look through TypeVarTypes either.
Fixes SR-2757.
Variables in capture lists are treated as 'let' constants, which can
result in misleading, incorrect diagnostics. Mark them as such in order
to produce better diagnostics, by adding an extra parameter to the
VarDecl initializer.
Alternatively, these variables could be marked as implicit, but that
results in other diagnostic problems: capture list variables that are
never used produce warnings, but these warnings aren't normally emitted for
implicit variables. Other assertions in the compiler also misfire when
these variables are treated as implicit.
Another alternative would be to walk up the AST and determine whether
the `VarDecl`, but there doesn't appear to be a way to do so.
`type(of:)` has behavior whose type isn't directly representable in Swift's type system, since it produces both concrete and existential metatypes. In Swift 3 we put in a parser hack to turn `type(of: <expr>)` into a DynamicTypeExpr, but this effectively made `type(of:)` a reserved name. It's a bit more principled to put `Swift.type(of:)` on the same level as other declarations, even with its special-case type system behavior, and we can do this by special-casing the type system we produce during overload resolution if `Swift.type(of:)` shows up in an overload set. This also lays groundwork for handling other declarations we want to ostensibly behave like normal declarations but with otherwise inexpressible types, viz. `withoutActuallyEscaping` from SE-0110.
Changes:
* Terminate all namespaces with the correct closing comment.
* Make sure argument names in comments match the corresponding parameter name.
* Remove redundant get() calls on smart pointers.
* Prefer using "override" or "final" instead of "virtual". Remove "virtual" where appropriate.
The crashes fixed appeared at first to be related to IfConfigStmt
parsing, but are in reality symptoms of being too lax in what we accept
when parsing of sub-expressions fail.
Optional type annotation parsing used to propagate failures before it
was patched to ‘recover’ with an AnyPattern. Instead, we’ll just hit
the error path for parsing in the main expressions because what is here
now isn’t a reasonable thing to return.
#selector parsing assumed that the current token it was at after
consuming up to a right-brace wasn’t bogus. Instead, if we’ve got
here, we may as well just return a loc we know is valid: PreviousLoc.
