The main effect of this change is that diagnostics about Sendable
conformances now follow the same minimal/full logic used for other
Sendable diagnostics, rather than having their own separate
computation.
Extend the diagnostics for `Sendable` conformances to always diagnose
missing `Sendable` conformances for nominal types that are within the
same module. The intuition here is that if the type is in the same
module, it can be updated and evaluated at the same time as code
requiring the `Sendable` conformance is introduced.
Another part of rdar://78269348.
Rework Sendable checking to be completely based on "missing"
conformances, so that we can individually diagnose missing Sendable
conformances based on both the module in which the conformance check
happened as well as where the type was declared. The basic rules here
are to only diagnose if either the module where the non-Sendable type
was declared or the module where it was checked was compiled with a
mode that consistently diagnoses `Sendable`, either by virtue of
being Swift 6 or because `-warn-concurrency` was provided on the
command line. And have that diagnostic be an error in Swift 6 or
warning in Swift 5.x.
There is much tuning to be done here.
One cannot introduce ConcurrentValue conformance on a class
that has a (non-NSObject) superclass, nor put a ConcurrentValue
conformance on an open class.
